944/951 suspension height
#17
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 7,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by adrial
Pete, Sit in the car and see if the front end becomes level.
Pete, Sit in the car and see if the front end becomes level.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I guess this is a good reason not to go on a diet.
#18
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Jason @ Paragon Products
Shortyboy, the M474 package will not give you ride height adjustment on the front and since the Koni adjustment is for rebound only that won't help you with ride height as well. If the PO cut the stock springs you should replace them with either stock or an aftermarket spring of your choice. There are also Adjustable Ride Height coil over kits that you can add to your car to give you M030 type of ride height adjustment.
1) Do S2s with M474 equipment have the same ride height as S2s with standard suspension ?
On S2s, M474 equipment features springs that are 11 mm shorter than springs of the standard suspension set up although they have the same stiffness. WM do not specify much about front ride height on S2s, either with or without M474 ...
In my experience, fitting M474 Koni shocks with base suspension springs results to increasing front ride height.
2) Does that mean lower spring perches are actually positoned "higher" on M474 Koni struts than on base suspension Sachs struts ?
I should have measured when I replaced the shocks ...
Many thanks in advance.
(PS : base suspension springs on my S2 were replaced with 968 CS springs since, but that has no influence on my two questions above)
Last edited by Thom; 01-18-2005 at 09:39 AM.
#19
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: A suburb of Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
3 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ride height is important for ground clearance, suspension geometry, suspension travel, ball joint movement limitations (which is what causes catastrophic failures), lower center of gravity, aerodynamics, ect, ect, and I guess looks. That is if anyone can see with their eyes a 1/4" difference. As long as you are not lower than the limits Porsche recomends for the stock suspension, what is more important than making all corner measurements "equal" is corner balance.
Corner balancing is the method used to get each wheel supporting as close to the same amount of weight on each tire. This is done by raising or lowering each corner. A properly corner balanced car will handle better, but will not necessarily have "equal" height measurements.
Chassis can flex, body panels can move, suspensions can droop, tires wear uneven, all can influence a measurement. The most accurate method is to put each tire on a scale, and corner balance.
Corner balancing is the method used to get each wheel supporting as close to the same amount of weight on each tire. This is done by raising or lowering each corner. A properly corner balanced car will handle better, but will not necessarily have "equal" height measurements.
Chassis can flex, body panels can move, suspensions can droop, tires wear uneven, all can influence a measurement. The most accurate method is to put each tire on a scale, and corner balance.