Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

flat plane crank conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2018 | 03:07 PM
  #1  
uraniummetallurgist's Avatar
uraniummetallurgist
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: West Vancouver, Canada
Default flat plane crank conversion

I've read the advantages of flat plane cranks versus conventional cross plane cranks- better scavenging, lighter mass, etc albeit at the expense of increased vibration. That said, I wonder if there would be any improvement/reduction in the oil consumption in my GTS motor due to the splashing and misting caused by the cross plane crank. It looks like the splashes per rpm would be half those of a cross plane but not sure if it really matter in mist formation due to the GTS' longer stroke.

I've had good success with a vacuum system but wanted to get advice on the use of a flat plane as I may some day want to open the motor up to drill oil drain holes for the pistons.

Thanks,

Joe
Old 09-28-2018 | 03:12 PM
  #2  
drnick's Avatar
drnick
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 2
From: New Zealand
Default

Joe, what kind of vacuum system are you running?
Old 09-28-2018 | 03:52 PM
  #3  
uraniummetallurgist's Avatar
uraniummetallurgist
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: West Vancouver, Canada
Default

Hi drnick:
I have one of Colin's early vacuum systems and am quite pleased wit it.

All the best,

Joe
Old 09-28-2018 | 04:02 PM
  #4  
Ducman82's Avatar
Ducman82
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,983
Likes: 18
From: Marysville WA
Default

i had that system as well. made my own AOS (air oil separator) as well. good breather baffling and that should be all you need. i never burned/sucked in any oil. flat plane would sound nice, but you are looking at re doing the ignition firing order as well. maybe even differently clocked cams due to the pistons orientation being changed? not sure, but i just read where a guy put a flat plane in a Z06... stupid expensive custom stuff. but it does sound nice.
Old 09-28-2018 | 04:29 PM
  #5  
uraniummetallurgist's Avatar
uraniummetallurgist
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: West Vancouver, Canada
Default

I must admit that I saw the same article this am and that's the motivation.............https://jalopnik.com/some-mad-genius...ank-1829362964

Happy 9/28 day!
Old 09-28-2018 | 04:39 PM
  #6  
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 2,243
From: Up Nort
Default

Originally Posted by Ducman82
but you are looking at re doing the ignition firing order as well. maybe even differently clocked cams due to the pistons orientation being changed?
Camshafts need to match the firing order.

So at bare minimum this would mean:
1. One off crank
2. One off set of cams - unless the blanks Colin had made could be made to work.
3. Standalone ECU

One thing to ponder, will this crank be designed around stock 928 rod bearings? If not, new rods are needed.

The 8 different length intake runners of the stock intake are bad enough with a stock engine and batch fire ignition / fuel. Going through all this work and keeping that would seem silly.

I love the idea just for the crazy sake of doing it.
Old 09-28-2018 | 06:05 PM
  #7  
76FJ55's Avatar
76FJ55
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 137
From: Grapevine, TX
Default

What about using 944 cams? As an inline 4 they are running a flat plane crank, so would have the correct lobe clocking for a flat plane 928 motor.
Old 09-29-2018 | 10:37 AM
  #8  
V2Rocket's Avatar
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,595
Likes: 665
From: Nashville, TN
Default

the firing order is still wrong as that cam is made for 4 firing events per cycle...you'd be firing 2 at TDC simultaneously

though i have wondered if a 944 crank could work for this in a 928 block since the bore pitch is the same. would need a lot of work to fit a 2nd rod on each journal though (or get skinny rods)

though really, if you could jam a set of "180-degree" headers under a 928 body it would give you all of the sound and power benefits without having to change crank/cams/etc.

Last edited by V2Rocket; 09-29-2018 at 11:59 AM.
Old 09-29-2018 | 11:18 AM
  #9  
SwayBar's Avatar
SwayBar
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,608
Likes: 363
From: Chicago Bears
Default

Originally Posted by uraniummetallurgist
I've read the advantages of flat plane cranks versus conventional cross plane cranks- better scavenging, lighter mass, etc albeit at the expense of increased vibration. That said, I wonder if there would be any improvement/reduction in the oil consumption in my GTS motor due to the splashing and misting caused by the cross plane crank. It looks like the splashes per rpm would be half those of a cross plane but not sure if it really matter in mist formation due to the GTS' longer stroke.

I've had good success with a vacuum system but wanted to get advice on the use of a flat plane as I may some day want to open the motor up to drill oil drain holes for the pistons.
If you were serious about this, you'd be much better off buying a fully-sorted factory flat-plane crank engine such as the Ford Voodoo used in the GT350/GT350R from eBay along with its ECU.
Old 09-29-2018 | 11:34 AM
  #10  
uraniummetallurgist's Avatar
uraniummetallurgist
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: West Vancouver, Canada
Default

That is certainly a consideration. I could do the swap and have my GTS motor to boot.
Old 09-29-2018 | 12:10 PM
  #11  
SwayBar's Avatar
SwayBar
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,608
Likes: 363
From: Chicago Bears
Default

Originally Posted by SwayBar
If you were serious about this, you'd be much better off buying a fully-sorted factory flat-plane crank engine such as the Ford Voodoo used in the GT350/GT350R from eBay along with its ECU.
Here's an excellent article showing the many things the Ford engineering team did building the engine.

Ford Voodoo Development...

Like Erik stated, there's a lot more to it than 'simply' changing the crank.
Old 09-29-2018 | 12:22 PM
  #12  
Bigfoot928's Avatar
Bigfoot928
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 297
Default

you would be better off making headers to make it scavenge like a flat plane motor. It's been done before. The best person to pose this question to would be Bob Norwood. I can ask him next week about the gains from converting the 928 V8 to a flat plane..
Old 09-29-2018 | 03:30 PM
  #13  
slate blue's Avatar
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,318
Likes: 19
Default

As a person who does crazy projects, you'd be out of your mind to do this. �� The power gain if any is very very minimal. It's been tried in Nascar and it wasn't worth the effort. What you want is lighter parts and more revs with better breathing. The 928 engine is built like a truck motor, everything is heavy, do what Sterling says or what I'm doing is similar, which is a tri-y setup.
Old 09-29-2018 | 03:47 PM
  #14  
ptuomov's Avatar
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 82
From: MA
Default

What's the theory that crankcase gas flows would improve with the flat plane crank compared to a cross-plane crank?
Old 09-29-2018 | 03:59 PM
  #15  
icsamerica's Avatar
icsamerica
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 830
Likes: 311
From: New York City
Default

Its a novelty. Nothing more. The 2 valve SS camaro with a cross plane still bests the 4 valve flat plane Mustang is almost every performance metric.

No doubt a flat plane is cool but for all practical purposes it justs a novelty.

Cant we just leave well enough alone....928s are fine and quite enjoyable as built...upgraded parts from later model are cool but when you start with sillynesss like custom cranks and cams you run the risk of ruining the car and making a 1 off noone else cares about and in the process spending more money for a lesser result.

In short...if you want a flat plane buy a mustang...it will be cheaper, perform better than a homebrew and actually worth something when you are done playing with it.


Quick Reply: flat plane crank conversion



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:11 AM.