Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Timing chain instead of a belt. Would it be possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2007, 02:27 PM
  #31  
greenshoes3
Pro
 
greenshoes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MPD47


Do a search, I think we've been over this about 10 times.
lollll
Old 06-28-2007, 02:29 PM
  #32  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 117 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

REPOST REPOST REPOST!!!!

It would cost MORE than the car is worth to convert it to a chain.
Old 06-28-2007, 03:03 PM
  #33  
alordofchaos
Rennlist Member
 
alordofchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 34,276
Received 165 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
It would cost MORE than the car is worth to convert it to a chain.
It would cost MORE than the car is worth to convert it to... just about anything

Old 06-28-2007, 10:14 PM
  #34  
gtroth
Rennlist Member
 
gtroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Timing chain? That's silly.
Attached Images  
Old 06-28-2007, 10:31 PM
  #35  
Legoland951
Race Car
 
Legoland951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 4,032
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Now lets see how hard it would be to convert that to a timing belt.
Old 06-29-2007, 02:53 AM
  #36  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,540
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gtroth
Timing chain? That's silly.
That looks like a 911...
Old 06-29-2007, 02:54 AM
  #37  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,540
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MichelleJD
Forgot to add:
They cured the water pump issue by mounting it on the backside (actually, left side as the engine is transverse mounted) and running it off of the camshaft.
From what I've seen, the 4.2 V8 only goes in back to front. IE S4, A6, etc.
Old 06-29-2007, 04:06 PM
  #38  
Naplesguy06
Racer
 
Naplesguy06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your in de clairdeair- get off the crack.
Old 06-29-2007, 04:53 PM
  #39  
MyBlackCar
Pro
 
MyBlackCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jfrahm
Does this mean if someone did a swap using this engine that it would still be "Porsche"?
Old 06-29-2007, 05:04 PM
  #40  
teamking
Pro
 
teamking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gt37vgt
the increased enertia of the chain is a horror show i've never seen a chain that long when you lift your foot of the gas often the cam wont want to slow as quick as the crank and the enertia of the chain is a real issue in it self destructing why ferrari whet single row chain over double . use your time and effort getting generous valve reliefs in the pistons so its no problem breaking the belt and get a gates belt heaps better than the conticrap oem
Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
+1. The chain would kill throttle response.
The S2000 has a timing chain.
9300 RPM.
Never needs replacement.
Very good throttle response.
Runs a much more sophisticated valve train.

Only downside: it's louder.

Now, as to swapping-- that's a different story. If you must have a timing chain it would be easiest to get a different car. I would bet that it would also be easier to swap in an engine (such as an F20C) then to try to cobble together a timing chain onto an engine built for a belt.
Old 06-29-2007, 05:22 PM
  #41  
Jfrahm
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jfrahm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 6,501
Likes: 0
Received 126 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MyBlackCar
Does this mean if someone did a swap using this engine that it would still be "Porsche"?
Swap a transverse V-6 into a 944 to get a whopping 200-230HP?
Be my guest.
Old 06-29-2007, 05:53 PM
  #42  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,540
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by teamking
The S2000 has a timing chain.
9300 RPM.
Never needs replacement.
Very good throttle response.
Runs a much more sophisticated valve train.

Only downside: it's louder.

Now, as to swapping-- that's a different story. If you must have a timing chain it would be easiest to get a different car. I would bet that it would also be easier to swap in an engine (such as an F20C) then to try to cobble together a timing chain onto an engine built for a belt.
It's also an engine designed for a timing chain, and the chain itself probably is designed to be light. And the motor makes 90 more HP than the NA motor, which gives it the needed oomph to make that metal fly around 9300 times a minute.
Old 06-29-2007, 05:53 PM
  #43  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,540
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MyBlackCar
Does this mean if someone did a swap using this engine that it would still be "Porsche"?
I suppose so, but if you want a V-6 you may as well go for the Cayenne motor or swap in a VQ35DE out of a Nissan Z.
Old 06-29-2007, 06:02 PM
  #44  
teamking
Pro
 
teamking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
It's also an engine designed for a timing chain, and the chain itself probably is designed to be light.
yes and probably.


Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
And the motor makes 90 more HP than the NA motor, which gives it the needed oomph to make that metal fly around 9300 times a minute.
If there were any more 'oomph' required to turn the chain, one could lighten the flywheel.



I was only trying to make the point that timing chains are superior in most regards to belts, except for NVH. I haven't the foggiest notion of what your point was.
Old 06-29-2007, 07:01 PM
  #45  
eman930
Banned
 
eman930's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 1,919
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I dont think A chain would be that bad at all, Alot of the newToyota/lexus and others are all going chain. Its really not as bad as you al think it is. It would not suck that much power down to be that noticable.

Here is a idea, WHy not just not run a belt or a chain, Get a electric waterpump and some electric sylinoids to run the valves ;-) I know crazy, But it is the new technology that will soon be here


Quick Reply: Timing chain instead of a belt. Would it be possible?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:30 PM.