Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

944 na power upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2007, 09:50 AM
  #16  
tifosiman
Race Director
 
tifosiman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Heart of it All
Posts: 12,208
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jgporsche
I gained 10.9HP and 11TQ at the wheels with a Speedforce Racing exhaust. The exhaust was from the headers back. It was a full 2.5" stainless steel system. It has a high flow cat, bullet muffler and 4" tip. My opinion about exhausts on these cars, is that you DO need some kind of restriction in the system, too much free exhaust will inder your performance. This is why I have both the muffler and high flow cat.
With all due respect..........

That gain was on your 944S correct? If so it really can't be used as comparison to the 8V N/A.

I still would love to see a dyno sheet showing any gains with an SFR exhaust on an 8V N/A (before and after on an otherwise stock car would be the perfect comparison).
Old 01-29-2007, 11:04 AM
  #17  
UncleMaz
Nordschleife Master
 
UncleMaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,004
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheRealLefty
This a familiar, but always interesting discussion. Short of an old school bullet proof $30K-40K full race build with custom internals and massive upper end redesign (read JME SCCA motor) significant NA horsepower gains are hard to come by and very expensive when measured by "dollars per pony."

Lacking the proven combination of engine management and WG mods that can instantly ramp up a healthy 2.5 Turbo by 50-100 HP, gains with NA's are measured in 2-3 HP improvements.

I have a JME Stage One cam, cone filter, throttle cam, fresh Turbo valve springs, adjustable FPR and a custom low restriction header-back exhaust with only a Flowmaster 40 muffler and I don't think I've gained 10 HP over stock, if that.

FWIW, scuttlebutt suggests that a Jere Stahl header is just about the only NA bolt-on that makes a big difference, but like the JME cam it's a $700+ hit for a couple of ponies. Word is that the real deal killer in all of this is not intake or exhaust breathing but rather the head itself. The valves are big, they move a long distance and there's a lot of flow disturbance in their wake and therein lies the rub, apparently.

As advised above, best advice for NA performance is to take out weight, keep up your momentum and enjoy one of the best handling cars ever produced.
Thanks for keeping it positive.
Old 01-29-2007, 11:35 AM
  #18  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by upcruiser
exhaust- Are there any header setups that you guys have good experience with?
Headers.... Stahl headers are the best. Cost is about $650 for the set. Then run with test pipe (no cat). Gain is maybe 5-8 hp over stock headers & test pipe. Then get a Borla XR-1 muffler to ensure max gains.

Now you will also want to have chip custom tuned for the exhaust. Cost will be quite high, but you might be able to break 140 at the wheels if you do all this on fresh engine with top end rebuild.

This is from experince in the 944 spec world. By contrast stock headers & chip will get you 134-135 whp with fresh stock head. I figure 131-133 with stock chip and stock headers.


Intake the best is stock if you stay with Barn door AFM. You could also add in an adjustable Fuel Pressure regulator and maybe see north fo 140 at the wheels. However you will need to dyno time and lots of it to see the gains. Just bolting the parts on you won't see much, but bolt them on then tune the crap out if it maybe 145 rwhp. I'd figure about 1.5 to 2k for parts and dyno time.


BTW... this why 944 spec just went to stock headers only and stock chips. We always had stock Fuel pressure regulators, stock AFM's, and stock cams.
Old 01-29-2007, 11:37 AM
  #19  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by knfeparty
The 2.7 is nothing to write home about. Doesn't it, according to Clark's documentation, only have 4 more hp and identical torque?

In practice the 2.7l has only a bit more hp, but 10ft-lbs of torque across the rev band so it will be a faster track car than 2.5L car. However you would only notice in a side by side drag race.
Old 01-29-2007, 11:42 AM
  #20  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jgporsche
I gained 10.9HP and 11TQ at the wheels with a Speedforce Racing exhaust. The exhaust was from the headers back. It was a full 2.5" stainless steel system. It has a high flow cat, bullet muffler and 4" tip. My opinion about exhausts on these cars, is that you DO need some kind of restriction in the system, too much free exhaust will inder your performance. This is why I have both the muffler and high flow cat.
I believe I gained 10hp from removing the stock cat on my 944 race car. I kept the 2.25 dia pipe and a stock muffler. This seems to be supported by dyno results from other 944 spec racers. Not sure how much was a result of and old clogged up cat vs not having it at all. Still I advice a test pipe for any 944 track car.
Old 01-29-2007, 11:43 AM
  #21  
upcruiser
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
upcruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Marquette, MI
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M758
Headers.... Stahl headers are the best. Cost is about $650 for the set. Then run with test pipe (no cat). Gain is maybe 5-8 hp. Then get a Borla XR-1 muffler.

Now you will also want to have chip custom tuned for the exhaust. Cost will be quite high, but you might be able to break 140 at the wheels if you do all this on fresh engine with top end rebuild.

This is from experince in the 944 spec world. By contrast stock headers & chip will get you 134-135 whp with fresh stock head. I figure 131-133 with stock chip and stock headers.


Intake the best is stock if you stay with Barn door AFM. You could also add in an adjustable Fuel Pressure regulator and maybe see north fo 140 at the wheels. However you will need to dyno time and lots of it to see the gains. Just bolting the parts on you won't see much, but bolt them on then tune the crap out if it maybe 145 rwhp. I'd figure about 1.5 to 2k for parts and dyno time.


BTW... this why 944 spec just went to stock headers only and stock chips. We always had stock Fuel pressure regulators, stock AFM's, and stock cams.
Thanks Joe. Do you have a link to Spec 944 specs? Not that I'm setting up my car for it right now, but would like to keep any upgrades I do inline with what can be run in it. I dream of being able to run in that series, but it would be a ways down the road still. This way I avoid doing anything expensive that might be throw away money down the road. Just trying to keep my options open.
Old 01-29-2007, 11:48 AM
  #22  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by upcruiser
Thanks Joe. Do you have a link to Spec 944 specs? Not that I'm setting up my car for it right now, but would like to keep any upgrades I do inline with what can be run in it. I dream of being able to run in that series, but it would be a ways down the road still. This way I avoid doing anything expensive that might be throw away money down the road. Just trying to keep my options open.
Rules are here
http://www.nasaproracing.com/rules/944challenge.pdf

Read the 944 Spec section of the rules. 944 cup is high prep level and potentialy alot more costly.

please note that we just got more restrictive on header and chip rules (now must be stock) Reason was due to the Stahl header and folks spend hours on the dyno looking for 3-5 hp and trying to fatten their mid range power curves. Result were cars that were a marginally faster at an exponetial cost. So the rules now requrire stock headers and stock chips. No need to spend 2k in parts and dyno time trying to keep up.
Old 01-29-2007, 04:53 PM
  #23  
upcruiser
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
upcruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Marquette, MI
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the link, I'll have to look it over tonight. I like the logic behind the rule change you mention. That kind of thinking really makes that series appealing to me, a guy of modest means.



Quick Reply: 944 na power upgrades



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:11 PM.