k27HF
09-13-2011, 06:02 PM
#16
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbo Kraft posted dyno results with CIS in another post I saw. CIS should not matter when it comes to a more efficient turbo.. cooler air charge is cooler air.. 15lbs boost with a turbo that is working harder is going to shot hotter air into the motor.. I trust Turbo Kraft 100% after seeing the builds he does.
09-13-2011, 06:10 PM
#18
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is part of the answer Turbo Kraft gave on a post on Pelilcan Parts ( Garret gt35r on CIS)
Performance
In our experience, they simply out-perform the K27 turbo and its variants.
We've had 3.0L through 3.6L Turbos on the Dynapack chassis dyno, fitted with everything from old-school K27-7006s up through a K27-based HiFlow-something-or-other hybrid (huge compressor wheel mated to K27 turbo) from iA on a rather modified '94 3.6T with CIS. The GT35R blew it away in both response and power.
Later in the post he also post dyno numbers with CIS ck out the post...
Performance
In our experience, they simply out-perform the K27 turbo and its variants.
We've had 3.0L through 3.6L Turbos on the Dynapack chassis dyno, fitted with everything from old-school K27-7006s up through a K27-based HiFlow-something-or-other hybrid (huge compressor wheel mated to K27 turbo) from iA on a rather modified '94 3.6T with CIS. The GT35R blew it away in both response and power.
Later in the post he also post dyno numbers with CIS ck out the post...
