Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Would you buy a new 4-cyl Porsche?
Yes
104
59.43%
No
40
22.86%
Not sure
31
17.71%
Voters: 175. You may not vote on this poll

Would you buy a new 4cyl Porsche?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2004 | 09:25 PM
  #16  
Baron009's Avatar
Baron009
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

a lower priced turbo 400hp lightweight speedster is never going to happen.
Yeah exactly. Anyways, thats too much power and likely way too fuel ineffecient (for me). With gas rising so rapidly lately, I seriously think that smaller, compact sports cars or whatever you want to call them, will be very popular in the future.

Anyways, what I'm looking for from Porsche is something like the Mini Cooper S (or the BMW Z3 in coupe form). That car may not be the fastest, and yeah maybe dad's Toyota might be faster or whatever, but it is so fun to drive, handles so incredibly well, and obviously (being a Euro car) it is well built too. A fuel effecient, fun, pretty fast, daily driver basically.

Please don't flame me for saying this, but some of you people are way to obsessed with hp. You should be buying camaros like Tom R or something.
Old 03-05-2004 | 09:31 PM
  #17  
Fixn2xlr8's Avatar
Fixn2xlr8
Bunny with a Mission
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 22,135
Likes: 133
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Default

I f had 30K to dump on a toy right now Id have a whip kickin 968 Turbo replica.
Old 03-05-2004 | 09:32 PM
  #18  
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default

It would have to be turbocharged so that I could realtively easily bump the power up. If it was naturally aspirated....no....there are way too many sedans that make over 250HP now even at 35k.
Old 03-05-2004 | 09:57 PM
  #19  
Peckster's Avatar
Peckster
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,748
Likes: 3
From: Toronto
Default

http://66.139.73.25/lotus.html

Power/weight ratio is key, and it's a lot more expensive to pare weight than stick in a big friggin 8.

If Porsche made a 4 again, sure I'd look at it.

I have to say I'm not impressed with the quality of the Lotus US web site. The photos suck for one thing.
Old 03-05-2004 | 10:05 PM
  #20  
SamGrant951's Avatar
SamGrant951
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,862
Likes: 34
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

one word: caterham.
Old 03-05-2004 | 10:07 PM
  #21  
Baron009's Avatar
Baron009
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

That Lotus Elise rules.
1.8L 4 cyl...
30mpg city....
0-60 in 5.1 seconds...
DAMN!!!
Old 03-06-2004 | 12:58 AM
  #22  
Blue S2's Avatar
Blue S2
Race Car
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Washington, D.C.
Default

Yeah, Lotus Elise is quite a car! Something small and light, with a decent engine would be perfect. As long as the engine can be tuned pretty easily, people can beef it up as much as they want. Just like the 951.
Old 03-06-2004 | 03:21 AM
  #23  
86 951 Driver's Avatar
86 951 Driver
Race Car
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,638
Likes: 1
From: KC, MO
Default

I am going to have to say no. The SRT-4 would prolly be faster in straight line which is just embarassing. At least a regualr 944 can out handle it. I say they should make a new 944 with a 3.0 ltr turbo. Sounds like a nice idea any way. What do I know though
Old 03-06-2004 | 03:46 AM
  #24  
theedge's Avatar
theedge
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 3
From: Canada, Eh?
Default

Id love to get a Lotus Elise, screw passengers its all about me and one other person. I hear the Toyota engine in it isnt much for porced induction, but who knows whats gonna happen.

As to a new 4 cyl.... There a very few 4 cyls out right now that id consider. Honda S2000.... Meh, needs a better power curve. SRT4.... Just a fast Neon, I dont even like looking at them no way id want to OWN one. Butt freaking ugly too. WRX STi, yeah that makes the list for sure.

I prefer older cars. Look what the early 90s had, the MR2 Turbo, Nissan 240SXs, cars with potential, looks and handling. Look what we have now.... Cars that come from the factory with rice.

