ATTN: John Anderson
11-15-2001, 11:05 AM
#16
AutoX
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, I'm up now,...
Takin' low blows while I'm sleepin', huh?
Well, I already told you about the traction problem. I think it gat addressed well enough. My point: I'm happy to even be in the same category as an $80k sportscar. The Viper is born to do what I'm struggling to be a part of. So, when I get to race a Viper, I'll first bow down to the person that spends $80k on a car, and then point at the timeslip that embarrased them, and tell them "you don't have to spend $80k to go that fast".
Takin' low blows while I'm sleepin', huh?
Well, I already told you about the traction problem. I think it gat addressed well enough. My point: I'm happy to even be in the same category as an $80k sportscar. The Viper is born to do what I'm struggling to be a part of. So, when I get to race a Viper, I'll first bow down to the person that spends $80k on a car, and then point at the timeslip that embarrased them, and tell them "you don't have to spend $80k to go that fast".
11-15-2001, 11:25 AM
#17
Addict
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
You know I love to go over the the Camero boards and run my mouth, it's a blast.
Let us know how much you put into that beast, will you? Camero SS's are fast, I have driven one, but I don't really like it.
Fast doesn't mean nice. If I wanted a plastic car I would have bought one.
And 511 at the wheels and only 12 sec 1/4 mile? That doesn't add up.
Anyone know Steve Kaspar's Monster 911? My guess is that thing would swallow that SS whole.
Just my thoughts in response to someone with something to prove and no where to prove it. Go to the rice boy forums, you may get a rise out of some of them. Personally, you are a funny guy. Pathetic, but funny.
-Matt
Let us know how much you put into that beast, will you? Camero SS's are fast, I have driven one, but I don't really like it.
Fast doesn't mean nice. If I wanted a plastic car I would have bought one.
And 511 at the wheels and only 12 sec 1/4 mile? That doesn't add up.
Anyone know Steve Kaspar's Monster 911? My guess is that thing would swallow that SS whole.
Just my thoughts in response to someone with something to prove and no where to prove it. Go to the rice boy forums, you may get a rise out of some of them. Personally, you are a funny guy. Pathetic, but funny.
-Matt
11-15-2001, 11:58 AM
#18
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had to save some face for the 951 owners out there.We know Rob and he is a cool guy.Maybe he has a little turbo envy to work out with his shrink though;^) Maybe you should talk to the kid who works at Huntley and ask him about getting is *** kicked by John.His 96' Mustang SVT Cobra has a built bottom-end, heads, everything you mentioned and then some, plus a 175 shot of NOS and he didnt even have a chance and John only ran 10 psi!!!!! This Rustang dynoed at 338 N/A and 436 on the bottle.Still not enough! I doubt your car has made numbers like this.
I think this post mas meant for a laugh because that is what we will be doing when Rob is eatin some rubber from the 951's tires! Hey Rob, remember that Johns car made 515 ft/lbs of torque at the wheels at a mere 18 psi! I know this is more then your sorry *** Comaro could muster up, even with a 200 shot of NOS!
Unfortunately, Johns car is waiting for a new turbo right now.Hopefully with his new turbo and a few other little tricks his car can make even more power which will definitely be useful for kicking your *** at the track.The bad news, or good news for me, is that John A isnt that familiar on launcing his car so I will have to drive for him. Anyways we will give you and James a jingle when his car is back on the road.We also have the red beast here that is almost finished.This car makes serious power and torque and has the suspension, clutch and brakes too match.I am pretty certain there is nothing on the road(unless they can make in excess of 500 horsepower at the wheels and are just as light this 86'-2800 lbs) that could even think of rivaling this particular car, especially your weak GM crap of a car, the Camaro;^)Take care buddy.
Tim
86 951 http://www.speedforceracing.com
I think this post mas meant for a laugh because that is what we will be doing when Rob is eatin some rubber from the 951's tires! Hey Rob, remember that Johns car made 515 ft/lbs of torque at the wheels at a mere 18 psi! I know this is more then your sorry *** Comaro could muster up, even with a 200 shot of NOS!
