Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Air Filters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2015, 03:58 PM
  #1  
73911
Racer
Thread Starter
 
73911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Air Filters

Here's an article I wrote about air filters.



Richard Newton
Old 10-29-2015, 12:31 AM
  #2  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Whats lacking in the article is the distinction between the filtration requirements for street engines that should last 200K and for race engines which should last anywhere from 25 to 200 hours.

BIG difference.
Old 10-29-2015, 05:36 AM
  #3  
Mondrian
Three Wheelin'
 
Mondrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Quote "...A 10-inch diameter filter that’s 2-inches tall will flow more air than a 5-inch diameter filter that is 4-inches tall..."

Why? If both filters offer same media with same surface area & efficiency the volume of air going through the filter should be the same unless restricted by intake!
Old 10-29-2015, 08:19 AM
  #4  
73911
Racer
Thread Starter
 
73911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mondrian - That makes sense to me. Not to the people who make the filters though.

My column is limited to 800 words. Sometimes I just can't cover everything in that space. I try though.

Richard Newton
Old 10-29-2015, 09:38 AM
  #5  
Jherriott
Rennlist Member
 
Jherriott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 662
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mondrian
Quote "...A 10-inch diameter filter that’s 2-inches tall will flow more air than a 5-inch diameter filter that is 4-inches tall..."

Why? If both filters offer same media with same surface area & efficiency the volume of air going through the filter should be the same unless restricted by intake!

If you put a piece of 2" thick foam over your mouth and inhale, then do the same with a piece of 5" thick foam... You will understand
Old 10-29-2015, 02:24 PM
  #6  
Mondrian
Three Wheelin'
 
Mondrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jherriott
If you put a piece of 2" thick foam over your mouth and inhale, then do the same with a piece of 5" thick foam... You will understand
What length & width?
Old 10-29-2015, 10:16 PM
  #7  
Jherriott
Rennlist Member
 
Jherriott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 662
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mondrian
What length & width?
LOL! I'm not touching that with a 10' piece of foam! :P
Old 10-30-2015, 02:00 AM
  #8  
Mondrian
Three Wheelin'
 
Mondrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 73911
Mondrian - That makes sense to the people who make the filters though.

My column is limited to 800 words. Sometimes I just can't cover everything in that space. I try though.

Richard Newton
Really appreciative of sharing the article but personally I wished for more quality content in those 800 words. As steve pointed out no mention of downside when switching from OEM filters to performance/race filters!

As an example I'd like to know how additional air flow volume is achieved, via an increase in filter media surface area or reduction in filter efficiency or both.

Last edited by Mondrian; 10-30-2015 at 02:47 AM.
Old 10-30-2015, 08:12 AM
  #9  
73911
Racer
Thread Starter
 
73911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One thing to consider about flow rates is that they only become critical at WOT. You seldom use WOT on the street. Folks on another forum pointed that out.

The reality is that for most of us the OEM filter may be the best filter. Here's a link to some work the folks on the Nissan forum did.

Richard Newton
Old 10-30-2015, 10:36 AM
  #10  
Mondrian
Three Wheelin'
 
Mondrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Exactly. Most see filter as the cheapest route to performance gain or the finishing touch to that 20k rebuilt but as the Nissan article says .... " Compared to the AC, the K&N “plugged up” nearly 3 times faster, passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
Old 10-30-2015, 12:36 PM
  #11  
Reiver
Drifting
 
Reiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,526
Received 115 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mondrian
Exactly. Most see filter as the cheapest route to performance gain or the finishing touch to that 20k rebuilt but as the Nissan article says .... " Compared to the AC, the K&N “plugged up” nearly 3 times faster, passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
That's my experience. Tried one on my SBC Hot Rod 4 barrel and kept plugging my idle jets with dust/dirt. Went to a paper/stock filter and never another issue.
I get the heebie jeebies when I see one 'oiled' on a Porsche.



Quick Reply: Air Filters



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:52 AM.