Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3" exhaust on a 944s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2009, 02:36 PM
  #1  
Ecos
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Ecos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3" exhaust on a 944s?

I'm curious if any of you have went with 3" exhaust on an 944s and if so how did it run? I'm assuming it would be a bit large for this car and that the car would perform better with 2 1/2" (correct me if I'm wrong) but does it turn the car into a total dog or just not be quite as torquey?

I'm asking because my exhaust developed a nasty rattle that is driving me nuts and I want to do away with it. I plan on adding boost in the next few months so I don't really want to use a smaller size exhaust and then upgrade it again that soon.


Thanks in advance.
Old 02-18-2009, 02:47 PM
  #2  
smlporsche
Drifting
 
smlporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA & NC
Posts: 3,082
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I have a 3" exhaust on my S2 race car.
The dyno results (from this and other changes) shows it's producing quite a bit of power.
I don't know if a 2.5" would be better or not but the 3" works for me.
Old 02-18-2009, 03:01 PM
  #3  
krystar
Drifting
 
krystar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

if u do plan on having boost, then 3" is a definite.

but if u don't...it'll be kinda loud and a slight decrease in low end. but it's not going to be overly dramatic.
Old 02-18-2009, 03:31 PM
  #4  
Potomac-Greg
Drifting
 
Potomac-Greg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Suburban DC
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

These n/a engines seem to like back pressure. I had modified my exhaust to really open it up; and then to appease the wife, I bought a "stock" cat-back setup with a full muffler.

I put the quieter cat-back on and I was surprised at how much low end torque the car gained. I don't know what I'm giving up on the top end though.
Old 02-18-2009, 03:43 PM
  #5  
krystar
Drifting
 
krystar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i wonder how much valve overlap there is on the stock cam. has anyone ever specced it?
Old 02-18-2009, 05:26 PM
  #6  
halik
Three Wheelin'
 
halik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Potomac-Greg
These n/a engines seem to like back pressure. I had modified my exhaust to really open it up; and then to appease the wife, I bought a "stock" cat-back setup with a full muffler.

I put the quieter cat-back on and I was surprised at how much low end torque the car gained. I don't know what I'm giving up on the top end though.
Back pressure is a myth on FI cars, exhaust velocity is what matters
Old 02-18-2009, 05:28 PM
  #7  
Lorax
The Impaler
Rennlist Member
 
Lorax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by halik
Back pressure is a myth on FI cars, exhaust velocity is what matters
Uhhh what? You don't think back pressure is related to velocity?
Old 02-18-2009, 06:18 PM
  #8  
Funn944
Pro
 
Funn944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have an '86 N/A, overbored throttle body, adjustable fuel pressure regulator, MSDS headers, 3'" pipe all the way to the rear, Hi flow cat, magnaflow muffler. Maybe lost just a bit of lower end, but not really
noticable. Runs very well, Pulls stronr to rev limiter in MDS ignition, but it is pretty raspy, especially when under full acceleration !
Old 02-18-2009, 06:34 PM
  #9  
Reimu
Drifting
 
Reimu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NC Triad
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Do you lose a fair bit from the bottom end by dropping the cat?
Old 02-18-2009, 06:46 PM
  #10  
Ecos
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Ecos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Funn944
I have an '86 N/A, overbored throttle body, adjustable fuel pressure regulator, MSDS headers, 3'" pipe all the way to the rear, Hi flow cat, magnaflow muffler. Maybe lost just a bit of lower end, but not really
noticable. Runs very well, Pulls stronr to rev limiter in MDS ignition, but it is pretty raspy, especially when under full acceleration !

How does it sound at idle or cruising speed? I was thinking of going with a high flow cat (right now it has a straight pipe in place of cat) and Magnaflow muffler. I enjoy it noisy at WOT but *if* possible I would like to tone it down at idle and cruising speeds....kinda annoying to scream out your order at Taco Bell, or have the radio blaring just to hear it while going down the expressway. I had a Flowmaster on an old V8 that was ungodly at idle, I switched (to Borla I think) and it was much better...both had nice sound at WOT but the 2nd muffler was a lot better off throttle.

Thanks for the responses.

Also does anyone know offhand what angles the bends are in the exhaust? From pics it appears to be 2 45degree bends and 1 30degree at the front. I will be jacking the car up this weekend to check but thought I would ask just in case people have already found out they are some odd angles or some such.
Old 02-18-2009, 06:56 PM
  #11  
krystar
Drifting
 
krystar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

yea 2 45's and a 30 in front of the cat is right.

although if u did a tilt angle mount, u'd prob be ok with just one 45 or one 30
Old 02-18-2009, 08:08 PM
  #12  
Funn944
Pro
 
Funn944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

At idle, or cruising its not really too bad, although definitely louder than stock
Old 02-18-2009, 08:38 PM
  #13  
harrisonrick
Captain Obvious
Rennlist Member
 
harrisonrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Jesse (jgporsche) dyno'd his S and the results showed that a 2.5 inch exhaust on the 16V S engine was the largest for maximum benefit overall.


I recommend Russell Berry's 944S MAXHp chip too.
Old 02-18-2009, 09:43 PM
  #14  
halik
Three Wheelin'
 
halik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorax
Uhhh what? You don't think back pressure is related to velocity?
You don't want back pressure, that would move the spent fuel back into the cylinder when the piston is moving back down (while the valve is closing). You want change in pressure or exhaust velocity to be high to displace all the exhaust away from the motor and that's a function of the pipe diameter.


longer blurb
Old 02-18-2009, 09:47 PM
  #15  
roman944
Drifting
 
roman944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,684
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

how do you guys loose lower end (torque?) by going catless? I'd think straight pipe would be the best, no?


Quick Reply: 3" exhaust on a 944s?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:38 PM.