Unfortunately, Johns car is waiting for a new turbo right now.Hopefully with his new turbo and a few other little tricks his car can make even more power which will definitely be useful for kicking your *** at the track.The bad news, or good news for me, is that John A isnt that familiar on launcing his car so I will have to drive for him. Anyways we will give you and James a jingle when his car is back on the road.We also have the red beast here that is almost finished.This car makes serious power and torque and has the suspension, clutch and brakes too match.I am pretty certain there is nothing on the road(unless they can make in excess of 500 horsepower at the wheels and are just as light this 86'-2800 lbs) that could even think of rivaling this particular car, especially your weak GM crap of a car, the Camaro;^)Take care buddy.
Tim
86 951 http://www.speedforceracing.com
11-15-2001, 12:03 PM
#19
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rob, your so full of crap! Your car has not made 520 horsepower at the wheels.There is no way.I can do some simple math and determine that your injectors cannot support this type of horepower without your car going kaboom. You would need at least a 48 lb/hr injector to make that type of horsepower and your 28lb/hr specials just arent going to cut it. BTW, I have a crisp $100 bill that says your car wont even break 420 at the wheels on the bottle.Hey man the dyno is just down the road;^)
Tim
86 951 http://www.speedforcracing.com
Tim
86 951 http://www.speedforcracing.com
11-15-2001, 12:30 PM
#20
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TurboTim:
<STRONG>You would need at least a 48 lb/hr injector to make that type of horsepower and your 28lb/hr specials just arent going to cut it.</STRONG>
<STRONG>You would need at least a 48 lb/hr injector to make that type of horsepower and your 28lb/hr specials just arent going to cut it.</STRONG>
-Steve
Originally posted by Robs PorschekillerSS:
<STRONG>28 lb. injectors, and a NOS inline fuel pump(+stock in-tank).
Oh, I almost forgot,..... and 150 of my closest wet friends in the trunk area, just itchin' to race whatever happens to pull up to the nearest stoplight.</STRONG>
<STRONG>28 lb. injectors, and a NOS inline fuel pump(+stock in-tank).
Oh, I almost forgot,..... and 150 of my closest wet friends in the trunk area, just itchin' to race whatever happens to pull up to the nearest stoplight.</STRONG>
11-15-2001, 12:41 PM
#21
AutoX
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steve, thank you for reminding Tim of the obvious. I don't think I had the Inline fuel pump the last time I seen Tim. Yes, the car had a hard time handling the dry setup, but now I can run rich, due to the NOS inline fuel pump.
Tim, NO. You cannot drive. John has the challenge, and he will complete it. If he can beat the Cobra, he can supposedly beat me just as easy. What's he worried about, this should be easy, right?
Second, the Mustang he ran is a bad example. I eat worked Mustangs all day, every day. You'll see the difference why Camaro's are still kicking every Mustang's *** on the road.
Third, does this red 951 have a similar engine as the one you blew up on the dyno? (James had to remind me...)
Tim, NO. You cannot drive. John has the challenge, and he will complete it. If he can beat the Cobra, he can supposedly beat me just as easy. What's he worried about, this should be easy, right?
Second, the Mustang he ran is a bad example. I eat worked Mustangs all day, every day. You'll see the difference why Camaro's are still kicking every Mustang's *** on the road.
Third, does this red 951 have a similar engine as the one you blew up on the dyno? (James had to remind me...)
11-15-2001, 01:36 PM
#22
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steve,
I only made my statement after seeing what Rob actually had on his car.He was running a dry system when I seen the car.Take care.
Tim
86 951 http://www.speedforceracing.com
I only made my statement after seeing what Rob actually had on his car.He was running a dry system when I seen the car.Take care.
Tim
86 951 http://www.speedforceracing.com
11-15-2001, 01:42 PM
#23
AutoX
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's OK Tim. Here's a great big Interet Hug for you. We're just playing around all in good fun. It has been funny, right?
I'm still going to Carlsbad this weekend.
P.S., You still don't get to drive the car, and have your batteries gone dead in that little calculator of yours yet?
I'm still going to Carlsbad this weekend.
P.S., You still don't get to drive the car, and have your batteries gone dead in that little calculator of yours yet?
11-15-2001, 04:07 PM
#24
AutoX
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, here's something James found, and sent to me a while back. Enjoy....
