Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is the 924 Turbo a maintenance headache?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2006, 06:08 PM
  #1  
austin944
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
austin944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,078
Received 32 Likes on 20 Posts
Default Is the 924 Turbo a maintenance headache?

I'm looking at a 1980 924 Turbo that's for sale in Dallas. I don't know much about these cars and I was wondering if they are a maintenance headache like what I've been told by certain people.

I know that a lot of times, the conventional wisdom about a car is flat out wrong or wildly exaggerated, and maybe that's the case with the 924 Turbo. I have a Maserati Biturbo and that car is very maintenance intensive but I can still handle it since I dont' put that many miles on it, and it's a backup car.

So what's the scoop from people who actually know a lot about these cars? Are they reasonably reliable if maintained properly, or will it be an ongoing hassle?

edit: asking price on the 1980 924 Turbo is $2600.

Last edited by austin944; 05-16-2006 at 06:49 PM.
Old 05-16-2006, 06:44 PM
  #2  
Sasquatch
Instructor
 
Sasquatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fuel distributors are NLA, turbos have a very short lifespan, other parts NLA. The NA 924 is as close to bulletproof as you can make a car, but the turbo is more troublesome.
Old 05-16-2006, 08:09 PM
  #3  
Swagger93
Burning Brakes
 
Swagger93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Your mom
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yeah man, i think it has K-Jetronic...ew. I'd say it's a car you could probably make more reliable with application of modern systems...such as the turbo, which I believe is oil cooled, and I don't know if it has a blow off valve, which would surge the sh*t out of the compressor wheel (the Mitsu Starion and Chrysler Conquest didn't!).

Just remember, mechanical fuel injection is alright when it's working and horrible when it's not. I had a 1980 Saab 99 GLi with K-Jetronic, and it took hours of cleaning, moving set screws, and other adjustments to get it to even idle on all four cylinders...and it was a clean, 80k mile car.

Hey, and it's the van engine!!!

Last edited by Swagger93; 05-17-2006 at 12:46 PM.
Old 05-16-2006, 11:56 PM
  #4  
PaulStewart
Rennlist Member
 
PaulStewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,435
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I've owned a 1980 924 Turbo since 1993. It is no worse than my 1987 924S. Parts are cheaper than ones for my 01 986.

Like most Porsches, these cars love to be beat, baby them, let them sit, or ignore factory recommended maintenance schedules, they will punish your wallet severely.

More info can be found at:

www.924board.org
Old 05-17-2006, 12:05 AM
  #5  
MM951
Race Director
 
MM951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hudson Valley
Posts: 10,605
Received 49 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

like swagger said , if you pick it up get a bypass valve.....the turkey gobble is f'in annoying and will put the hurt on your turbo..

1st buy on my conquest was a bov because even at 7psi the gobble was loud
Old 05-17-2006, 12:09 AM
  #6  
PaulStewart
Rennlist Member
 
PaulStewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,435
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

The car came from the factory with one installed in the turbo housing.
Old 05-17-2006, 03:10 AM
  #7  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Swagger93

Hey, and it's the van engine!!!
You're probably forgetting the fact that this van engine has very much potential and the most powerful of the 924/944/968 line-up cars was actually with that van engine: 924 Carrera GTR (375hp).
Old 05-17-2006, 06:12 AM
  #8  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Wow. That's a boatload of power from a dinky vw engine. But if you do the same kind of race improvements and upgrades to the 968 engine, you can get a lot more than 375hp.
Old 05-17-2006, 06:55 AM
  #9  
Royal Tiger
Drifting
 
Royal Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 968 is also a 3.0L and much more modern in design, so I would hope it would outpower the 931. If you like the car and can afford the upgrades to make it easier to work on and more reliable, I say go for it.
Old 05-17-2006, 09:33 AM
  #10  
924RACR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
924RACR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 3,980
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

They're not a maintenance headache IMO - once you get them properly restored. My '82 is my daily driver in the summer, and I love it - hard to give up the keys to my wife. Unfortunately, it seems, the (plat) silver color of mine is a liability; it was hit while parked for the 4th time yesterday, while I was out of town. Argh.

Anywho, back on topic... you can spend a lot of time, even more than money really, debugging all the stuff from neglect. Electrical, boost leaks, worn turbos (life should be far better with synthetic oil and proper cool-down procedures), that kind of stuff. I also don't find mine as refined as the later cars; have an '87 924S now, it really is a step forward, and I think ultimately I'll likely sell the 82 and the 87 and step up to an S2. Of course, I'm still keeping my '81 931 as an ultimate street monster! Aiming for 250+ hp and 2400lbs...
Old 05-17-2006, 12:57 PM
  #11  
testarossa_td
Race Car
 
testarossa_td's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Spend that towards a 944
Just keep looking.
Old 05-17-2006, 01:02 PM
  #12  
924RACR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
924RACR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 3,980
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Took another look, realized you're talking about an '80... at least, keep looking for an 81-82 - 944 brakes, better engine controls, transmission, etc...
Old 05-17-2006, 01:09 PM
  #13  
Swagger93
Burning Brakes
 
Swagger93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Your mom
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raceboy
You're probably forgetting the fact that this van engine has very much potential and the most powerful of the 924/944/968 line-up cars was actually with that van engine: 924 Carrera GTR (375hp).
Hey, I didn't say it anything about it; I just said it's the van engine It's straight from Jeremy Clarkson.

And I don't think the van engine is exactly the cheapest to modify.
Old 05-17-2006, 02:55 PM
  #14  
924RACR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
924RACR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 3,980
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Yeah, it's the bread-van motor, no question about it. Other than the head, it's actually not that bad to mod, since it's nothing exotic... but the head limits breathing so much... that it's perfect for forced-induction!
Old 05-17-2006, 09:57 PM
  #15  
Tony K
Burning Brakes
 
Tony K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toledo and Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Slightly OT: Didn't one of the very last racing versions of the 924 have a prototype of the 2.5 liter 944 engine? Raced at LeMans?


Quick Reply: Is the 924 Turbo a maintenance headache?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:33 AM.