Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

944 geneology: If the 924 was supposed to be a VW, and the 944 was...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2008, 01:06 AM
  #31  
944obscene
Three Wheelin'
 
944obscene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep. The Turbo Hydromatic transmissions were great designs. The TH350 is one of the most friendly/beatable transmissions you can swap on a car. And a Powerglide makes a great racing trans. There's a local race prepped 20b Miata SoloII car that runs a Powerglide trans with clutch engagement. That thing is a creepy crawly beast.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9W7reXDxpg
Old 02-20-2008, 10:16 AM
  #32  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 951_for_John
Porsche was paid to do the design and development on the 924 project, VW had a change in
management and the project was scrapped, Porsche bought the rights for less than VW/Audi had invested. and the rest is history....
Yep.
In the early 70's Porsche was contracted by VW to create a sports car for VW. As such the early 924 development used lots of VW & Audi parts to contrl both design and build costs. Along the way VW scrapped the sports car project idea and the EA425 as it was called had no home. At the time the 914 was reaching the end of is production life and Porsche needed a new entry level sports car. They were clearly familiar with the EA425 project as they have done all the design and development for VW. So they chose to buy back the design rigths from VW. Part of the deal was that the chassis be built at the VW plant in rather that the Porsche plant in Stuttgart. This had to do with capacity in Stuttgart and maintain some aspect of the 914 arrangement with VW. So by this time Porsche was in dire need of the entry level car as can be evidenced by the 1976 912E as a one year only entry level car that covered the gap between the 1975 914 and the 1977 924. So this meant alot of the 924 would be very similar to the EA425 as designed for VW. As time went on Porsche took the basic EA425 now turned 924 and made it more and more Porsche. The next big change was the 944's 2.5L Porsche motor vs 2.0L Audi motor. After this the 944 Turbo was developed and the VW rabbit based front suspension was ditched for aluminum Porsche parts. Same for the interior which was updated with more Porsche parts bin items and fewer VW parts bin items. These updates were also applied to the 85.5 944 non turbo cars. Interestingly the 924S was introduced as the latest entry level car using a mix of early and late 944 bits in the narrow body of the 924.
Old 02-20-2008, 11:06 AM
  #33  
Po924S
Three Wheelin'
 
Po924S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hum. I didn't know that GM did that. Cool.
Old 02-20-2008, 01:04 PM
  #34  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,589
Received 2,204 Likes on 1,243 Posts
Default

I grew up with Porsche's, Audi's and VW's the same way domestic fans will have a GMC truck, Pontiac sedan and a Corvette in the garage. To me they are all the same family, each serving a different market.

The snobbery of Porsche owners trying to distance themselves from their VW roots is amusing.
Old 02-20-2008, 01:54 PM
  #35  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,548
Received 648 Likes on 502 Posts
Default

so if the trans is just lifted out of the Audi 100, i wonder if it still has provisions for 4WD?
Old 02-20-2008, 02:01 PM
  #36  
J Silverman
Burning Brakes
 
J Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Burke, VA
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
so if the trans is just lifted out of the Audi 100, i wonder if it still has provisions for 4WD?
The transaxle is actually from an audi 5000.
Old 02-20-2008, 02:02 PM
  #37  
tifosiman
Race Director
 
tifosiman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Heart of it All
Posts: 12,208
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
so if the trans is just lifted out of the Audi 100, i wonder if it still has provisions for 4WD?
You should take yours apart to find out and get back to us on that.
Old 02-20-2008, 02:07 PM
  #38  
Potomac-Greg
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Potomac-Greg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Suburban DC
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J Silverman
The transaxle is actually from an audi 5000.
Yet it exhibits none of the Audi 5000s "sudden acceleration" tendencies.
Old 02-20-2008, 02:19 PM
  #39  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,548
Received 648 Likes on 502 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tifosiman
You should take yours apart to find out and get back to us on that.
when i get my tax return im hoping to buy a spare tranny to rebuild the first one, so ill get back to you then.
Old 02-20-2008, 03:24 PM
  #40  
944obscene
Three Wheelin'
 
944obscene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A FWD 944 would crawl on walls.
Old 02-20-2008, 05:03 PM
  #41  
951_for_John
Instructor
 
951_for_John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Coast CA.
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The drive shaft for the AWD will be at the rear of the trans. running to the rear bumper.
the flanges that the half shafts bolt to, go to the front wheels on the audi, then a drive shaft runs to a dif at the rear of the car...
Old 02-20-2008, 05:26 PM
  #42  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,548
Received 648 Likes on 502 Posts
Default

yes i know. but lamborghini, bugatti and our own 911 turbo have big driveshafts from the back of the car and dont seem to have any problems there :]

how freaking sweet would it be to have a 4wd 944 platform...
Old 02-20-2008, 06:36 PM
  #43  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default



that blue coolingfluid cap is from vw.

AHA 911 isn't a REAL porsche :>
Old 02-20-2008, 09:26 PM
  #44  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,548
Received 648 Likes on 502 Posts
Default

the glue on the headliner is the same brand honda uses


NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Old 02-28-2008, 10:51 AM
  #45  
whiz944
Burning Brakes
 
whiz944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,020
Received 424 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

M758 relates pretty much the whole story. Porsche didn't have the internal factory capacity to build the 924, and VW had just closed down the NSU plant in Nekarsulm - so they had some excess capacity. A deal was made, and the old NSU plant was used to build the 924. The arrangement worked well enough that the 944 was built there too. Though IIRC, the 944 engines were built over in the Porsche plant in Stuttgart and then trucked to Nekarsulm.

I traded in an Audi 5000S for my 944, back in 1987. Believe me when I tell you there is no comparison between the cars. I liked the Audi a lot, but the 944 was far and away a better car in every respect.


Quick Reply: 944 geneology: If the 924 was supposed to be a VW, and the 944 was...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:17 AM.