Notices
911 Turbo (930) Forum 1975-1989

Going Super Fast intercoolers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2006, 10:55 PM
  #16  
schnele
Rennlist Member
 
schnele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry about my conspicuous consumption of bandwidth but I thought this was important to better understand the significance of a properly suited intercooler.
Old 07-06-2006, 10:56 PM
  #17  
rs911t
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
rs911t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by schnele
Sorry about my conspicuous consumption of bandwidth but I thought this was important to better understand the significance of a properly suited intercooler.
Thanks! Lots of good info at their web site.
Old 07-06-2006, 10:58 PM
  #18  
TrackDays247.com
Former Vendor
 
TrackDays247.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 4,299
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

His beef was with the GSF end tank design.
Old 07-06-2006, 11:32 PM
  #19  
911T
Instructor
 
911T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I still stand by, " You get what you pay for".
Old 07-06-2006, 11:46 PM
  #20  
DeanM
Intermediate
 
DeanM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MA USA
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911T
I still stand by, " You get what you pay for".

I agree

One reason a good intercooler costs a lot of money is cause it takes time to make. And if you want to make money you have to charge for that time. Duh

I am certainly not going to work for nothing.

Dean
Old 07-07-2006, 12:12 AM
  #21  
mppickett
Intermediate
 
mppickett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As im4duke noted, I have one of the GSF intercoolers and am dyno testing tomorrow. I'll post the results back on this forum. Just so you know, I bought solely for price and perceived ability to chill the air, not any real analysis. In my datalogging I don't see any rise in intake temps during full boost so it seems to be doing ok. I haven't checked it for drop in boost or contribution to lag. It isn't the cleanest looking intercooler I've ever seen, but the price is right. More tomorrow...

Mike
Old 07-07-2006, 12:46 AM
  #22  
DonE
Burning Brakes
 
DonE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: St Johns, FL
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got my IC from Bell, designed by Brian Keith Smith (if I remember correctly). The IC came to me, delivered in 11 days, for $1100. I had to weld the mounts.

I've found that a dyno is a poor test for an IC because of heat soak and no matter how many fans you have on it, it does not simulate the road or track. During my last dyno (an engine dyno), the enclosed room could move 11,000 cfm of ambient air but this was still not enough to keep IAT temps in check.

In addition, I use a GT2 tail which bathes the IC in plenty of ambient air. Rarely do I see temps more than 10C over ambient in the car.
Old 07-07-2006, 02:14 AM
  #23  
ProtoCab
Racer
 
ProtoCab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any pics, DonE?
Old 07-07-2006, 09:22 AM
  #24  
rs911t
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
rs911t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DonE
In addition, I use a GT2 tail which bathes the IC in plenty of ambient air. Rarely do I see temps more than 10C over ambient in the car.
That brings up another question. An earlier thread talked alot about shrouding the I/C so the engine fan would draw air thru the I/C.

So, what's the design goal with the GT2 tail? To simply flood the engine compartment with more air? Or does it push air up thru the I/C?
Old 07-07-2006, 11:18 AM
  #25  
slownrusty
Rennlist Member
 
slownrusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,874
Received 335 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DonE
In addition, I use a GT2 tail which bathes the IC in plenty of ambient air. Rarely do I see temps more than 10C over ambient in the car.
10C over ambient is pretty good!! I need to get that tail on my car.

Yasin
Old 07-07-2006, 11:41 AM
  #26  
TrackDays247.com
Former Vendor
 
TrackDays247.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 4,299
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Shroud - IMO a must:

Last edited by TrackDays247.com; 03-25-2009 at 02:37 PM.
Old 07-07-2006, 11:54 AM
  #27  
DonE
Burning Brakes
 
DonE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: St Johns, FL
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rs911t
That brings up another question. An earlier thread talked alot about shrouding the I/C so the engine fan would draw air thru the I/C.

So, what's the design goal with the GT2 tail? To simply flood the engine compartment with more air? Or does it push air up thru the I/C?
With the large side openings, it draws in a lot of air. Ironically, I think the biggest benefit is that this supplies my intake with cool air and not engine-bay warmed air. I think that goes a long way towards lowering temps. I am not sure how much air is actually pulled down through the IC since the louvered tail section nearly sits directly on top of the IC. At speed, I think the fan has no affect on pulling air down through the IC.

Speaking of geeky, I like to open the tail right after a hard mountain drive and feel how cool in the IC is where it meets my throttle body pipe. There is a big difference between that side and the turbo side.
Old 07-07-2006, 12:34 PM
  #28  
Porschefile
Three Wheelin'
 
Porschefile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jesus, $3-4k for a larger intercooler? Did Ferrari by Porsche or something? If you price out the bare materials for a core and end tanks, depending on the quality of parts, the parts alone are generally anywhere from $500-1000 for decent quality stuff like a Spearco core. So at $3-4k those guys are charging a ~300-400% markup, simply because they are reputable people and know that there are few other retailers for us to choose from. I can understand $1-2k for a very nice IC, as it takes time and skill to weld aluminum nicely.

Looking at the Goingsuperfast IC, I have to side with Slownrusty. The end tanks could be a little more round, though I doubt if there would be any significant improvement in horsepower or drop in intake temps from doing this (at least not a $2-$4k difference!). Plus, on top of that Goingsuperfast wins as the coolest company name IMO, so that has to be worth some points!
Old 07-07-2006, 01:48 PM
  #29  
rs911t
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
rs911t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I originally thought the inlets on the GT2 tail supplied air to the turbo intakes on either side. I'm curious if it was dedicated to that purpose (shroud, air box, etc) or just open like it is with mine.

Anybody have a picture of a GT2 Evo engine compartment, sans IC?
Old 07-07-2006, 02:14 PM
  #30  
TrackDays247.com
Former Vendor
 
TrackDays247.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 4,299
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

My setup above draws in intake air that is exactly 13 degrees above ambient.
A cold air box + a fully shrouded IC is the way to go - I've yet to do both


Quick Reply: Going Super Fast intercoolers



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:28 AM.