Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

n/a head potential

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2015, 07:11 AM
  #16  
MAGK944
Nordschleife Master
 
MAGK944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,769
Received 298 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noahs944
Does anyone have an idea of what hp/torque potential exists on a 2.5 head?
Sleeve the block and fit a stroked 3.0 crank to get you to around 3.2, fit some HC pistons, better cam, better engine management, 48mm intake valves, flow intake & head and that 2.5 8v head should net you over 250.
Old 04-04-2015, 09:36 AM
  #17  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,008
Received 92 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FrenchToast
Headwork alone, idk.

Custom work on the whole engine, from internals to management, can net about a max of 275 fwhp.

No, I don't have the dyno sheets to prove it.

...........Yea, I'm that guy who randomly posts in these threads claiming these numbers. I'm sure no one believes it anyway, so whatever!
Yes, 275 hp is easily attained in an NA engine if you add a turbo or super charger. But it's not going to happen with an NA engine alone unless you spin it up to 10k RPM. Oh, and you're probably going to have to spend $100k plus.


Originally Posted by MAGK944
Sleeve the block and fit a stroked 3.0 crank to get you to around 3.2, fit some HC pistons, better cam, better engine management, 48mm intake valves, flow intake & head and that 2.5 8v head should net you over 250.
Mike and I are usually in agreement, but not this time... A 968 engine makes 235 hp - that's a 3 liter, 16-valve, variocam engine - and still it's 15 hp shy of the 250 mark. If you want 250 at the wheels, you need 300 fwhp... There are S2 and 968 engines making that (looking towards Michael Mount), but these are sky-is-the-limit-for-budget builds.


It's easy to spend $10k building an engine that's still a 2.5 (legal for 944 cup racing) and only get 145 whp - which would be about 175 hp at the crank.

If costs rise exponentially for this kind of performance, I can only imagine what it would take to get another 100 hp.
Old 04-04-2015, 09:53 AM
  #18  
MAGK944
Nordschleife Master
 
MAGK944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,769
Received 298 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Van
...Mike and I are usually in agreement, but not this time... A 968 engine makes 235 hp - that's a 3 liter, 16-valve, variocam engine - and still it's 15 hp shy of the 250 mark....
idk, I think the 968 leaves a lot on the table. An extra 200cc, bump that compression up to 12:1, a decent engine management with sequential direct ignition like Electomotive. Extrude hone the intake, flow the 2.5 head with larger intake valves, imo it would be quite close.

Yes the 968 head flows better, but we are not aiming for 350+ hp engine here, just the best surroundings to make max hp out of a 2.5na head.

Still quite a pointless excersize, building an engine around the limitations of the cylinder head, just a bit of tech fun! You are basically trying to build a big air pump around an air restrictor.
Old 04-04-2015, 10:45 AM
  #19  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

I love the idea of a fire breathing 4 popper. I think Milledge make 230 hp (fw I assume) outta the 2.5... but that's probably $25000+ us.

Thanks for the responses. Please continue to add! I'll just read & learn.

Since my original enquiry I have decided to (after the fall autox season)
-get turbo valve springs.
-port & polish
-47mm intake valves
-MAF
-fabricate ram air duct

Also with the head off, will measure. Considering shaving the head more & fly cutting the pistons, but knock is already a concern (with 10.2:1 !!!).
Old 04-04-2015, 02:00 PM
  #20  
Per vers
Instructor
 
Per vers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bornholm. Denmark
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Here is the result off a couple of days in the workshop.

My car is a -82 944 n/a. Engine from -88. Euro spec.
Portet head. (Home made)
Balance shaft delete.
280* DBilas camshaft.
Turbo valve springs.
Tommibillets cam adj.
Dansk Rear tail pipe.
Stil on original DME and MAF. (Megasquirt comming soon)

Dyno result before: 97 kw. (132 hk) on Wheels at 6000 rpm.
Dyno result after: 117 kw. (159 hk) on weehls at 6200 rpm.
At 2000 rpm. + 5 kw.
At 3000 rpm. + 7 kw.
At 4000 rpm. +10 kw.
At 5000 rpm. + 14 kw.

Regards Per
Old 04-04-2015, 02:57 PM
  #21  
H.F.B.
Pro
 
H.F.B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 551
Received 99 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MAGK944
idk, I think the 968 leaves a lot on the table. An extra 200cc, bump that compression up to 12:1, a decent engine management with sequential direct ignition like Electomotive. Extrude hone the intake, flow the 2.5 head with larger intake valves, imo it would be quite close.

Yes the 968 head flows better, but we are not aiming for 350+ hp engine here, just the best surroundings to make max hp out of a 2.5na head.

