944S, 951, or 968?
09-16-2005 | 04:47 PM
#31
Drifting
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,089
Likes: 2
From: Syracuse, NY
Originally Posted by jonnybgood
That is the reason for my comment on the first page. The first generation 16v needed 3l to make it worthwhile.
09-16-2005 | 05:12 PM
#33
Burning Brakes
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by Scootin159
Not that it changes the material of your post at all, but the S2 & 968 had a 3.0L not a 3.1L.
09-16-2005 | 05:23 PM
#34
Drifting
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,089
Likes: 2
From: Syracuse, NY
Originally Posted by jonnybgood
Yeah, that is an l (L) not a 1. proper syntax would have been as you wrote, 3.0L
Whoever decided that an I l and 1 all look identical should be slapped btw. Same with 0, O, D & B; 5 & S; U, V & Y; K & X; C & G, etc.
