Dissapointed by a Mini ot??
#17
Ummm...I think so...
I think it goes something like
"I don't mean to sound arrogant, but you're f'n wrong ***..."
did that work?
Anyway, here's my reasoning for the 924S feeling better on the track...
-It's MUCH lighter than the M3, and the turn in and cornering feel much more predictable. you can apex easily, and just all out have a ball.
M3 is incredibly powerful, does handle well, (I"m not saying it doesn't, just IMHO the Porsches are favored) but it's just not as "tossable" as the 924S.
the Turbo, it is noticably heavier on the track. However, once again, it's the predictability of the car. also, it's very powerful as well, and the power delivery is smooth, and it's just all around great. very well balanced.
The M3, the engine and trans are both in the front and doesn't feel as balanced as the 924S and 951S.
I think it goes something like
"I don't mean to sound arrogant, but you're f'n wrong ***..."
did that work?
Anyway, here's my reasoning for the 924S feeling better on the track...
-It's MUCH lighter than the M3, and the turn in and cornering feel much more predictable. you can apex easily, and just all out have a ball.
M3 is incredibly powerful, does handle well, (I"m not saying it doesn't, just IMHO the Porsches are favored) but it's just not as "tossable" as the 924S.
the Turbo, it is noticably heavier on the track. However, once again, it's the predictability of the car. also, it's very powerful as well, and the power delivery is smooth, and it's just all around great. very well balanced.
The M3, the engine and trans are both in the front and doesn't feel as balanced as the 924S and 951S.
#18
Originally Posted by Burma Shave
New Minis are known for lack of power and poor handling, especially the S model. Maybe you should consider D.E?
Unless that was sarcasm.. sorry, I wasn't sure.
I'll give you the power bit. 167 ain't exactly pulling stumps. But thru the twisties we've got Boxster S numbers.
#20
Umm.. she was the slowest in the group, but I don't think it had much to do with the car. Thanks for remembering, gator! Do you think she really pissed some D groupers off? I would have thought the only way to do it was to pass them! It is power deprived yet I matched well driven Boxster S numbers at a local PCA autocross.
#21
Remember she was talking to me about how she thought people were mad. I was like whatever, f them. People were being so gay. I think the guy in the z-06 was mad because I passed him without a point by when I got sick of his garbage and came out of the last turn at his door handle....Bah! I might flying up for the fest. I have to talk to travis and matt. I have 4 day weekends all summer..... Or I might go crazy and put new control arms on my pile and store it up there to do a track day at the mid.
#23
Thanks for the support, G. Yes, I remember what you mean. She was a little concerned. I've had the Mini out on Mid-oh and it is a 2 minute/plus car, and that is sliding the street rubber all over the place. My turbo runs 13 seconds faster than that, on Hoosiers. The power is just a huge dissadvantage. the N/A 944s might find a worthy match there, it all depends. I know I don't want to go out in A group in the Mini anymore. Just like the sig says, it is an Autocrossser!
It would be great to see ya at the fest. This is going to be quite an affair, I don't think I can keep up this pace. 2005 will be remembered as THE Grand Fest, me thinks..
It would be great to see ya at the fest. This is going to be quite an affair, I don't think I can keep up this pace. 2005 will be remembered as THE Grand Fest, me thinks..
#24
Burma Shave: as far as driving school goes, everyone can use it, but I'm pretty confident of my ability (and I know I'm no Ayrton) and this section of road was not technical by any means. I had my foot in it the whole time except for the last corner where I lifted to about 2/3 throttle. Anyway I didn't feel like putting my *** in a ditch because my chutzpah got the better of me.
Anyway, I think 16 year old rubber bushings should be replaced as they gave a unsettling feeling.
Anyway, I think 16 year old rubber bushings should be replaced as they gave a unsettling feeling.
#26
Originally Posted by 944Fest (aka Dan P)
Poor handling, huh? Care to quote anybody? I'd say the opposite.
Unless that was sarcasm.. sorry, I wasn't sure.
I'll give you the power bit. 167 ain't exactly pulling stumps. But thru the twisties we've got Boxster S numbers.
Unless that was sarcasm.. sorry, I wasn't sure.
I'll give you the power bit. 167 ain't exactly pulling stumps. But thru the twisties we've got Boxster S numbers.
#27
Originally Posted by bleucamaro
Burma Shave: as far as driving school goes, everyone can use it, but I'm pretty confident of my ability (and I know I'm no Ayrton) and this section of road was not technical by any means. I had my foot in it the whole time except for the last corner where I lifted to about 2/3 throttle. Anyway I didn't feel like putting my *** in a ditch because my chutzpah got the better of me.
Anyway, I think 16 year old rubber bushings should be replaced as they gave a unsettling feeling.
Anyway, I think 16 year old rubber bushings should be replaced as they gave a unsettling feeling.
#28
Originally Posted by Porschephile 924
Ummm...I think so...
I think it goes something like
"I don't mean to sound arrogant, but you're f'n wrong ***..."
did that work?
Anyway, here's my reasoning for the 924S feeling better on the track...
-It's MUCH lighter than the M3, and the turn in and cornering feel much more predictable. you can apex easily, and just all out have a ball.
M3 is incredibly powerful, does handle well, (I"m not saying it doesn't, just IMHO the Porsches are favored) but it's just not as "tossable" as the 924S.
the Turbo, it is noticably heavier on the track. However, once again, it's the predictability of the car. also, it's very powerful as well, and the power delivery is smooth, and it's just all around great. very well balanced.
The M3, the engine and trans are both in the front and doesn't feel as balanced as the 924S and 951S.
I think it goes something like
"I don't mean to sound arrogant, but you're f'n wrong ***..."
did that work?
Anyway, here's my reasoning for the 924S feeling better on the track...
-It's MUCH lighter than the M3, and the turn in and cornering feel much more predictable. you can apex easily, and just all out have a ball.
M3 is incredibly powerful, does handle well, (I"m not saying it doesn't, just IMHO the Porsches are favored) but it's just not as "tossable" as the 924S.
the Turbo, it is noticably heavier on the track. However, once again, it's the predictability of the car. also, it's very powerful as well, and the power delivery is smooth, and it's just all around great. very well balanced.
The M3, the engine and trans are both in the front and doesn't feel as balanced as the 924S and 951S.
It's nothing to be ashamed of - the 944 handles incredibly well. It's just inferior by design.
#30
Originally Posted by Serge944
What I failed to mention earlier, the m3 is incredibly compliant. You can throw the roughest roads at it and it won't squint. All while handling incredibly well. For a 944 to achieve this level of handling, the spring rates have to be increased (the downside of macpherson struts). Also, the single controls have nothing on a upper and lower setup. As the car leans, the shorter control arm "pulls" on the wheel, therefore generating more camber. Do a search on suspensions, there are other sources who can explain it much better.
It's nothing to be ashamed of - the 944 handles incredibly well. It's just inferior by design.
It's nothing to be ashamed of - the 944 handles incredibly well. It's just inferior by design.