Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1989 951 vs BMW M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2017, 01:32 PM
  #46  
Todd951968
Burning Brakes
 
Todd951968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The E30 M3 was a "homologation special". Think Carrera RS vs normal 911 from the 1970's. The 951 is just the premium model within the standard 944 line, like the other M models from the 80's (M5 and M6). These cars are valued higher than the standard models but nothing like the homo car.

I bet if Porsche made an official 951RS for the street it would be up there with the M3 in terms of value.

Perhaps, in the minds of people a "Spec" car is a STREET car that is RACED. Whereas, a "homologation " car is a RACE CAR that the manufacturer had to build X number of "TAMED RACECAR" versions for the street in order to qualify.
Old 06-15-2017, 02:14 PM
  #47  
ian
Nordschleife Master
 
ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 5,693
Received 65 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

I just don't think that argument holds water when there are many other homologation specials that are considerably more rare than the E30 M3 that don't have the crazy surge in prices that they do.

- 190E 16v
- Sierra Cosworth (Escort Cosworth)
- Delta Integrale
- UR Quattro
- 323 GTX
- Celica GT4


The E30 M3 is not rare, they made 16,000 of them, yet they are treated like unicorns, again I say it is all down to hype.
Old 06-15-2017, 03:41 PM
  #48  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Delta integrale is also a much meaner machine Id have one over m3 any day.

It beat everybody to pulp in its time e30 m3 can't hold a candle to it.

The car was introduced for the 1987 World Rally Championship season and dominated the World Rally Championship, scoring 46 WRC victories overall and winning the constructors' championship a record six times in a row from 1987 to 1992, in addition to drivers' championship titles for Juha Kankkunen (1987 and 1991) and Miki Biasion (1988 and 1989), making Lancia the most successful marque in the history of the WRC and the Delta the most successful car.
Old 06-15-2017, 05:24 PM
  #49  
StoogeMoe
Rennlist Member
 
StoogeMoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Poconos PA
Posts: 2,784
Received 135 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
Delta integrale is also a much meaner machine Id have one over m3 any day.

It beat everybody to pulp in its time e30 m3 can't hold a candle to it.
Well yeah. It was a four wheel drive rally car in group B. The E30 M3 was group A. Apples and oranges. Totally different class.
Old 06-15-2017, 06:10 PM
  #50  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

This is after group B where dominating force was delta s4. Lancia delta HF integrale is group A rally car and it blasted trough WRC much more dominant and non compromising than e30m3 did in touring championships. e30m3 also rallied alongside delta where it was beaten to pulp.

E30 is superbly balanced, robust while lightweight car, but 944 beats it in those respects, and so does lancia and some other cars too.

Just look at this majestic machine. La macchina bella!


Last edited by Voith; 06-15-2017 at 06:28 PM.
Old 06-15-2017, 09:10 PM
  #51  
951and944S
Race Car
 
951and944S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Orleans/Baton Rouge
Posts: 3,930
Received 65 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
This is after group B where dominating force was delta s4. Lancia delta HF integrale is group A rally car and it blasted trough WRC much more dominant and non compromising than e30m3 did in touring championships. e30m3 also rallied alongside delta where it was beaten to pulp.

E30 is superbly balanced, robust while lightweight car, but 944 beats it in those respects, and so does lancia and some other cars too.

Just look at this majestic machine. La macchina bella!
Now that you've gone full OT, here's me dream weekend track machine -

Speaking of DOMINATION...!





T
Old 06-15-2017, 10:03 PM
  #52  
StoogeMoe
Rennlist Member
 
StoogeMoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Poconos PA
Posts: 2,784
Received 135 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 951and944S
Now that you've gone full OT, here's me dream weekend track machine -

Speaking of DOMINATION...!





T
Isn't it funny how nobody is dreaming about being in a 951. Lol
Old 06-15-2017, 10:24 PM
  #53  
951and944S
Race Car
 
951and944S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Orleans/Baton Rouge
Posts: 3,930
Received 65 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StoogeMoe
Isn't it funny how nobody is dreaming about being in a 951. Lol
Or a Spec E30......

Really though, you missed my user handle I guess. And basically, everybody participating already owns a 951.

A good ways back when a few of the Audi engined 951 projects started popping up, I was doing serious research on building a Quattro replica but body parts are practically non existent.

A friend of mine in Ireland warned me off the project.

There's a really crazy documented build a guy did in Europe where he wire framed the whole thing out and patch welded steel sheet until he had the whole body done. Looked like it must have weighed a couple of tons though...

