Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

17 inch Cup II's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2021, 09:17 AM
  #31  
jchasty
Rennlist Member
 
jchasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ferndown, Dorset, England
Posts: 426
Received 140 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

None at all....
Old 01-27-2021, 09:56 AM
  #32  
StratfordShark
Drifting
 
StratfordShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon
Posts: 3,257
Received 86 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jchasty
None at all....
wouldnt that upset handling? Car designed for ET65 front, ET55 rear
Old 01-27-2021, 10:01 AM
  #33  
jchasty
Rennlist Member
 
jchasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ferndown, Dorset, England
Posts: 426
Received 140 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

I don't know - I've seen more extreme offset differences used on here. I haven't driven it yet - it's bucketing down here!
Old 01-27-2021, 11:00 AM
  #34  
StratfordShark
Drifting
 
StratfordShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon
Posts: 3,257
Received 86 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Quoting from another thread, where someone asked about a set with ET50 front:

Bales, to add to Stan's comments there are two issues that I see: One is that the front offset at ET 50mm is too small. What that does is move the tires outboard of the neutral steering axis, which means that if a tire runs into anything soft (standing water, rutted pavement, edge of the road) then it will pull towards that direction. The neutral axis Is 55mm, factory wheels are ET65mm (60mm for ClubSports), not a huge difference. But one of our wheel sets is aftermarket 18" Cup-2's at 52mm in the front, and I do not like them. On our worn highway pavement, they definitely make the front end feel squirrely compared to 18's with ET 61 or 17" ET65. In the mountains they are fine, it is the highway cruising that is annoying.
Old 01-27-2021, 11:06 AM
  #35  
jchasty
Rennlist Member
 
jchasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ferndown, Dorset, England
Posts: 426
Received 140 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Thanks - I'll give it a go! :-)

Old 01-27-2021, 02:37 PM
  #36  
jchasty
Rennlist Member
 
jchasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ferndown, Dorset, England
Posts: 426
Received 140 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StratfordShark
Quoting from another thread, where someone asked about a set with ET50 front:

Bales, to add to Stan's comments there are two issues that I see: One is that the front offset at ET 50mm is too small. What that does is move the tires outboard of the neutral steering axis, which means that if a tire runs into anything soft (standing water, rutted pavement, edge of the road) then it will pull towards that direction. The neutral axis Is 55mm, factory wheels are ET65mm (60mm for ClubSports), not a huge difference. But one of our wheel sets is aftermarket 18" Cup-2's at 52mm in the front, and I do not like them. On our worn highway pavement, they definitely make the front end feel squirrely compared to 18's with ET 61 or 17" ET65. In the mountains they are fine, it is the highway cruising that is annoying.
There are these with ET65 but 4 times the price:

TEILE.COM | 17-inch CUP wheel, 7,5J x 17 ET65 / new / 968 / 601-00 Rims / 9653621240561M



Old 01-28-2021, 01:56 PM
  #37  
jchasty
Rennlist Member
 
jchasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ferndown, Dorset, England
Posts: 426
Received 140 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StratfordShark
Quoting from another thread, where someone asked about a set with ET50 front:

Bales, to add to Stan's comments there are two issues that I see: One is that the front offset at ET 50mm is too small. What that does is move the tires outboard of the neutral steering axis, which means that if a tire runs into anything soft (standing water, rutted pavement, edge of the road) then it will pull towards that direction. The neutral axis Is 55mm, factory wheels are ET65mm (60mm for ClubSports), not a huge difference. But one of our wheel sets is aftermarket 18" Cup-2's at 52mm in the front, and I do not like them. On our worn highway pavement, they definitely make the front end feel squirrely compared to 18's with ET 61 or 17" ET65. In the mountains they are fine, it is the highway cruising that is annoying.
I went for a "spirited drive" today. I didn't experience any issues with tramlining or squirming, in fact they felt better than my 16 inch stock wheels. Now, I'm on brand new premium tyres, so maybe as they wear, I will notice something untoward.