A new Porsche 4 cyl? Yeah id buy it if I could afford it and I liked the looks, and it is a decent performer.
Old 03-06-2004 | 05:14 AM
  #25  
MTM's Avatar
MTM
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 591
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, California
Default

I would really like to try an S2000. It can go over 50 mph in first gear!
Old 03-06-2004 | 08:53 AM
  #26  
sweanders's Avatar
sweanders
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 2
From: Sweden
Default

Originally posted by Blue S2
Yeah, Lotus Elise is quite a car! Something small and light, with a decent engine would be perfect. As long as the engine can be tuned pretty easily, people can beef it up as much as they want. Just like the 951.
The only downside with the Elise is that is has no room for luggage worth mentioning and it has a low top speed.
Old 03-06-2004 | 08:54 AM
  #27  
sweanders's Avatar
sweanders
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 2
From: Sweden
Default

Originally posted by MTM
I would really like to try an S2000. It can go over 50 mph in first gear!
Well.. That's what my 928GT does as well and I bet that it gets there faster..
Old 03-06-2004 | 09:22 AM
  #28  
tifosiman's Avatar
tifosiman
Race Director
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,208
Likes: 16
From: The Heart of it All
Default

Originally posted by Peckster


Power/weight ratio is key, and it's a lot more expensive to pare weight than stick in a big friggin 8.
Peckster nailed it right on the head. It would be very difficult for a car company to make a lightweight for US distribution. NHTSA testing would kill it right away. Crumple zones, airbags in every direction, high impact bumpers, ABS, all conspire to raise weight. I would shudder to think how much more my car would weigh if it were produced today. Just look at how much more the New Beetle weighs than the Old Beetle. Not that there is anything wrong with safety at all, I'm all for it, given the ever-growing number of cell-phone using, big-mac eating, focktard drivers out there.

I think that's the reason that your average new 4-door crap-box sedan has more HP than my car. It has to, because it has a lot of weight to overcome.

This conversation is just highly theoretical, anyway. How much of a market for a bare bones, no frills 4cyl Porsche lightweight would there really be nowadays? You and I would want one, but the average person that buys a new Porsche wants PSM and SatNav, along with heated seats and XM radio. I'd be willing to bet that if the marketing guys at Porsche did a detailed study/survey, and then presented it to the shareholders, the project would be stillborn in the first tri-mester. (the exotic GT3 variants and CGT cars attract a whole different crowd of buyers)

Jeremy
Old 03-06-2004 | 10:44 AM
  #29  
Joe Anstett's Avatar
Joe Anstett
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Chester, NJ
Default

Originally posted by Baron009
Yeah exactly. Anyways, thats too much power and likely way too fuel ineffecient (for me). With gas rising so rapidly lately, I seriously think that smaller, compact sports cars or whatever you want to call them, will be very popular in the future.
Hmm, that's an angle I hadn't thought of before. I've been reading that the next Mitsubishi Eclipse should be an AWD turbo hybrid, the first hybrid to wring some performance out of the electric motor (think about it, all the torque comes in below 1200 RPM).

How about a small, lightweight stripper under $30k, and go technology crazy with a hybrid AWD system. I'd buy it.

I hate to say it, but the Boxster is too expensive for too little car. If I plunk down $50k on a car, sorry guys I'm getting a Z06 (best bang for the buck at any price).

Please don't flame me for saying this, but some of you people are way to obsessed with hp. You should be buying camaros like Tom R or something.
See above There's something to be said for high horsepower cars that can handle too.
Old 03-06-2004 | 10:55 AM
  #30  
Joe Anstett's Avatar
Joe Anstett
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Chester, NJ
Default

Originally posted by tifosiman
This conversation is just highly theoretical, anyway. How much of a market for a bare bones, no frills 4cyl Porsche lightweight would there really be nowadays? You and I would want one, but the average person that buys a new Porsche wants PSM and SatNav, along with heated seats and XM radio.
Let them buy Cayennes then! Give us sports cars!

IMO Porsche has missed out on a lot in the sports car market by not targeting sports car enthusiasts who don't have $90k to drop on a 911.

Look at the success of the Miata (why wasn't that done by Porsche?). Heck, look at the success of the Infiniti G35 coupe (that could have been a modern 944 by Porsche). Heck even as someone else mentioned, the Mini. Cheap. No BS. Fun to drive. That used to be what sports cars were about.

Sorry, today's Porsche is all about image and living off the past.


Quick Reply: Would you buy a new 4cyl Porsche?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:03 AM.