T
Old 06-16-2017, 03:04 AM
  #54  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

My neigbhour has engine from one of imsa audis.
Old 06-19-2017, 09:34 AM
  #55  
EVOMMM
Rennlist Member
 
EVOMMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY NY
Posts: 4,104
Received 1,648 Likes on 964 Posts
Default

I think you guys are getting off que the lancia and Audi were dominate race cars as was the ford cosworths but these are turbo charged cars who were so fast they were banned or regulated out they also had very little with there street versions the m3 raced for years! Even after production ended it also won the Corsica rally in Wrc the comparison with the 951 is valid in the same grouping of the period but one was a race car the other a trans continental bruiser. the 951 was also $6k more expensive
Old 06-19-2017, 10:24 AM
  #56  
ventoGT
Three Wheelin'
 
ventoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 1,416
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lots of cars are ridiculously priced right now...methinks a correction will come soon. Look at Ferrari 308s for christ's sake--ridiculous values over the past year and would get smoked by a Camry today. I like the e30 M3 but not as much as the e34 M5, the best all around car I have ever owned to date [and still priced within reason, but probably not for long].
Old 06-19-2017, 10:42 AM
  #57  
ian
Nordschleife Master
 
ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 5,693
Received 65 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NYPOWR4
I think you guys are getting off que the lancia and Audi were dominate race cars as was the ford cosworths but these are turbo charged cars who were so fast they were banned or regulated out they also had very little with there street versions the m3 raced for years! Even after production ended it also won the Corsica rally in Wrc the comparison with the 951 is valid in the same grouping of the period but one was a race car the other a trans continental bruiser. the 951 was also $6k more expensive

Lets be clear, the E30 M3 won 1 group N tarmac rally. Hardly a significant win, was just a random footnote more than anything.

And the Cosworth and Audi I am thinking of (both DTM cars) shared as much in common with their street car brethren as the E30 M3 and 190E 16v.
Old 06-19-2017, 07:39 PM
  #58  
gmgracing
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
gmgracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,306
Received 443 Likes on 264 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StoogeMoe
I was just talking with some E30 guys yesterday and they all know others or have them with engine swaps. They said the ones with the original M20B25 get all the attention now. Funny how what's cool changes.

Poor BeerBurner, if you would have gone with the M3E30 it would be worth four times that now.
Stooge, I'm sure we have a few friends in common.

I'll drop my toe in here. A stock 2.3L S14 engine is (as others have said) pretty wheezy, a bit like the modern Honda F20 engine in the S2000. However, in evo-trim (2.5L) it is pretty fun, the extra displacement really helps fill in the mid-range power.

That being said, the M20B25 in the SpecE30 cars, is another great engine that is (for now) often overlooked. I've developed a number of stroker kits for them which definitely turns it into a hotrod. Dimensionally they aren't all that different from the old Datsun L-block engines.

This little 2.9L is going into my 2002....


-Andrew
__________________


sales@gmgracing.com
www.gmgracing.com

714.432.1582
facebook l instagram l youtube l twitter

Porsche | Audi | Ferrari | Lamborghini | McLaren
Performance Tuning | Motorsport | Factory Service

Pirelli World Challege Race Team GT/GTA/GTS/TC
Pirelli GT3 Cup Trophy USA
Porsche Motorsport — Audi Sport Customer Racing — Lamborghini Super Trofeo Series
Old 06-20-2017, 12:58 AM
  #59  
Oddjob
Rennlist Member
 
Oddjob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Midwest - US
Posts: 4,650
Received 68 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Maybe I'm getting old and my memory is fading, but I don't remember E30 M3's being close in performance to an 88TS or 89T on track. Weren't they about 190 hp?

They raced in the IMSA Firestone Firehawk series in the GS class with the 944S2's, and were not competitive against the S2's.

The E36 M3s were capable of a similar pace on track as 89 951s.

The E36 M3 lightweights were similar to 87+ Turbo Cup/Escort cars in performance.
Old 06-20-2017, 01:27 AM
  #60  
ried
Racer
 
ried's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: California
Posts: 481
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

There's no comparison. E30 M3 has less power, less torque, is slower to both 100 kph and 200 kph, and has a lower top speed.

http://fastestlaps.com/models/porsche-944-turbo-s
http://fastestlaps.com/models/bmw-m3-e30

I'm sure the M3 EVO closes the gap a bit, but performance just isn't on par with a 951S.


Quick Reply: 1989 951 vs BMW M3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:28 AM.