I hope that helps?
Old 01-28-2021, 02:45 PM
  #38  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,829
Received 721 Likes on 577 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jchasty
I went for a "spirited drive" today. I didn't experience any issues with tramlining or squirming, in fact they felt better than my 16 inch stock wheels. Now, I'm on brand new premium tyres, so maybe as they wear, I will notice something untoward.

I hope that helps?
Theory says that the offset you have on those wheels may optimize cornering performance but the fact is that the reason the offset should be 65mm may well not be apparent until such time as it is too late sad to say- hopefully you will never have to find out the hard way and you would have to be pretty unlucky for such to happen but.....?

Not sure what the legal position is in the UK with regard to non stock modifications but if nothing else I would think that you need to be aware as to whether such fitment could potentially invalidate your insurance. If you did happen to wipe out and a big claim resulted insurance investigators might cotton on and theoretically could use such as a basis not to cough up. Most UK insurance quotations specifically ask whether the car has been modified in anyway- if you have declared such all well and good..

As you have seen wheels with ET65 are more expensive- with a greater degree of overhang the wheels need to be stronger to resist the increased over turning moment. Such offsets are quite rare so no economy of scale as it were.
Old 01-28-2021, 02:56 PM
  #39  
jchasty
Rennlist Member
 
jchasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ferndown, Dorset, England
Posts: 426
Received 140 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
Theory says that the offset you have on those wheels may optimize cornering performance but the fact is that the reason the offset should be 65mm may well not be apparent until such time as it is too late sad to say- hopefully you will never have to find out the hard way and you would have to be pretty unlucky for such to happen but.....?

Not sure what the legal position is in the UK with regard to non stock modifications but if nothing else I would think that you need to be aware as to whether such fitment could potentially invalidate your insurance. If you did happen to wipe out and a big claim resulted insurance investigators might cotton on and theoretically could use such as a basis not to cough up. Most UK insurance quotations specifically ask whether the car has been modified in anyway- if you have declared such all well and good..

As you have seen wheels with ET65 are more expensive- with a greater degree of overhang the wheels need to be stronger to resist the increased over turning moment. Such offsets are quite rare so no economy of scale as it were.
Thanks Fred

Is the general consensus that I should just sell my firstborn and get ET65 fronts on the basis of being able to sleep at night?

17" Porsche Cup wheels in 9A1 Silver - Alloy Wheels Direct (2461916)





Old 01-28-2021, 03:57 PM
  #40  
SteveG
Rennlist Member
 
SteveG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 6,513
Received 98 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Polished Cup II on mine.





Last edited by SteveG; 01-28-2021 at 04:01 PM.
Old 01-29-2021, 06:04 AM
  #41  
StratfordShark
Drifting
 
StratfordShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon
Posts: 3,257
Received 86 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jchasty
Thanks Fred

Is the general consensus that I should just sell my firstborn and get ET65 fronts on the basis of being able to sleep at night?

17" Porsche Cup wheels in 9A1 Silver - Alloy Wheels Direct (2461916)
I don't know John, but Fred's comments on insurance are potentially crucial.

The reason I was so interested in your Cup 1s is that I have original set on my S4 and agree they suit the 928 brilliantly. Recently I had them powder-coated and had a lot of grief and to-and-fro to the tyre fitters as I was having difficulty getting the RDK switches to seal properly, and had to get round fact that the RDK nuts are NLA. I like having the system all working as it's accurate and reliable in my case (yes I know Fred isn't a fan!), but even if I did what many do and 'defeat' the system, I'd still need to weld up the wheels to cover the 30mm holes! Happily I discovered the correct sealant to use and how to apply and I'm pretty much home (one wheel which I sealed the 'wrong' way has a very very slow leak, but I'll redo that one post-lockdown.

