Failed Smog, GROSS POLLUTER RESULTS!!
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 951 -> 958 (SOCAL)
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Failed Smog, GROSS POLLUTER RESULTS!!
I failed Smog a couple days ago, what causes these numbers:
TEST RPM %C02 %02 HC(PPM) CO(%) NO(PPM)
15MPH 2597 14.1 0.5 MAX: 116 MAX: 0.74 MAX: 791
TEST: 98 TEST: 0.84 TEST: 2701
25MPH 2438 14.1 0.5 MAX: 91 MAX: 0.62 MAX: 730
TEST: 103 TEST: 0.80 TEST: 2769
So I failed CO, and NO @ 15mph,
And HC, CO, AND, NO (All three ) @ 25mph
Why is my NO soooo high??
I am now designated a Gross Polluter, yay to me!!
TEST RPM %C02 %02 HC(PPM) CO(%) NO(PPM)
15MPH 2597 14.1 0.5 MAX: 116 MAX: 0.74 MAX: 791
TEST: 98 TEST: 0.84 TEST: 2701
25MPH 2438 14.1 0.5 MAX: 91 MAX: 0.62 MAX: 730
TEST: 103 TEST: 0.80 TEST: 2769
So I failed CO, and NO @ 15mph,
And HC, CO, AND, NO (All three ) @ 25mph
Why is my NO soooo high??
I am now designated a Gross Polluter, yay to me!!
#2
Are you running a cat?
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#4
Drifting
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
High NO, low CO would be a definate lean (= vac leak most likely). However with too high CO, it could be something else as well.
Do you know if your O2 sensor is working? If not, you could try replacing it first - the DME uses the O2 readings to adjust mixture in closed loop mode (ie., when not driving full throttle)
Do you know if your O2 sensor is working? If not, you could try replacing it first - the DME uses the O2 readings to adjust mixture in closed loop mode (ie., when not driving full throttle)
#6
Cyrus, put these in a format so the numbers line up, it is impossible to read them this way.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#7
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 951 -> 958 (SOCAL)
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Woah, sorry Matt, didn't know they looked like that.
15mph:
RPM: 2597
%CO2: 14.1
%O2: 0.5
HC(PPM): 98 (Max 116)
CO%: 0.84 (Max 0.74) <--FAIL
NO (PPM): 2701 (Max 791) <--FAIL
25mph:
RPM: 2438
%CO2: 14.1
%O2: 0.5
HC(PPM): 103 (Max 91) <--FAIL
CO%: 0.80 (Max 0.62) <--FAIL
NO (PPM): 2769 (Max 730) <--FAIL
15mph:
RPM: 2597
%CO2: 14.1
%O2: 0.5
HC(PPM): 98 (Max 116)
CO%: 0.84 (Max 0.74) <--FAIL
NO (PPM): 2701 (Max 791) <--FAIL
25mph:
RPM: 2438
%CO2: 14.1
%O2: 0.5
HC(PPM): 103 (Max 91) <--FAIL
CO%: 0.80 (Max 0.62) <--FAIL
NO (PPM): 2769 (Max 730) <--FAIL
Trending Topics
#8
Instructor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Auburn, Washington & San Diego ............................. Terry
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even if you replaced the cat last year, a bad O2 sensor could take it out with too rich of a mixture. You can check the O2 sensor with a multimeter. There have been numerous posts on the O2 sensor/testing/replacing.
#9
In CA, I always did a pre-test just before the real test, to make sure the real test would never be characterized as a gross polluter (if there was a problem passing, I would leave after the pre-test).
You're f-cked, now that the car is a gross polluter, now it's characterized that way for life, right?
You're f-cked, now that the car is a gross polluter, now it's characterized that way for life, right?
#10
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 951 -> 958 (SOCAL)
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Danno posted in my other thread, and confirmed it was the cat.
I'm going to buy a bottle of "Guaranteed to Pass," run it, and install my testpipe back when I pass.
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/app.../hs39032_5.htm
http://www.smogtips.com/gross_polluter.cfm
http://www.national.com/rap/Story/0,1562,26,00.html
Meh, I'll live.
Btw, what's up with Chicago Kevin?
I'm going to buy a bottle of "Guaranteed to Pass," run it, and install my testpipe back when I pass.
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/app.../hs39032_5.htm
http://www.smogtips.com/gross_polluter.cfm
http://www.national.com/rap/Story/0,1562,26,00.html
Meh, I'll live.
Btw, what's up with Chicago Kevin?
#11
Originally Posted by Cyrus951
Danno posted in my other thread, and confirmed it was the cat.
I'm going to buy a bottle of "Guaranteed to Pass," run it, and install my testpipe back when I pass.
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/app.../hs39032_5.htm
http://www.smogtips.com/gross_polluter.cfm
http://www.national.com/rap/Story/0,1562,26,00.html
Meh, I'll live.
Btw, what's up with Chicago Kevin?
I'm going to buy a bottle of "Guaranteed to Pass," run it, and install my testpipe back when I pass.
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/app.../hs39032_5.htm
http://www.smogtips.com/gross_polluter.cfm
http://www.national.com/rap/Story/0,1562,26,00.html
Meh, I'll live.
Btw, what's up with Chicago Kevin?
The a$$cl0wn shut the car off for 20 minutes between the pre-test (which I passed with flying colors) and actual test. He then turned the car on (it was a cold February day) and ran the test with 30 seconds of starting the car - and it almost failed.
Since then, the car was "profiled" and I was only allowed to take the car to a test-only station, even though it never actually failed in any test (1998, 1999, 2001, 2003). They send cars that are likely to fail (according to age of the car and prior emissions results) to a test-only station.
I had thought about mailing my pre-test results in to see if I could be pulled off the list, but I never got around to it.
I moved to Chicago for school - might try to make my way back to Socal in 3 years or so.
#12
Nordschleife Master
I had my poor boyfriend's car do that, and it was the catalytic converter AND O2 sensor!
You bought a BAD cat, man! I did go to a test only station, but I had made friends with the guy, and he did 3 pretests, and I had replaced the O2 sensor, first, brought emissions down, but not enough. I'd replace BOTH.
Then stick them both aside, and stick on your straight pipe, if you wish.
NOW if the cat has been just sitting there, and you've been running your straight pipe, you've possibly have a SERIOUS engine problem developing there, because I've heard of our engines doing pretty good anyway.
BTW - does anyone know if the '83 falls off the SMOG tests, next year?
You bought a BAD cat, man! I did go to a test only station, but I had made friends with the guy, and he did 3 pretests, and I had replaced the O2 sensor, first, brought emissions down, but not enough. I'd replace BOTH.
Then stick them both aside, and stick on your straight pipe, if you wish.
NOW if the cat has been just sitting there, and you've been running your straight pipe, you've possibly have a SERIOUS engine problem developing there, because I've heard of our engines doing pretty good anyway.
BTW - does anyone know if the '83 falls off the SMOG tests, next year?
#15
Race Car
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You know what, i may totally be off here...but i swear ive heard something about keeping our cars in 1 gear up to the 25mph or sometihng like that. Something that technicians shifting our cars too early was changing results due to the engine lugging or something... Anyone else know anything? I swear i read it on the boards somewhere...