Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Would it be fair to say that Porsche hates the 944?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2011, 01:47 PM
  #31  
Stephencs601
Rennlist Member
 
Stephencs601's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Long Island
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

How dumd can they be, turning down cash flow. What does it matter which car it is, the way the economy is going, they should take whatever comes in. Financial morons as far as I am concerned.
Old 08-18-2011, 01:48 PM
  #32  
87 944 C
Drifting
 
87 944 C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northwest NJ
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the few times mine went to a dealer, they loved it, one of the salesmen had a 951, and the master tech had an s2, and up until about 5yrs ago techs were trained(not in depth, but enough) on cars all the way back to the 80's. the only downside to the dealer(really any shop) is wait time for parts. most of the dealers around here don't care what you drive, they're making money off it.

when i worked for bmw we had older 5's and 6's from the 80's in all the time, we had a tech who has been with bmw since 1983, he enjoyed the older one's.

btw: tire machine is about 3k

as or respect from others, i pulled into applebee's and parked next to a 930 carrera. i got out and he said you should've gotten a real porsche, i simply said you shouldn't talk about a car you know nothing about
Old 08-18-2011, 01:55 PM
  #33  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,498
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toran
The 944 aint nothing but a souped up VW...
the early ones are...and i love paying $20 for control arms

Originally Posted by pnbell
I 'accidentally' took my car to a Really Nice Race Shop when i first got it; They worked on it with no problem... I needed tires, but had them do the Belts, Front Seals, and Rollers too... $2,500 later!! Grrrrrrrr
if you lived in CA i'd have done it for you and saved you $2300...
Old 08-18-2011, 02:09 PM
  #34  
pnbell
Burning Brakes
 
pnbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ballston, VA
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
the early ones are...and i love paying $20 for control arms
if you lived in CA i'd have done it for you and saved you $2300...
As I said i re-did the job two months later... Since then i vowed to never return to a shop! It all started with a $400 quote for the belt; which was fine...

Just a stupid mistake on my part ; I am more than capable... this year alone i have done (in my apt parking lot) Lifters, Rod Bearings, Motor Mounts, Koni Inserts, and the Dreaded Clutch, just to name a few...
Old 08-18-2011, 02:25 PM
  #35  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

if you can undo a screw with a screwdriver im sure you can work on your own car...
Old 08-18-2011, 03:19 PM
  #36  
Olli Snellman
Race Car
 
Olli Snellman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Same here, official dealer does not want to service 944's any longer. Little bit same with independent service. So much Boxsters, 996's & 997's to deal with.
I have changed belts to 14 944/968 during this summer.....
Old 08-18-2011, 03:34 PM
  #37  
JDS968
Bannana Shine
Rennlist Member
 
JDS968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 21,055
Likes: 0
Received 334 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

I think the "front engined cars aren't real Porsches" argument is as retarded as the "rear engine placement is obsolete or a flaw, the 911 is only good in spite of it".

Rear engine placement has some excellent benefits. As long as the steering is in the front, the rear wheels are best used for drive power, and as long as drive power is directed to the rear wheels, hanging the engine over them gives you the best traction on corner exit, allowing you to get on the power sooner and be accelerating while the front and even mid engined cars are still coasting. If rear engine placement was the flaw that had to be corrected for, it would be the 911s that would get all of the "exemptions" to remain competitive in the ALMS GT class, not the other way around. And even with the mid and front engined cars getting all the "cheats", they still lose to the 911s year after year.

Yes, it means more potential for spins, but if you want a car that doesn't punish stupid driving, why not drive a Camry? Haven't you ever heard "slow in fast out"?

I appreciate everything that is great about 911s, 914s, 968s, 928s, even Panameras.
Old 08-18-2011, 03:49 PM
  #38  
pnbell
Burning Brakes
 
pnbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ballston, VA
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Don't forget about the Increased Braking Ability of a Rear Engine design!