YR CAR 0-60mph 1/4 mile
1968 Porsche 911 Sportomatic 10.3 17.3
>1981 Porsche 911 SC 6.7 N/A
>1983 Porsche 911 SC Cabrio 7.0 15.5
>1984 Porsche 911 Carrera 6.2 14.6
>1986 Porsche 911 Cabriolet 5.7 14.3
>1986 Porsche 911 Turbo 5.0 13.4
>1989 Porsche 911 Cabriolet 6.5 15.0
>1989 Porsche 911 Club Sport 5.7 14.3
>1989 Porsche 911 Speedster 6.0 14.7
>1989 Porsche 911 Turbo 5.1 13.6
>1990 Porsche 911 Carrera 2 5.4 14.0
>1990 Porsche 911 Speedster 6.0 14.5
>1991 Porsche 911 Carrera 2 Tiptronic (auto) 6.9 15.0
>1991 Porsche 911 Turbo 4.9 13.4
>1993 Porsche 911 RS America 5.3 13.8
>1993 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6 4.4 12.7
>1994 Porsche 911 Carrera 5.2 13.8
>1994 Porsche 911 Speedster 5.4 14.0
>1994 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6 4.5 12.9
>1995 Porsche 911 Cabriolet 6.4 14.5
>1995 Porsche 911 Carrera 5.3 13.8
>1996 Porsche 911 Targa 5.0 13.5
>1996 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.7 12.1
>1997 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.7 12.3
>1997 Porsche 911 Turbo S 3.6 11.9
>1999 Porsche 911 Carrera 4.9 13.4
>
>1970 Porsche 914 13.9 19.2
>1973 Porsche 914 12.5 18.1
>1973 Porsche 914S 10.5 17.0
>1974 Porsche 914 2.0 8.9 16.7
>
>1976 Porsche 924 12.6 18.5
>1980 Porsche 924 10.6 N/A
>1980 Porsche 924 Turbo 9.3 17.0
>1980 Porsche 924 S 9.8 17.1
>1982 Porsche 924 Turbo 9.2 N/A
>1987 Porsche 924 S 7.8 15.8
>1988 Porsche 924 S 8.5 16.4
>
>1977 Porsche 928 6.7 15.2
>1978 Porsche 928 7.0 N/A
>1980 Porsche 928 7.4 15.8
>1982 Porsche 928 8.1 N/A
>1984 Porsche 928 S 7.0 15.4
>1985 Porsche 928 S 5.9 14.2
>1986 Porsche 928 S 6.3 14.7
>1987 Porsche 928 S4 5.5 13.9
>1991 Porsche 928 GT 5.9 14.3
>1991 Porsche 928 S4 6.2 14.7
>1993 Porsche 928 GTS 6.1 14.5
>
>1979 Porsche 930 Turbo 5.0 N/A
>
>1982 Porsche 944 8.3 N/A
>1984 Porsche 944 9.0 16.4
>1986 Porsche 944 8.9 16.6
>1986 Porsche 944 Turbo 6.0 14.6
>1988 Porsche 944 8.7 16.6
>1988 Porsche 944 S 8.0 16.2
>1988 Porsche 944 Turbo 6.6 15.1
>1988 Porsche 944 Turbo S 5.5 14.2
>1989 Porsche 944 7.5 15.7
>1989 Porsche 944 S2 6.6 14.9
>1990 Porsche 944 S2 6.7 14.7
>
>1992 Porsche 968 5.9 14.4
>1993 Porsche 968 6.6 14.9
>
>1997 Porsche Boxster 6.0 14.5
>
>1989 Porsche Carrera 4 5.5 13.9
>1993 Porsche Carrera 2 Cabr. 6.0 14.4
>
>1991 Porsche Turbo 4.6 12.9
>
YR CAR 0-60mph 1/4 mile
1968 Porsche 911 Sportomatic 10.3 17.3
>1981 Porsche 911 SC 6.7 N/A
>1983 Porsche 911 SC Cabrio 7.0 15.5
>1984 Porsche 911 Carrera 6.2 14.6
>1986 Porsche 911 Cabriolet 5.7 14.3
>1986 Porsche 911 Turbo 5.0 13.4
>1989 Porsche 911 Cabriolet 6.5 15.0
>1989 Porsche 911 Club Sport 5.7 14.3
>1989 Porsche 911 Speedster 6.0 14.7
>1989 Porsche 911 Turbo 5.1 13.6
>1990 Porsche 911 Carrera 2 5.4 14.0
>1990 Porsche 911 Speedster 6.0 14.5
>1991 Porsche 911 Carrera 2 Tiptronic (auto) 6.9 15.0
