Knock solution; seems too simple? Gasoline questions
#16
Rennlist Member
#17
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
thanks everybody for the gasoline education!
back to the knock solution........back in the weeds with the knocks. here is the chronology:
as mentioned, I make some runs this AM with 3 week old gas. knocks averaged 18. I got about 5 gallons from a new to me Shell station.
recorded knocks were 0 to 1 with an over abundance of runs. I did everything I could to replicate this over and over, and this was the first time
I had ever seen the ZERO!
so my car is capable of zero knocks...
just before I got home this AM I stopped at a Shell near my house to put in a few more gallons. thought I would put in some of more of the good stuff.
7 hours later, I go out and knocks are back at 18.....WTF.
I thought maybe I had some loose cables at either a knock sensor or the hall, but they are fine, and if there was an issue, the hammer would have displayed
a fault code: it did not. maybe the hammer is the problem?? I seriously doubt it. anything is possible, but I really don't think so.
I have been having an issue with the WOT portion of my TPS. most times contact will close properly at pedal down about 80%, but other times, it will not. for
sure it needs to be replaced. (of course, I should have done it with intake out, but it tested fine) could this be the issue??
back to the knock solution........back in the weeds with the knocks. here is the chronology:
as mentioned, I make some runs this AM with 3 week old gas. knocks averaged 18. I got about 5 gallons from a new to me Shell station.
recorded knocks were 0 to 1 with an over abundance of runs. I did everything I could to replicate this over and over, and this was the first time
I had ever seen the ZERO!
so my car is capable of zero knocks...
just before I got home this AM I stopped at a Shell near my house to put in a few more gallons. thought I would put in some of more of the good stuff.
7 hours later, I go out and knocks are back at 18.....WTF.
I thought maybe I had some loose cables at either a knock sensor or the hall, but they are fine, and if there was an issue, the hammer would have displayed
a fault code: it did not. maybe the hammer is the problem?? I seriously doubt it. anything is possible, but I really don't think so.
I have been having an issue with the WOT portion of my TPS. most times contact will close properly at pedal down about 80%, but other times, it will not. for
sure it needs to be replaced. (of course, I should have done it with intake out, but it tested fine) could this be the issue??
#18
Rennlist Member
If you are getting erratic readings, then I suspect that it may just be that when the WOT switch is not working you do not see any knocks and when it is working you do. The hammer tells you something but not everything. ST2 data logging would show where and when the knock events occur and whether the WOT switch was working [or not].
#20
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
it may just be that when the WOT switch is not working you do not see any knocks and when it is working you do.
unfortunately, I do not have access to ST2, so the hammer is all I can rely upon.
On the EZ unit [ignition] the cruise map is ignored and it applies the full throttle map which is a fixed degree of advance irrespective of load for each given rev band in the map.
#21
Rennlist Member
Great topic for continuing exploration and gaining the knowledge that will allow our engines to survive longer.
Many current high performance engine management systems incorporate individual knock sensors for each cylinder. Is there any way to retrofit individual cylinder knock sensors to our cars? My initial thoughts are that it would be too complicated and invasive, but I am continually amazed by the inventiveness and creativity exhibited by members of this forum.
How can we Improve our knock sensing/management capabilities?
Many current high performance engine management systems incorporate individual knock sensors for each cylinder. Is there any way to retrofit individual cylinder knock sensors to our cars? My initial thoughts are that it would be too complicated and invasive, but I am continually amazed by the inventiveness and creativity exhibited by members of this forum.
How can we Improve our knock sensing/management capabilities?
Last edited by 928 GT R; 10-30-2018 at 08:41 AM.
#22
If the WOT switch is not working then the EZK will not reduce the ignition timing to below the knock threshold by switching to the WOT map, as the EZK will believe that the engine is still running under cruise, where the knock threshold is higher than at WOT.