All that backend weight keeps the rear wheels planted during hard braking, and reduces forward weight transfer which tends to overload the front tires..

911s are able to brake way later than say competing Corvettes!
Old 08-18-2011, 05:51 PM
  #39  
Marajit
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Marajit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Borinquen
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Be that as it may, I found it strange that the dealer told me he couldn't handle a head gasket change on one of my 944s because, and I quote : "they never come out right".
Meanwhile, his generation X mechanic was looking under the hood and shaking his head...

It just seems to me that Porsche was forced to build the 944 or face certain ruin.

Besides their exceptional handling, that's one of the principal reason why I love the 944.
Old 08-18-2011, 09:06 PM
  #40  
eric951turbo
Burning Brakes
 
eric951turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Old 08-19-2011, 05:07 AM
  #41  
rgs944
Drifting
 
rgs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,334
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I do not think its a reflection of Porsche at all. When they quote those high prices for doing work that is there way of doing you a favor. They are basically saying with the value of the car that if you can not work on it yourself it is probably not worth owning. If you are filthy rich you can pay the prices they quote. Most current drivers of 944's are not filthy rich. In that case you just grab your wrenches and dig in, you'll thank them for it in the end.
Old 08-19-2011, 05:59 AM
  #42  
bad_monkey
Racer
 
bad_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It definitely pays to find out who deals with 944's in your area - even if they are far away. Then look at their credentials. I'm lucky to have motorscience.co.nz in the area - they build some pretty nice race cars as well as dealing with all the local "older" cars. To boot they are nice guys, and honest - they take pictures of their work as their going, and fully explain any work they do. Not precisely cheap - but not as expensive as the dealer. Can't win all ways...
Old 08-19-2011, 09:59 AM
  #43  
Cyberpunky
Three Wheelin'
 
Cyberpunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,519
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marajit
...It just seems to me that Porsche was forced to build the 944 or face certain ruin....
Porsche weren't forced to build the 944, it just happened to have been a huge success , and ended up saving their bacon

Maybe the good doctor can answer your question best

June 14, 1982

Dr. Porsche
invites you to test drive
the newest Porsche.

944

My family, beginning with my father, has been
designing and building cars for over 80 years.

At first, we worked for other companies.
"But always," my father said, "there were too many
compromises."

So we formed Porsche - to build Porsches. To our
family's own standards. Without compromise.

Our very first Porsche was the 356.
Now there is a new Porsche: the 944.
The 944 has a 2.5-liter, 4-cylinder, aluminum-silicon
alloy Porsche engine - designed at Weissach,
and built at Zuffenhausen.

It achieves a maximum torque of 137.1 ft-lbs as early
as 3000 rpm, and produces 143 hp at 5500 rpm.

On the track, the 944 accelerates from 0 to 50 mph
in 5.9 seconds. And it reaches the 1/4-mile mark from a
standing start in only 16.2 seconds at a speed of 84
mph. Its maximum speed: 130 mph.

The 944 has the Porsche transaxle design-proven at
Le Mans, and refined for everyday driving. It produces a
nearly-perfect 50-50 front-to-rear weight distribution
for balanced braking and improved cornering.

The 944's aerodynamic styling reduces air resistance
and improves road holding.

In fact, as a result of its total design efficiency, the 944
requires only 28 hp to cruise at 55 mph.

To my family, the 944 is more than a new car.
It is a new and true Porsche.


At Porsche, excellence is expected.

Dr. F. Porsche
Stuttgart
Old 08-19-2011, 10:17 AM
  #44  
Marajit
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Marajit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Borinquen
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you believe everything you read?
Old 08-19-2011, 10:42 AM
  #45  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,498
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

the 944 was a cash cow for porsche in the 80s. if they didnt like the model they wouldnt have developed S, S2, and turbo models of it. nor turbo cup or 968. it would have been a stopgap like the second 912.


Quick Reply: Would it be fair to say that Porsche hates the 944?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:21 PM.