951 forged rods (crosspost)
#31
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I'm on Pet 5
Danno: 7K . . .man, I'm not even at 700
Yes, someone w/ cast rods, please post a pic. That's my problem - every engine I tear into has forged rods. . . kinda sucks.
Also, did the '83's have cross drilled rod journals on the cranks? Mine does, which was a pleasant surprise. If not, my "opinion" of this bottom end might be wrong. I think they still used the stock rods even if the crank was worked and bearings redone.
Danno: 7K . . .man, I'm not even at 700
Yes, someone w/ cast rods, please post a pic. That's my problem - every engine I tear into has forged rods. . . kinda sucks.
Also, did the '83's have cross drilled rod journals on the cranks? Mine does, which was a pleasant surprise. If not, my "opinion" of this bottom end might be wrong. I think they still used the stock rods even if the crank was worked and bearings redone.
#32
"Rumor" has it that there is a PET 6, April 2003 floating around now. I am guessing that it just updates newer models tho, and doesn't have any effect on us "older model" guys.
Back to th eforged rod thread, tho... aside from saving a little bit of weight, why do folks throw away perfectly good factory forged rods in favor of Pauter/Carillo? I am getting set to rebuild an engine and am wondering if I should upgrade or not.
Regards,
Back to th eforged rod thread, tho... aside from saving a little bit of weight, why do folks throw away perfectly good factory forged rods in favor of Pauter/Carillo? I am getting set to rebuild an engine and am wondering if I should upgrade or not.
Regards,
#33
Race Director
The Pauter rods are lighter than stock and the Carrillo are much, much stronger. Haven't heard of anyone actually being able to bend a stock rod. The primary stress on a rod is actually from its own weight due to RPMs, the forces from combustion and power is small compared to RPMs. The only rods I've known to have failed on the 951s have been due to rod-bearing problems. Which spins the bearing and destroys the crank-journal and the rod.
#34
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Matt, Scott.. I am on PET 5 as well, but I know there are version updates as well. Like PET 5.1, 5.51, 5.55551, etc. Pet 5 has been around since the mid 90's if I recall, and I am sure they would need to update it now and then.
#36
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And crank was cross drilled also.
#39
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#40
Rennlist Member
Funny I was just searching on this stuff a couple days ago.
If I were to rebuild an '86 NA motor, should I use the forged rods from my '83 NA? What will be the biggest difference?
If I were to rebuild an '86 NA motor, should I use the forged rods from my '83 NA? What will be the biggest difference?
#41
Pro
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Upstate, South Carolina
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The rotational mass of the engine rotating assembly will be heavier (and therefore, harder to spin). Not the ideal component for a NA rebuild. If you plan on unnaturally aspirating the car in the future it would be a good upgrade, but not necessary for a strictly NA car and will cost you some horsepower.
#43
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
How did that happen? Too much boost or sip of water?
#45
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Ouch.