The 32V engines already use one cam position sensor per bank of cylinders. I ignore if the EZK is programmed to run sequential ignition already, but using 2 cam position sensors would be enough for a proper ECU to calculate in which cylinder knock occurs in function of engine position using even only just 2 knock sensors on a V8 engine.
ETA : The EZK would not natively handle sequential ignition since the engine is not running one coil per cylinder anyway.
Many current high performance engine management systems incorporate individual knock sensors for each cylinder. Is there any way to retrofit individual cylinder knock sensors to our cars? My initial thoughts are that it would be too complicated and invasive, but I am continually amazed by the inventiveness and creativity exhibited by members of this forum.
ETA : The EZK would not natively handle sequential ignition since the engine is not running one coil per cylinder anyway.
Last edited by Thom; 10-30-2018 at 08:43 AM.
#23
Rennlist Member
Fred, you mean the inverse, correct??? or if your statement is accurate, what does this mean?
unfortunately, I do not have access to ST2, so the hammer is all I can rely upon.
I thought at WOT timing is retarded because the cylinder temps and pressures are higher than at mid-throttle, so you have to back off the timing, the fuel ignites faster and the flame front travels faster at higher load???
unfortunately, I do not have access to ST2, so the hammer is all I can rely upon.
I thought at WOT timing is retarded because the cylinder temps and pressures are higher than at mid-throttle, so you have to back off the timing, the fuel ignites faster and the flame front travels faster at higher load???
The next step may be to take a look inside the combustion chamber with a boroscope if you can get hold of one. At the moment we are largely in the dark.Just remind me whether the injectors have been u/s cleaned [or not?].
Do not confuse the fact that higher load reduces the amount of advance that can be deployed with the advance used for the max power case where performance takes precedence over economy.
#24
Rennlist Member
Great topic for continuing exploration and gaining the knowledge that will allow our engines to survive longer.
Many current high performance engine management systems incorporate individual knock sensors for each cylinder. Is there any way to retrofit individual cylinder knock sensors to our cars? My initial thoughts are that it would be too complicated and invasive, but I am continually amazed by the inventiveness and creativity exhibited by members of this forum.
Many current high performance engine management systems incorporate individual knock sensors for each cylinder. Is there any way to retrofit individual cylinder knock sensors to our cars? My initial thoughts are that it would be too complicated and invasive, but I am continually amazed by the inventiveness and creativity exhibited by members of this forum.
No need for that with ST2- the stock system can detect what cylinder knocked and when, ST2 can log the data so that one can actually work out what is going on. The engine management system was remarkably advanced for its period and despite what some seem to think it is still very fast today considering it can pull back timing on the next firing stroke. Unfortunately it cannot handle sequential firing although Ken [Porken] had a partial go at that by rewriting the code and making room by ditching superfluous coding.
#25
Rennlist Member
Didn't see where, if at all, it was stated the original fuel was E10 or not?
If it was E10, there is always a small chance that there was a phase separation in the Gas Stations tank. And what you filled up with was lacking the ethanol octane addition.
If it was E10, there is always a small chance that there was a phase separation in the Gas Stations tank. And what you filled up with was lacking the ethanol octane addition.
#26
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
The next step may be to take a look inside the combustion chamber with a boroscope if you can get hold of one. At the moment we are largely in the dark.Just remind me whether the injectors have been u/s cleaned [or not?].
am I wrong to think that because I recorded 0 knocks yesterday, that I should not have any carbon build up on the pistons?? I assume that is what you would like to me look for?
and those multiple zero recordings have nothing to do with the fuel??? remember, after I got the zero runs, I added more fuel from another station?
would a good test be to run this tank down and fill up with some 100 octane? that would seem to eliminate the fuel theory?
