Notices
911 Turbo (930) Forum 1975-1989

930 cam upgrade - SC or 964?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2009, 09:29 PM
  #1  
Millhaus
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Millhaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 930 cam upgrade - SC or 964?

I am rebuilding my 930 motor. I was planning on the SC cam upgrade but others have mentioned the stock 964 cam upgrade instead.

Opinions and suggestions?

(stock 1980, 930 motor with euro fuel system, K27-7200, 1 bar spring, GHL muffler and stock IC)
Old 12-21-2009, 11:12 PM
  #2  
stahwille
Intermediate
 
stahwille's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default cam up for turbo

Hey there mill, Can only speak from experience building , testing , and owning 78 or later 930 engines. The SC camshafts are exciting performence enhancment , and work well with CIS injection. No flat spots, no cold stumble , just improved torque from 1500 - 6000 rpm. However , you must have SC or aftermarket exhaust to match. check this and confirm what exhaust / header system you have or will use. ALSO Turbo cylinder heads as most 911 heads may be flycut when rebuilding up to 1mm. This will increase compression , so be mindfull; every things a trade off but if done correctly .... priceless fun!
Old 12-22-2009, 12:25 AM
  #3  
dt930
Rennlist Member
 
dt930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 34
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have hade both 964 an sc cams in mine, the 964 cams seem to have more high rpm power than the sc cams. I guess it depends on what you want and where you use the car, mine is track only and operates from around 5 to 7K rpm most of the time. The 964 cams don't run out of breath on top.
Old 12-22-2009, 04:01 PM
  #4  
JFairman
Racer
 
JFairman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All depends where you want the powerband, more down low and in the middle rpms or up high from 4500- 7000rpms.
964 cams will move the powerband around 1000rpms higher than SC cams.

SC cam powerband is better for city and all around driving, while the 964 cams powerband is dull at lower rpms and then they come alive around 4000rpm and make more power during highway and track driving.

If that is confusing it's best you drive a car with each setup to decide for yourself, and you would have to have the same turbocharger in each car to feel the difference in cams alone because some people put in a turbo with a larger hot side or turbine housing and wheel with less exhaust back pressure like a k27 7006 to match the higher rpm 964 cam's powerband.

If you like low end torque getting away from stoplights during city driving more than highway driving with a top end speed rush to redline, or thats more practical on the roads you drive on... than you will probably be happier with SC cams and a k27 7200 turbo to match them.

With all that said 930 ignition timing is extremely_retarded and conservative at idle and low speeds below 3000rpm before the turbo starts spooling up.
There is an amazing amount of low end torque that was left untapped by retarding the timing so much at low speeds in the interest of higher exhaust temps to heat up the catalytic converter faster and pass emission testing... but thats another topic that hasn't been discussed much on rennlist.

There's a long thread on this over on pelican.
Old 12-22-2009, 05:54 PM
  #5  
Metal Guru
Rennlist Member
 
Metal Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, Mi.
Posts: 4,521
Received 429 Likes on 309 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stahwille
ALSO Turbo cylinder heads as most 911 heads may be flycut when rebuilding up to 1mm.
I wouldn't do this.
Screws up cam chain lengths.
Better to buy new pistons if a bump in compression is required.
Old 12-22-2009, 07:38 PM
  #6  
pdqcarrera
Rennlist Member
 
pdqcarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Surf City, Left Coast,
Posts: 333
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

How about a custom hybrid of the two (which I understand Web Cam can do)...?
http://www.webcamshafts.com/pages/au..._sohc_12v.html
Old 12-23-2009, 11:00 PM
  #7  
stahwille
Intermediate
 
stahwille's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default cam s / chains

Good point metle guru , all the more reason to rebuild with new chains and chain sprockets, to minimize chain tension interferience issues.. Also if flycutting heads one should flycut timing chain housing boxes accordingly for correct fit. I still stand by flycutting when done correctly as it greatly improves lowend torque / compression , something all 3.3l turbo enginges lack.
Old 12-24-2009, 09:34 AM
  #8  
Metal Guru
Rennlist Member
 
Metal Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, Mi.
Posts: 4,521
Received 429 Likes on 309 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stahwille
Good point metle guru , all the more reason to rebuild with new chains and chain sprockets, to minimize chain tension interferience issues.. Also if flycutting heads one should flycut timing chain housing boxes accordingly for correct fit. I still stand by flycutting when done correctly as it greatly improves lowend torque / compression , something all 3.3l turbo enginges lack.
To clarify, I have no first hand experience with this but there are a few over on Pelicanparts that have fly cut heads and wouldn't do it again.
For my part, I wouldn't be happy to crack into an engine only to find that this had been done to it; just a pain in the butt to deal with.
Old 01-10-2010, 08:32 PM
  #9  
ZX3tuning
Instructor
 
ZX3tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

we just installed the 964s on our 930 and while the power isn't as neck snapping down low, it more than makes up for it up top. i'm more than happy with the outcome despite some suggesting it's powerband is laggy, it still feels much stronger even off boost!
Old 01-14-2010, 09:34 PM
  #10  
Turtletime
Intermediate
 
Turtletime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What are Group B camshafts? Where do they optimize power band?
Old 01-15-2010, 08:32 AM
  #11  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Group B camshafts were from the 935 era and are designed to work with individual throttle body mechanical injected engines. They are old technology and I'd look to something else.
Old 01-16-2010, 11:11 PM
  #12  
Turtletime
Intermediate
 
Turtletime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How well would these work with EFI and twin plugs?
Old 10-28-2012, 11:14 PM
  #13  
juans930
3rd Gear
 
juans930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any one knows what is the best cam timing for SC cams on the 3.3 turbo engine, for street driving??
The engine has JE 7.5 CR pistons with SC cams gt35 garret turbo and fabspeed exhaust and long neck intercooler, I have them at 1.4mm, but haven't run the engine.
Old 10-29-2012, 12:37 PM
  #14  
9Eleven
Three Wheelin'
 
9Eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne Beach, Fl
Posts: 1,793
Received 61 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

So SC Cams produce more power/torque at a lower rpm?

Last edited by 9Eleven; 10-29-2012 at 02:41 PM.
Old 10-29-2012, 03:00 PM
  #15  
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Yargk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,219
Received 226 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

How do SC330 cams compare to SC and 964?

I'm with pdqcarrera, a hybrid seems optimal (just by looking at some dyno plots).

Also, at what rpm do you need to worry about the valves? On a track car?


Quick Reply: 930 cam upgrade - SC or 964?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:12 PM.