Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone here ever been up against an Audi tt quatro on the track?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2006, 03:31 AM
  #16  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I've never had any 4wd or awd cars, but I'm sure I'd be best off in an audi if I were driving through mud or snow. However, I'd rather take my bro's front wheel drive VW to the track than the TT - it understeers, but it would at least be more entertaining to toss it around than how the TT looked with Tiff driving it.
Old 04-06-2006, 04:58 PM
  #17  
BlueDog944
Pro
 
BlueDog944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lovettsville, VA
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chris luckett
While looking for info on the 350Z, I came across this video. Check out how badly the TT pushes on the track.

http://www.autospies.com/article/ind...articleId=6889
FWIW, all new cars are designed to push. Learned this from several chief instructors and read it somewhere. Seems designers feel that its safer than a car that would tend to step out in the rear.
Old 04-06-2006, 07:19 PM
  #18  
959Lover
Racer
 
959Lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FRporscheman
However, I'd rather take my bro's front wheel drive VW to the track than the TT - it understeers, but it would at least be more entertaining to toss it around than how the TT looked with Tiff driving it.
Get away from my Volkswagen
__________________
Ashkan, 18

'95 968 6-speed coupe - Bro's
'85.1 944 - Bro's (prepping for paint, and converting interior to black!)
'84 944 - Mom's
'83 928S - Dad's

My ride: '85 VW GTI 8v
Old 04-07-2006, 12:35 AM
  #19  
luckett
Three Wheelin'
 
luckett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA Porsche: '92 968 Blk/Cashmere
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlueDog944
FWIW, all new cars are designed to push. Learned this from several chief instructors and read it somewhere. Seems designers feel that its safer than a car that would tend to step out in the rear.

That 350Z sure doesn't look like it's pushing!
Old 04-07-2006, 03:01 PM
  #20  
ninefiveone
Rennlist Member
 
ninefiveone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 1,567
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

The 350Z pushes too. The folks at 5th gear are very talented at inducing oversteer. It looks great for the cameras and does take a lot of skill to do it well. But it's not the quickest way around a track.

The TT pushes more because it's nose heavy and that's the way its suspension is tuned, not because it's awd. If the V6 motor is heavier than the 1.8t, than the v6 will push even more. You can find plenty of clips of EVO's, STI's, and S4's in lurid power oversteer. You can even find a few FWD cars people have tuned for oversteer.

As with any FWD, AWD, or RWD car, you can put the effort into suspension tuning that will make a car understeer, oversteer, or be pretty neutral. There are limits to that but 80% of cars can be tuned to perform decently around a track.

The 924/944 chasis has some things going for it that make it a little easier to tune: 50/50 weight distribution and relatively light weight being two major characteristics. RWD comes in a solid third behind those two.

But the 924/944 suspension design isn't anything special. Struts up front, trailing arm in the back... not really very glorious. Struts, particularly in the pretty standard manner that they're implemented in a 924/944 aren't great performers at the extremes of travel. You have to spring and damp it very firmly to get good performace out of it and that will come at the cost of really making the ride poor.

Trailing arms are a pretty old approach that unlike struts, has been largely abandoned in new suspension designs. All these new multi-link rear suspensions do a much better job of keeping the contact patch on the ground, controlling body roll, and delivering compliant ride.

One of the things being discussed here is handling and we're seeing the wide variations in what someone thinks constitutes good handling. Good handling on the street isn't the same as good handling on a track.

Back to the question orignially asked: I would use the TT for a daily driver. It's going to be way more comfortable and way more reliable.
Old 04-07-2006, 03:21 PM
  #21  
cjeckert
Drifting
 
cjeckert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Shirley Ma
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The only thing is its terribly unpratical, you cant really fit anything in the "trunk" and the rear seats are tiny alot less room then the 924s. But overall its any enjoyible car to drive around but i just didnt like it when i took it to autocross.
Old 04-07-2006, 11:26 PM
  #22  
luckett
Three Wheelin'
 
luckett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA Porsche: '92 968 Blk/Cashmere
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ninefiveone
The TT pushes more because it's nose heavy and that's the way its suspension is tuned, not because it's awd.

Actually, the weight distribution is not very different:
350Z 53 front / 47 rear
TT 58 front / 42 rear

This is a gross oversimplification of the dynamics that occur, but the AWD can contribute to the understeer since the front tires are subject to the lateral and longitudinal forces acting upon the tire's contact surface during acceleration while cornering. In a RWD car, the tires are only subject to the lateral forces. It just depends upon where the F/R tires are relative to their peak lateral force..
Old 04-08-2006, 03:29 PM
  #23  
ninefiveone
Rennlist Member
 
ninefiveone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 1,567
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

That difference is actually quite substantial. Especially since neither car is a real lightweight.

The TT is 200lbs heavier in the front, and a similar 200 lbs lighter in the rear than a 350Z. Not to oversimplify but that's a big difference in weight distribution.

The TT is carrying 2 good sized people on the front axle, and none on the rear.

The 350 Z is carrying the same two people but one on the front axle and one on the rear.

Since good performance at the track has a lot to do with weight dynamics and managing that weight transfer, that's a pretty significant disadvantage.

It gets more significant when you consider the limits of adhesion as the cars start reaching their performance envelopes. All things being equal, the suspensions would be identical and they would be on identical tires. You can soften the front suspension, and stiffen the rear of the TT to get neutral handling but the most g forces it will generate will never be as high as the 350Z since the Z will always be pushing the front tires with 200lbs less weight. Actually, i think if I did the math/physics, it might even be more pronounced than the empirical differences in weights... Levers and such. But i'm old and physics class was a long time ago.

To make things worse, the TT doesn't have a particularly great front suspension design. More or less the same as on our 924/944's. A humble but effective strut. A quick search on the Z indicates it's got a 3 link front suspension that looks to be more like a double a-arm setup. That's going to keep camber changes to a minimum throughout suspension travel unlike our strut setup that starts getting into really bad positive camber at the extremes of travel that you get under hard cornering.

Now throw in what Chris brings up which is that an AWD setup pushing any power to the front wheels at the limit will push a tire out of it's friction envelope... but the diffs should be reproportioning power so that shouldn't be a problem.

Ah but looking at audi's website, only the Q7, S4, and RS4 will send 100% of the power to a given axle... the TT will only ever shift up to 67% to a given axle. That's a real problem for track performance... I wonder if there are aftermarket diffs to solve for that? Maybe it's possible to swap in an S4 diff?

Long story short, unless you're competitively racing, I doubt a TT will be a bad track ride but it has a few more challenges out of the box.
Old 04-08-2006, 04:17 PM
  #24  
Dave in Chicago
Rennlist Member
 
Dave in Chicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 2,879
Received 262 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

I would say that you'll probably be better off with the opposite. 944 as the track car and the TT as a DD.
Just keep the 944 and buy some snow tires. I just pulled the snows off my 968. It's a full race set-up with quite obnoxious spring rates, no rubber bushings, etc.

I'll drive it in anything up until the snow is filling the grill
Old 04-08-2006, 05:02 PM
  #25  
xsboost90
Rennlist Member
 
xsboost90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Burlington ky
Posts: 15,223
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bluesky4x4
Get a truck as a daily and a 944 for the track. It's much more fun when you can tow your toys home.
i would have to agree with that!



Quick Reply: Anyone here ever been up against an Audi tt quatro on the track?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:47 AM.