The RDK system adds extra costs (switches, o-ring, protective cover, nut) so when I was getting very frustrated with leaks on an otherwise lovely set of brand-new looking wheels, I even looked round at what it cost to replace the wheels with non-RDK alloys (I think the wheels you've linked to require RDK switches installed) and was horrified by the cost — a few years ago you could pick up running 928s for the cost of four new Cup wheels from Porsche! Hence I focused back on getting my wheels properly airtight, but also why I was curious about the set you obtained.

Really envy our 911/Boxster/944 cousins who have choice of more reasonably priced wheels as they are more plentiful. The unique offset of 928 spec is in effect another 928 'tax', but I like to feel those wonderful engineers at Porsche knew what they were doing when they specified them.

All the best.

Last edited by StratfordShark; 01-29-2021 at 06:17 AM.
Old 01-29-2021, 06:29 AM
  #42  
dimi5928
Rennlist Member
 
dimi5928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montreal, CA,
Posts: 538
Received 180 Likes on 87 Posts
Default


Factory chrome CupII on mine.
Old 01-29-2021, 10:50 AM
  #43  
jchasty
Rennlist Member
 
jchasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ferndown, Dorset, England
Posts: 426
Received 140 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StratfordShark
I don't know John, but Fred's comments on insurance are potentially crucial.

The reason I was so interested in your Cup 1s is that I have original set on my S4 and agree they suit the 928 brilliantly. Recently I had them powder-coated and had a lot of grief and to-and-fro to the tyre fitters as I was having difficulty getting the RDK switches to seal properly, and had to get round fact that the RDK nuts are NLA. I like having the system all working as it's accurate and reliable in my case (yes I know Fred isn't a fan!), but even if I did what many do and 'defeat' the system, I'd still need to weld up the wheels to cover the 30mm holes! Happily I discovered the correct sealant to use and how to apply and I'm pretty much home (one wheel which I sealed the 'wrong' way has a very very slow leak, but I'll redo that one post-lockdown.

The RDK system adds extra costs (switches, o-ring, protective cover, nut) so when I was getting very frustrated with leaks on an otherwise lovely set of brand-new looking wheels, I even looked round at what it cost to replace the wheels with non-RDK alloys (I think the wheels you've linked to require RDK switches installed) and was horrified by the cost — a few years ago you could pick up running 928s for the cost of four new Cup wheels from Porsche! Hence I focused back on getting my wheels properly airtight, but also why I was curious about the set you obtained.

Really envy our 911/Boxster/944 cousins who have choice of more reasonably priced wheels as they are more plentiful. The unique offset of 928 spec is in effect another 928 'tax', but I like to feel those wonderful engineers at Porsche knew what they were doing when they specified them.

All the best.
Thanks - for my own peace of mind, I've ordered Porsche OEM Cup 1s
Old 01-29-2021, 12:26 PM
  #44  
StratfordShark
Drifting
 
StratfordShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon
Posts: 3,257
Received 86 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jchasty
Thanks - for my own peace of mind, I've ordered Porsche OEM Cup 1s
Wow that’s brilliant! Let me know if you have any issues transferring the RDK switches - it became my specialist subject last year!

Adrian
The following users liked this post:
jchasty (01-29-2021)
Old 01-29-2021, 03:49 PM
  #45  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,829
Received 721 Likes on 577 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=StratfordShark;17197162]Wow that’s brilliant! Let me know if you have any issues transferring the RDK switches - it became my specialist subject last year!

Adrian[/QUOTE


I would hope the RDK sensors are fitted given they are genuine Porsche wheels. The part numbers are slightly different from the info in my files but that may be because of some update.

I think the Cup 1 wheels are the best 928 option cosmetically speaking. Mine are sat gathering dust in the garage pending a revamp at some stage in the future. From new the hubs/spokes were painted body colour of Cobalt Blue- looked awesome when new. I figured that should I ever return to the UK with the 928 I would need them as discussed above.


Quick Reply: 17 inch Cup II's



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:35 AM.