Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is the 924 Turbo a maintenance headache?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2006 | 10:17 PM
  #16  
Charlie944's Avatar
Charlie944
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 1
From: Oconomowoc, WI
Default

Yep it sure did, and it was a prototype 16v DOHC 2.5L turbocharged version of the 944. Raced in 1981 at LeMans.

I would hold out for the later 81-82 year variants as well. Those 2.0L engines are tough but I would speculate that with the iron block and Aluminum head that a steel head gasket would be ideal. That is what the MKIII Supra boys have to do. Also the clyinder spacing is minute in between bores. The 931's used a 911 Turbo wastegate so those parts can get prciey, and the turbo uses a internal pop-off valve. Fun cars my friend has two 81's, one of which is going under some serious mods.
Attached Images   
Old 05-17-2006 | 11:12 PM
  #17  
PaulStewart's Avatar
PaulStewart
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 13
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by Raceboy
You're probably forgetting the fact that this van engine has very much potential and the most powerful of the 924/944/968 line-up cars was actually with that van engine: 924 Carrera GTR (375hp).
This one?

Old 05-18-2006 | 08:24 AM
  #18  
Charlie944's Avatar
Charlie944
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 1
From: Oconomowoc, WI
Default

Yep that be the one
Here are some pics with the massive intercooler incorporated.
Attached Images    
Old 05-18-2006 | 09:33 AM
  #19  
Raceboy's Avatar
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 17
From: Estonia
Default

I should take pics of my 931 engine. Oh, I have taken pics of it, just not when I installed it in the engine compartment :
It sure has bigger huffer than the mighty gtr The amount of power remains to be seen (after completion of stand-alone ems)
Actually modifying the 2.0 is very cheap if you know what to do and stock crank+rods (not to talk about the block, it's made for a tank I presume) are very strong.
Old 05-18-2006 | 10:25 AM
  #20  
Sasquatch's Avatar
Sasquatch
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Boise, Idaho
Default

My 82 924 went over 300k before finally spinning a rod bearing. (sold it to a friend just before this happened). When we rebuilt the motor, the cylinder bores showed no wear. I mean absolutely no wear. The pistons had so little wear that I still dont think the machine shop believes us when we told him it had 300k+ on it. All he had to do is very lightly kiss the cylinders with a hone to break the glaze.

That was about 5 years ago. My friend just recently sold the car and has but put another 100k+ on it while in his possesion. I had converted it to side draft webers when I owned it and it still has that setup.



Quick Reply: Is the 924 Turbo a maintenance headache?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:38 PM.