>1991 Porsche 911 Turbo 4.9 13.4
>1993 Porsche 911 RS America 5.3 13.8
>1993 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6 4.4 12.7
>1994 Porsche 911 Carrera 5.2 13.8
>1994 Porsche 911 Speedster 5.4 14.0
>1994 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6 4.5 12.9
>1995 Porsche 911 Cabriolet 6.4 14.5
>1995 Porsche 911 Carrera 5.3 13.8
>1996 Porsche 911 Targa 5.0 13.5
>1996 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.7 12.1
>1997 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.7 12.3
>1997 Porsche 911 Turbo S 3.6 11.9
>1999 Porsche 911 Carrera 4.9 13.4
>
>1970 Porsche 914 13.9 19.2
>1973 Porsche 914 12.5 18.1
>1973 Porsche 914S 10.5 17.0
>1974 Porsche 914 2.0 8.9 16.7
>
>1976 Porsche 924 12.6 18.5
>1980 Porsche 924 10.6 N/A
>1980 Porsche 924 Turbo 9.3 17.0
>1980 Porsche 924 S 9.8 17.1
>1982 Porsche 924 Turbo 9.2 N/A
>1987 Porsche 924 S 7.8 15.8
>1988 Porsche 924 S 8.5 16.4
>
>1977 Porsche 928 6.7 15.2
>1978 Porsche 928 7.0 N/A
>1980 Porsche 928 7.4 15.8
>1982 Porsche 928 8.1 N/A
>1984 Porsche 928 S 7.0 15.4
>1985 Porsche 928 S 5.9 14.2
>1986 Porsche 928 S 6.3 14.7
>1987 Porsche 928 S4 5.5 13.9
>1991 Porsche 928 GT 5.9 14.3
>1991 Porsche 928 S4 6.2 14.7
>1993 Porsche 928 GTS 6.1 14.5
>
>1979 Porsche 930 Turbo 5.0 N/A
>
>1982 Porsche 944 8.3 N/A
>1984 Porsche 944 9.0 16.4
>1986 Porsche 944 8.9 16.6
>1986 Porsche 944 Turbo 6.0 14.6
>1988 Porsche 944 8.7 16.6
>1988 Porsche 944 S 8.0 16.2
>1988 Porsche 944 Turbo 6.6 15.1
>1988 Porsche 944 Turbo S 5.5 14.2
>1989 Porsche 944 7.5 15.7
>1989 Porsche 944 S2 6.6 14.9
>1990 Porsche 944 S2 6.7 14.7
>
>1992 Porsche 968 5.9 14.4
>1993 Porsche 968 6.6 14.9
>
>1997 Porsche Boxster 6.0 14.5
>
>1989 Porsche Carrera 4 5.5 13.9
>1993 Porsche Carrera 2 Cabr. 6.0 14.4
>
>1991 Porsche Turbo 4.6 12.9
>
11-15-2001, 07:12 PM
#28
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey SS,
Whats your weight again? And front/rear distribution of that too. Just curious. I just read that old funny car guys would chop the suspension work to put the rear axle Darn near in the middle of the car so most of the weight is on the drive wheels.
Later all, I'm going to work. That means I get to drive again.
Whats your weight again? And front/rear distribution of that too. Just curious. I just read that old funny car guys would chop the suspension work to put the rear axle Darn near in the middle of the car so most of the weight is on the drive wheels.
Later all, I'm going to work. That means I get to drive again.
11-15-2001, 07:38 PM
#29
Pro
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chester, NH
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is a tubro four. Turbo four banger The owner, a Dodge mechanic, probably spent less than my N/A 944. Doesn't mean that I want one.
Mark
Mark
