Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Optimum Muffler for Backpressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2006, 09:18 PM
  #16  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes, Magnaflow! Thank you!

I also have heard really good things about Remus, but they are rather pricey.
Old 05-10-2006, 09:20 PM
  #17  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Magnaflow is a good exhaust. If he is running a cat, he will not lose much low end power. I remember running a striaght through type resonator as a muffler with the factory catalytic. There was no change in low end power from what it felt like, high end I never really bothered to determine because I was wrapped up in the sound
Old 05-10-2006, 11:11 PM
  #18  
Campeck
Campeck Rulez
Rennlist Member

 
Campeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bleucamaro
I'm planning on getting a Spintech to replace the Borla thats currently on the S2. The car has a cat still, so I'm not worried about a lack of backpressure.
did you even read.
backpressure is bad. omg.
Old 05-10-2006, 11:28 PM
  #19  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

You don't know that. Backpressure in same cases may even help combustion and compression. I won't go into detail on it because I haven't studied it much. I do know that any exhaust straight through that is larger than 2 1/4" diameter significantly affects respiration on the 8-valve cars, causing a loss of torque with little to no gain in the upper RPMs. And yes, I do have dyno time to prove this.
Old 05-11-2006, 02:40 AM
  #20  
GOSANE
Banned
 
GOSANE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: T-T-T-TIMMAHHHH!!
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

borla=glasspack (more mellow sound)
magnaflow= baffled and or chambered (more raspy sound)

any turbo benifits from as little backpressure as possible (how much noise can you get by with?)
Old 05-11-2006, 03:09 AM
  #21  
bleucamaro
Drifting
 
bleucamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Elk Gove, CA
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Campeck
did you even read.
backpressure is bad. omg.
Next time, I'll have to put more emPHAsis on the sarCASm.
Old 05-11-2006, 03:19 AM
  #22  
formerGMguy
Racer
 
formerGMguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GOSANE
borla=glasspack (more mellow sound)
magnaflow= baffled and or chambered (more raspy sound)

any turbo benifits from as little backpressure as possible (how much noise can you get by with?)
Magnaflows aren't baffled or chambered. Unless they've changed design recently every Magnaflow I've bought has had a perforated tube running through it with a fiberglass packing.
Old 05-11-2006, 07:49 AM
  #23  
Campeck
Campeck Rulez
Rennlist Member

 
Campeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TheStig
Magnaflow is a good exhaust. If he is running a cat, he will not lose much low end power. I remember running a striaght through type resonator as a muffler with the factory catalytic. There was no change in low end power from what it felt like, high end I never really bothered to determine because I was wrapped up in the sound
ok. i can see how it would affect compression. maybe make it .1 point higher or something. but the point is that any exhaust left in the chamber is going to slow down cumbustion, heat the air, and lose power. yes i do know. ive posted sheets of dyno testing before and you can't tell me that inlet charge dillution is going to help power...
Old 05-11-2006, 07:50 AM
  #24  
Campeck
Campeck Rulez
Rennlist Member

 
Campeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bleucamaro
Next time, I'll have to put more emPHAsis on the sarCASm.
oh KAY
Old 05-11-2006, 08:43 AM
  #25  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TheStig
You don't know that. Backpressure in same cases may even help combustion and compression. I won't go into detail on it because I haven't studied it much. I do know that any exhaust straight through that is larger than 2 1/4" diameter significantly affects respiration on the 8-valve cars, causing a loss of torque with little to no gain in the upper RPMs. And yes, I do have dyno time to prove this.
Stig, if you're talking to me, I can tell you that my info comes from someone who is an OEM engineer and used to work on the Toyota GTP engine program.
Old 05-11-2006, 08:47 AM
  #26  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Campeck
ok. i can see how it would affect compression. maybe make it .1 point higher or something. but the point is that any exhaust left in the chamber is going to slow down cumbustion, heat the air, and lose power. yes i do know. ive posted sheets of dyno testing before and you can't tell me that inlet charge dillution is going to help power...
Actually, it won't raise CR at all. CR is a static measure. There is no such thing as "dynamic compression ratio" despite the Internet gurus who claim otherwise. Consult an automotive engineering textbook and you won't find that expression used.
Old 05-11-2006, 10:38 AM
  #27  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geo
Stig, if you're talking to me, I can tell you that my info comes from someone who is an OEM engineer and used to work on the Toyota GTP engine program.
sorry Geo, I was talking to campeck.

Campeck, The design and engineering put into the 944 motor can only be improved upon through mechanical modification. If one is looking to gain more power out of an exhaust system for the 8-valve car, it's not going to happen there. When Porsche created the exhaust system for the 944, the header was equally matched and lengthened. The factory muffler really doesn't cause a restriction issue and I have seen cars put more HP to the rear wheels using the factory muffler when compared to other exhausts out there.

Now again, I'm not a pro at exactly telling you how backpressure can affect the 8-valve naturally aspirated, but there is some needed in the 944 to help pressurize the cylinders for proper combustion. That .1 point that you said it may add in compression is a tenth of a point. That is a difference in compression that could increase power as well. If you look at the cylinder head on the 944, you'll find that the exhaust ports and intake ports are matched to the diameter of the valves, proving there is little to no restriction relevant to the entrance and exit of exhaust and oxygen that feeds the engine.

Another thing to do in this debate is to ask someone with a 3" exhaust on a 944 all the way back that is straight through how the car feels. And, I'm quite sure he will tell you the same thing I'm getting at: loss of low end, small amount of gain in the high end. The 944 motor cannot make full use of a straight through design because the engine is not designed for high RPM, nor is the camshaft profile appropriate. But, then again, what do I know? I've only rebuilt a frickin' motor, and have constructed over 4 different exhaust systems already for 2 944s.... Don't mind me.
Old 05-11-2006, 10:58 AM
  #28  
bart1
Race Car
 
bart1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Speaking strictly of muffler durability, Flowmasters are much more durable than Borlas. My stainless Borla rotted out around the pipe on my Jeep. Not impressed.
Old 05-11-2006, 12:11 PM
  #29  
White Pony
Racer
 
White Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scales Bump, IlliNOIZE
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.car-stuff.com/performance...5&skipped=true

LAWL chec out this muffler that came up for my '24....

Sounds like my ex girlfriend.
Old 05-11-2006, 12:51 PM
  #30  
Travis - sflraver
Site Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Travis - sflraver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A great big building in the woods, FL.
Posts: 6,527
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I am using a supertrapp to tune in my "HP robbing" backpressure. It doesn't give you any more/less HP/Tq but it does move it around. I went with a more restrictive system to give me more power down low on my 86na autox car.
I am not going to join in the technical discussion about backpressure on the NA but it works very well for me and my application.


Quick Reply: Optimum Muffler for Backpressure



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:38 AM.