Messing with the FQS for fuel economy?
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am thinking about moving the fuel quality switch to position 2 (and if I get daring, position 6) in interest of fuel economy.
I know the theory behind it, and the pros and cons of running under a lean burn condition.
My question is... has anyone done it? Is the closed loop program just going to override my adjustment?
I know the theory behind it, and the pros and cons of running under a lean burn condition.
![ducking](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon107.gif)
My question is... has anyone done it? Is the closed loop program just going to override my adjustment?
#3
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not to revive a dead thread...but according to Wilks page, the later model cars DO adjust both fuel and timing with the FQS.
http://frwilk.com/944dme/fqswitch.htm
I only noticed because I'm fiddling with this today.
http://frwilk.com/944dme/fqswitch.htm
I only noticed because I'm fiddling with this today.