When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I would have to say the reason Porsche welded theirs to the strut tower was because they were still using the rubber strut mounts. If you have sphereical ones, it makes no difference
That still falls short of the bracing effect gained from the crossed bars the factory put in the 924 GTP:
My point was that the strut tower brace works best when additionally attached to the chassis in some way, and not just linking the strut towers together. Evidently, tying into a roll cage would gain the maximum effect.
I would have to say the reason Porsche welded theirs to the strut tower was because they were still using the rubber strut mounts. If you have sphereical ones, it makes no difference
I would have to say the reason Porsche welded theirs to the strut tower was because they were still using the rubber strut mounts. If you have sphereical ones, it makes no difference
I don't understand that statement. Could you go into more detail?
I do not think the strut brace in the picture is a racing dynamics brace. As far as I know the RD brace has four mounting points one one side and only two on the other side and the one pictured has 4 for each.
I have seen many of them break here on rennlist do a search and you shall find. They usually crack by the welds.
tifosiman has the one of best strut brace anyone can ever put on a 951 and thats the cup car brace which he has on there.
actually, thinking more about it, you can easily match the tensile strength of the Cup bar with an aftermarket bolt on one. Porsche probably welded theirs to the body because look at the design, easy to manufacture. Two simple brakets welded to the body, one bar easily bent with 4 bolt holes. Much easier than all the machining and welding required with all the aftermarket bars.