Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Running w/o balance shaft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2006, 02:36 PM
  #16  
josephsc
Race Car
 
josephsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Albany, CA: celebrating 100 years of independence from Berkeley, CA
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

For what it's worth, this is from a book: Cotton, M., "Porsche 924, 944 & 968", pg 58 -- but not sure of the original source:
The twin, contra-rotating balancer shafts were the key smooth performance, <snip>. Tests showed that the balancer shaft system absorbed three or four horsepower at maximum engine speed, an entirely acceptable figure for an engine so efficient otherwise.
Old 09-17-2006, 04:42 PM
  #17  
Trucho-951
Pro
 
Trucho-951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Napa Valley, CA
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I believe John Milledge Engineering has built motors with b/s delete. However, I think the rotating assembly has been balanced for that type of use.

Here's a pic.

No B/S Engine

pun intented...
Old 09-17-2006, 10:51 PM
  #18  
Stan944
Burning Brakes
 
Stan944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Canada, Vancouver area
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I kept the balance shaft off for a few minutes once (while troubleshooting a problem). It worked, but there were noticable vibrations around 2.5 - 2.7 krpm. For daily driving it certainly would be annoying. For racing it could be OK, but I don't know if the engine would fail prematurely?
Old 09-17-2006, 10:58 PM
  #19  
David Floyd
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
David Floyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,109
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stan944
I kept the balance shaft off for a few minutes once (while troubleshooting a problem). It worked, but there were noticable vibrations around 2.5 - 2.7 krpm. For daily driving it certainly would be annoying. For racing it could be OK, but I don't know if the engine would fail prematurely?
A true balance shaft delete removes the shafts not just the belt, if done right the car is very smooth.
Old 09-18-2006, 12:55 AM
  #20  
luckett
Three Wheelin'
 
luckett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA Porsche: '92 968 Blk/Cashmere
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When removing the balance shafts do you just plug the oil holes or does something else need to be done?
Old 09-18-2006, 01:26 AM
  #21  
Calmchaos
Rennlist Member
 
Calmchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Burlington. NJ
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I ran without a belt for a while, because my BS belt got shredded. My thrust washers snapped and the belt just got sliced up inside that cover... lucky as hell it didnt jam the Tbelt.
Anyway...
I ran w/o it for a few days maybe it added 2hp but I would never notice that. But when I put the belt back on (after replacing the bad tensioner) it became SO much smoother.
It was weird because I didn't notice the difference when I didnt have it, but I noticed when I put it back on. And like rock... I also had a tensioner bolt fall out of my PS pump.
Old 09-18-2006, 01:46 AM
  #22  
Campeck
Campeck Rulez
Rennlist Member

 
Campeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Calmchaos
lucky as hell it didnt jam the Tbelt.
.
cough no belt covers COUGH!!!
Old 09-18-2006, 09:36 AM
  #23  
924RACR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
924RACR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 3,988
Received 80 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Use Loctite or you'll lose your nuts.

Though I don't race a 2.5L car, I'd feel comfortable removing the shafts and belt on a race-prepped motor, since I'd balance the whole rotating assembly before I worried about removing the shafts. That said, I'd also likely run in a class (ITS) where it would probably be illegal...
Old 09-18-2006, 09:57 AM
  #24  
sweanders
Race Director
 
sweanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The only bad thing I have seen regarding to this matter is that the oil pickup cracked and fell off..
Old 09-18-2006, 10:34 AM
  #25  
ApexCars
Pro
 
ApexCars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don Istook will do a BS deletes. According to him, if done right, you won't be able to tell a difference in the vibration. There is more to it than removing the belts though. Balance shafts are put in by manufacturers because it is cheaper and quicker than balancing every engine.
Old 09-18-2006, 11:17 AM
  #26  
Team SSR
Instructor
 
Team SSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've seen the oil pump pickup crack and very nearly fall off a race motor with B/S. The "Balance shafts" do not affect the internal balance of the engine. Pistons, rings, wristpins, rods, etc.. do, but since it is a flat crankshaft they counteract each other. The biggest effect on balance is the flywheel and clutch assembly. Most shops will balance the crankshaft by itself and then spin it again with the flywheel, or possibly 0 balance the flywheel by itself. Whether you run the balance shafts or not, the engine generates the same "out of balance" forces...the balance shafts create a secondary force to counteract the primary forces.
I'm not sure about PCA, but SCCA IT classes don't allow for removal of the balance shafts which may be why no racers are chiming in on why they do/don't run them.
Also, when removing accessories to gain HP... remember, you can't gain more HP than they cost. You can calculate the HP required to generate the amps your alternator is putting out. Which means if it only takes 3hp to spin your alternator under full load, you can't gain 5hp by removing it. The same for balanceshafts, water pumps, etc.
Old 09-18-2006, 11:25 AM
  #27  
Ken D
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Ken D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,056
Received 79 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Some good advice here. You should also talk to Scott Gomes; see this thread.
Balance Shaft Delete thread
Old 09-18-2006, 12:01 PM
  #28  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Serge944
If he thinks he can gain 15hp from no balance shafts, he is severely mistaken. There is no load on the balance shafts. Sure, it's extra mass that your motor has to turn, but the moment of a balance shaft isn't very large. The added vibration isn't worth the fraction of a hp which you may gain, in my opinion. It will cause hardware you didn't even know existed to loosen and some parts to wear prematurely.

Perfectly said!

Do NOT delete the shafts!

Things that see extra vibes from deleted shafts.

1) Oil pickup tube - if it breaks you have spun the #2 bearing = Bad news
2) fuel rails - crack where the fuel damper and regulator are = fuel leak and possible fire

These are two for SURE... there are also all kinds of other brakets that crack.

BTW.. this NOT LEGAL for 944 cup.

All 3 avaible prep level PCA, SCCA ITS, and 944 spec requried the shafts so just keep them on.

The only way I would delete the shafts is if I knife edged the crank. I that case the actuall counter balance weight would be not correct given the slightly light engine mass. Remember these things work by creating a counter balanceing vibration to cancel out the effect of the secondary harmonics in the engine. That is why most folks don't really "feel them" very much but there are there in a very indirect way. The 4 cylinder engine is natrually unbalacned and with small internals (ie 1.6, 1.8, 2.0L) engines these secondard harmnics are small. In the larger engines like our 2.5L unit the extra mass of pistons and crank beging to cause extra vibes. So while it would be nice to pul the shafts expect to see things breaking since there will be more vib energy in certain frequencies than before. When designed and developed Porsche test with the shafts and all the bracketry was designed given those conditions. Once you change the vib signatiure of the engine otherwise solid parts can being failing at alarming rates.

Not worth the 1-2 hp you get to risk all kinds of stuff breaking thus not allowing you run events.
Old 09-18-2006, 01:14 PM
  #29  
Serge944
Rennlist Member
 
Serge944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: California
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 0
Received 55 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Remember Tony Garcia's insane 951 2.8? It had balance shaft delete and it wasn't that smooth. That car had some serious money/knowledge put into it, too. I've seen it in person.

It's illogical for someone trying to gain some "vanity hp." Especially on a 944.
Old 09-18-2006, 02:07 PM
  #30  
evil 944t
Rennlist Member
 
evil 944t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Serge944
If he thinks he can gain 15hp from no balance shafts, he is severely mistaken. There is no load on the balance shafts.
I can speak from experience. I know someone who cut the belt while on an engine dyno and gained 7hp.

Keep in mind that it is a race only motor and is taking a part and inspected, often.

The motor has a lot of time and money invested and makes a lot of hp.


Quick Reply: Running w/o balance shaft



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:55 PM.