StoogeMoe

I do! But once the number exceeds the fingers on my hands, I get confused.

I can't believe you actually figured that out. How many light years is that if that number was in miles?

Rogue_Ant

Well, in miles is still way to large..
Now if that number was attometers, and 1 attometer is 0.000000000000000001 meter. That is basically 1/1000th the size of a proton.
Then there is 9,460,730,472,580.8 kilometer in a light-year, which is 9,460,730,472,580,800,000,000,000,000,000,000 attometers.

So, our number in light years is still much too large to post. In fact even using units 1/1000th the size of a proton, our lightyear number is only negligibly smaller then the original. The original number was 79,999,996 digits long, and the lightyear number is 79,999,962 digits long...

luftpirate

Oooops sorry, I didn't mean you to go through all the extra work. Actually should have been :

(99999999 ^ 9999999 x 9999) + 1

So your'e saying writing that out by hand is not easier than turboing my N/A ?

Rogue_Ant

99999999^9999999*9999+1 == (99999999 ^ 9999999 x 9999) + 1



And yeah, writing that number is not easier then turboing an NA

StoogeMoe

See? That number is so big, that it is even larger than the known universe in size. So a ridiculous number. A bit of over-exaggeration by luftpirate.

JohnKoaWood

99999988000000210000000

http://www.alpertron.com.ar/BIGCALC.HTM

can handle to 1M digits...

Rogue_Ant

Yep, and 1M digits isn't enough for our number
As I mentioned, our number is ~80M digits...

onspeed

has anyone tried autozone bosch or duralast sets? lifetime warranty! i use to run duralasts in my camaro since they'd burn through wires at least twice a year... crap exhaust manifold design. however, only had to pay for wires once, and probably went through 4 or 5 sets.