#27
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
hers is my unscientific testing this AM: I made many (lots!) of runs within each of the following parameters. no idea if it means jack,
but without a sharktuner, this is my best attempt at trying to isolate where the knocks might be occurring
-first I drove shifting in a near back and forth fashion with max RPMs at 3k making certain not to engage WOT; 0 knocks
-next, same idea with shifts @ 4k; 8 knocks
-then shifting to 4k, letting it drop to 2500, then back to 4k over and over, but with pedal floored to engage WOTS; 8 knocks
-finally the thrashed WOT, near redline; 18 knocks
nearly all items that might contribute to knocks have been repaired, or replaced. TPS and ISV are original, as are plug wires. I hope to
smoke test again, and believe that I need to replace the throttle shaft bearings, but I don't think any of those items are responsible for knocks?
how much carbon build up on piston tops does it take to increase knocks?
hoping this might offer a few more clues.
but without a sharktuner, this is my best attempt at trying to isolate where the knocks might be occurring
-first I drove shifting in a near back and forth fashion with max RPMs at 3k making certain not to engage WOT; 0 knocks
-next, same idea with shifts @ 4k; 8 knocks
-then shifting to 4k, letting it drop to 2500, then back to 4k over and over, but with pedal floored to engage WOTS; 8 knocks
-finally the thrashed WOT, near redline; 18 knocks
nearly all items that might contribute to knocks have been repaired, or replaced. TPS and ISV are original, as are plug wires. I hope to
smoke test again, and believe that I need to replace the throttle shaft bearings, but I don't think any of those items are responsible for knocks?
how much carbon build up on piston tops does it take to increase knocks?
hoping this might offer a few more clues.
#28
Rennlist Member
Paul, if the throttle switch shows any flakiness, then replace it. That removes one variable. The effect of a non-working WOT switch is (a) less fuel at WOT, which can certainly cause knocking; and (b) a slight (1-deg) difference in timing which likely has little effect. It does not effect knock-detection or retard.
The EZK, with a working Hall (cam) sensor, knows which cylinder is firing and knows which cylinder is knocking. It then retards that one cylinder in steps until it stops knocking. This is the same thing that any modern system does. The hammer only tells you that EZK is detecting knocks, but not which cylinder(s) or what RPMs. These would be useful things to know.
Fuel is a variable, but octane is not easily verifiable. In any event an S4 should have few if any knock-retards on premium gas, although 91 AKI is getting edgy. We do see differences in knock tendency between stations or one area to another, or temperature, altitude, season, etc. And I am not convinced that a pump labeled "93" is any better than one labeled "91".
But a lean mixture-- either in general or one weak injector-- would definitely be an issue. But again, no data. A wbo2 AFR gauge would be very useful here.
Have you run the WSM fuel-flow test? (Disconnect the return line at the tank and divert it to a measurement jug, jumper the fuel-pump for 30 sec and measure quantity-- should be 1.25L if I recall correctly). A weak fuel pump or a clogged filter will cause fuel pressure to drop at WOT, and a lean mixture. Knowing the L/min flow through the whole fuel system is an important data point.
Did the injectors come with a test-sheet showing flow rate per injector? Where did you install the weakest ones?
How do the plugs look? Are they all the same or some whiter and less-carboned than others? Any signs of leanness? If that correlated with which cylinders are getting retarded then that would be a great data point. (Note that plugs are beastly hard to read with all this "clean" fuel, so this is probably futile).
Certainly peek at the pistons, what you are looking for is any that do not look like the others. Post pics.
#29
Rennlist Member
-first I drove shifting in a near back and forth fashion with max RPMs at 3k making certain not to engage WOT; 0 knocks
-next, same idea with shifts @ 4k; 8 knocks
-then shifting to 4k, letting it drop to 2500, then back to 4k over and over, but with pedal floored to engage WOTS; 8 knocks
-finally the thrashed WOT, near redline; 18 knocks
-next, same idea with shifts @ 4k; 8 knocks
-then shifting to 4k, letting it drop to 2500, then back to 4k over and over, but with pedal floored to engage WOTS; 8 knocks
-finally the thrashed WOT, near redline; 18 knocks
#30
Rennlist Member