When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have pieces of one of those engines I think GB still has the block, it had sleeves and 4.125" pistons. Block might be at my shop at T-Hill I don't remember. The crank is a masterpiece the rest of the engine is an archaeological adventure.
Correct- Mark's best dyno result before the carbon intake was 431/444 rwhp/rwtq in October 2002. The first time out with the carbon intake it made 485/438, in June 2003, and eventually made 511/442 in October 2003, though that hp figure is a bit suspect as there's a lot of weird oscillation at the very end of that hp curve. It was likely closer to 505ish rwhp.
So I'm wrong, it was more like 75 hp and -2 torques.
EDIT: WTF is wrong with IB? I can no longer upload jpg files the way I have for 17 frickin' years. I'm starting to hate this place.
This is great motivation for me to see these number with what was created at the time. I am assuming this is RWHP quoted?
Mark's best dyno result before the carbon intake was 431/444 rwhp/rwtq in October 2002. The first time out with the carbon intake it made 485/438, in June 2003, and eventually made 511/442 in October 2003, though that hp figure is a bit suspect as there's a lot of weird oscillation at the very end of that hp curve. It was likely closer to 505ish rwhp.
So I'm wrong, it was more like 75 hp and -2 torques.
Okay. Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking the wrong torque numbers.
Sorry I just found him in colorado springs colorado, and now has a company "threshie designs" claiming clean energy engine applications......stay far away.......
Sorry I just found him in colorado springs colorado, and now has a company "threshie designs" claiming clean energy engine applications......stay far away.......
03-28-2019, 01:54 AM