Still quite a pointless excersize, building an engine around the limitations of the cylinder head, just a bit of tech fun! You are basically trying to build a big air pump around an air restrictor.
On a 968, a simple airbox mod resulted in dyno proven 10 hp. Just have look at the attached pdf..

Last edited by H.F.B.; 09-19-2015 at 03:42 PM.
Old 04-04-2015, 03:05 PM
  #22  
H.F.B.
Pro
 
H.F.B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 551
Received 99 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MAGK944
Sleeve the block and fit a stroked 3.0 crank to get you to around 3.2, fit some HC pistons, better cam, better engine management, 48mm intake valves, flow intake & head and that 2.5 8v head should net you over 250.
and here is another good example that shows what's possible with the knowledge and technology of the 21st century
944 S2 280 bhp upgrade (click below)
https://rennlist.com/forums/944-and-...l#post12169976
Old 04-04-2015, 03:46 PM
  #23  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Per vers
Here is the result off a couple of days in the workshop.

My car is a -82 944 n/a. Engine from -88. Euro spec.
Portet head. (Home made)
Balance shaft delete.
280* DBilas camshaft.
Turbo valve springs.
Tommibillets cam adj.
Dansk Rear tail pipe.
Stil on original DME and MAF. (Megasquirt comming soon)

Dyno result before: 97 kw. (132 hk) on Wheels at 6000 rpm.
Dyno result after: 117 kw. (159 hk) on weehls at 6200 rpm.
At 2000 rpm. + 5 kw.
At 3000 rpm. + 7 kw.
At 4000 rpm. +10 kw.
At 5000 rpm. + 14 kw.

Regards Per
Conversion chart: http://www.rapidtables.com/convert/power/kw-to-hp.htm
Before: 130 HP/After: 159 HP at wheels. Big improvements for that old Porsche!
HUGE THANKS Per for providing real dyno stats. So the '88 is about 162 HP normally (when new) so we lose 30 HP through the drive train in these cars. Good to know!
Old 04-04-2015, 10:48 PM
  #24  
Arominus
Race Car
 
Arominus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noahs944
I love the idea of a fire breathing 4 popper. I think Milledge make 230 hp (fw I assume) outta the 2.5... but that's probably $25000+ us.

Thanks for the responses. Please continue to add! I'll just read & learn.

Since my original enquiry I have decided to (after the fall autox season)
-get turbo valve springs.
-port & polish
-47mm intake valves
-MAF
-fabricate ram air duct

Also with the head off, will measure. Considering shaving the head more & fly cutting the pistons, but knock is already a concern (with 10.2:1 !!!).
You'll still get more just by bolting a 944S head onto your motor or finding an S motor, it flows considerably better than even a ported 8v head and is a bolt on. You just need a set of S pistons and an S or S2 intake/header and your off. 188HP to start with and 10.9:1 Compression. My 944S with 170k miles on it put down 160hp to the wheels (corrected for altitude). It gained 10hp with the MAF/tune i was testing at the time.
Old 04-04-2015, 11:41 PM
  #25  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Arominus
You'll still get more just by bolting a 944S head onto your motor or finding an S motor, it flows considerably better than even a ported 8v head and is a bolt on. You just need a set of S pistons and an S or S2 intake/header and your off. 188HP to start with and 10.9:1 Compression. My 944S with 170k miles on it put down 160hp to the wheels (corrected for altitude). It gained 10hp with the MAF/tune i was testing at the time.
YES. The S engine has alot of appeal & I looked into this after driving my friend's S. It was so smooth! I only got little 100 mm bores though brother.
Old 04-05-2015, 05:54 AM
  #26  
Per vers
Instructor
 
Per vers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bornholm. Denmark
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I to would like an S.
But her in Denmark, they are wery rare, and expensive. Spareparts are also wery hart to come by.
8 valves are allover the place. Only problem is high milage.

Regards Per
Old 04-05-2015, 08:40 AM
  #27  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Head, pistons and intake + work and you are on $5k easy. You can buy complete S car for 5k.

Last edited by Voith; 04-05-2015 at 09:39 AM.
Old 04-05-2015, 12:57 PM
  #28  
Arominus
Race Car
 
Arominus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noahs944
YES. The S engine has alot of appeal & I looked into this after driving my friend's S. It was so smooth! I only got little 100 mm bores though brother.
The S uses the standard 2.5 block, exactly the same as what you have. Same bores!

Voith is right though, buying an S might even be a better option, i sold mine for 5k.
Old 04-05-2015, 03:22 PM
  #29  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Arominus,

I just spent the last hour searching the net to try & prove you wrong. I stand corrected! You are right!! That's great news bud.
Old 05-24-2015, 05:16 AM
  #30  
mattipuh
Rennlist Member
 
mattipuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 465
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

We got 196hp (engine) with no work to the head expect different camshaft.



Quick Reply: n/a head potential



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:29 PM.