Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Turbo's aren't interference design???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2004, 11:38 PM
  #1  
fezz
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
fezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Turbo's aren't interference design???

I was just reading a Pelican Tech article on timing belts and it said that because of the low compression the turbo is not an interference design?

Really, I have never heard that in over a year on the board. If it is so, I think that makes the turbo all that more attractive. The article went on to say that it didn't mean you would ignore the timing belt. Is this true?
Old 12-01-2004, 11:47 PM
  #2  
SD Porsche Fan
Cast Iron Man
Rennlist Member
 
SD Porsche Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 8,693
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've read in numerous places that they are all interference motors (NA, 951, S, S2 it doesn't matter). Are you sure they weren't talking about a 924T?
Old 12-01-2004, 11:49 PM
  #3  
85944na
Racer
 
85944na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no, the turbo is an interference engine
Old 12-01-2004, 11:50 PM
  #4  
Dave
Race Car
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Springfield NJ
Posts: 4,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Something tells me were about to see a few posts from turbo owners who've replaced bent valves!
Old 12-01-2004, 11:58 PM
  #5  
Matt H
Race Director
 
Matt H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

They are dead wrong, it is most certainly an interference design.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 12-01-2004, 11:58 PM
  #6  
Techno Duck
Nordschleife Master
 
Techno Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I believe only the 924 was a non interference motor. The 'interference' i believe started with the 931.
Old 12-01-2004, 11:58 PM
  #7  
fezz
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
fezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

so what the hell was i reading?? - i guess i have to read that again.
Old 12-01-2004, 11:59 PM
  #8  
Mighty Shilling
Wax On, Wax Off
Rennlist Member
 
Mighty Shilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 5280 ft above the sea
Posts: 17,727
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

the only Porsche in the series that I know of that isn't an interference design is the 924 NA...IIRC the 924 Turbo (a.k.a. 931 [just showing off my porsche knowledge ]) is an interference, as is the 924S, 944, 951, 944S, 944S2, and 968
Old 12-02-2004, 12:00 AM
  #9  
Gator_86_951
Spell Checker
Rennlist Member
 
Gator_86_951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 21,357
Received 393 Likes on 296 Posts
Default

Yes the 944 turbo is an nterference motor.
Old 12-02-2004, 12:07 AM
  #10  
fezz
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
fezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

found it again: from Pelican tech articles: Affordable Porsches:
see near bottom about turbo's

The 944 has several major pluses, from its modern design to its galvanized bodywork, but there are a few problem areas that need to be addressed. For one, these engines feature an interference design, so a broken timing belt can be an expensive problem as the valves meet the pistons. Figure a grand or two to fix that mess. Old oil and coolant seals can be a cause of belt problems, as these liquids attack rubber engine components. Worn engine mounts are also common, and Randy reports seeing lots of water pump problems. "Water pumps can be a pretty weak spot on that car," he reports. The hot fix there is to upgrade to the 944 Turbo water pump. Sunroof assemblies can also be a problem. "The cable system gets goofy," Randy says, and replacement parts can be hard to find. Unfortunately, buying a new sunroof assembly may be the only fix. He has also seen rear windows leak, more on cars from hot climates.

The cars feature good electronics, although problems can come up. Electrolyte and acid leaks from the battery can attack the alarm controls, while a bad DME relay can immobilize any car. The DME relay controls the engine’s spark and fuel delivery, so our experts recommend carrying a replacement. Engine rebuilds for the 944 are not as pricey as those for the 911, but could still cost a few thousand dollars. As an alternative, Randy says a 968 conversion would be cool, as the later engine features 3.0 liters of displacement, Variocam variable valve timing and a clutch setup that allows easier changes. (The 944 features a rear-mounted transaxle, and clutch changes can be a bear.)

Everything that goes for the 944 pertains to the 944 Turbo models, as more power can only be a good thing. "A good running 944 turbo is a joy," Randy says, even though there is some turbo lag. "It’s pretty much on or off." On the plus side, the 944 Turbo’s lower compression ratio means the engine doesn’t have an interference design. We’re not saying it’s okay to neglect the timing belt, but you’re not totally screwed should it breaks. On the downside, the 944 Turbos still command more money. For $10,000, Randy figures there are two choices: Buy the the world’s nicest "regular" 944, or pick up a 944 Turbo that probably needs some attention. What about the original 924? Wayne says he would shy away from one of them, as the parts are still expensive, the cars don’t have a great performance image, and other Porsches tend to have a larger enthusiast following. Add up those factors, and you have a lot of ratty, unloved cars flooding the marketplace.
Old 12-02-2004, 12:09 AM
  #11  
Mighty Shilling
Wax On, Wax Off
Rennlist Member
 
Mighty Shilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 5280 ft above the sea
Posts: 17,727
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I don't buy it. that article is a load of crap. Ask some turbo owners here who have snapped their timing belts if it's an interference engine or not...
Old 12-02-2004, 12:15 AM
  #12  
Danno
Race Director
 
Danno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 14,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Someone at Pelican must've have been on heavy-duty crack when they wrote that article. Here's some 951 pistons after proving the non-interference theory wrong:



I'll get around to taking picture of 6 bent valves too...
Old 12-02-2004, 12:22 AM
  #13  
Gator_86_951
Spell Checker
Rennlist Member
 
Gator_86_951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 21,357
Received 393 Likes on 296 Posts
Default

I think they are using the interference term a little too tightly here. I am not sure there is even a grade of "interferenceness". It is obviously possible. I guess with the lower compression pistons on the NA 2.5L it is somewhat more possible to have a problem. Whatever. They are flat wrong.
Old 12-02-2004, 12:23 AM
  #14  
fezz
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
fezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well, that settles it.
thanks for posting those pics, Danno.

junk article
Old 12-02-2004, 12:49 AM
  #15  
dualblade
Burning Brakes
 
dualblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

maybe we should ask perry if the turbos are interference! i seem to remember him replacing a few sets of valves...


Quick Reply: Turbo's aren't interference design???



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:20 AM.