Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Low versus high-end torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2003, 06:51 AM
  #1  
docsuresh
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
docsuresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Low versus high-end torque

1977 911s with 2.7 motor and low miles. Most everyone who has driven this car agrees that it runs great especially over 4000, but is surprisingly low on power at the low end of the range (<2000). Is that “normal”? Is the power band on this biased to the high end that much?

Thanks.
Old 07-21-2003, 08:09 AM
  #2  
MAS
Racer
 
MAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No, not on my (Canadian) 77 2.7 911. In fact, if anything, the 2.7 is very strong in the low-midrange. By that I mean, it pulls hard from about 2k and up.

My guess is that you have a "hotter" cam than stock.


-MAS
Old 07-21-2003, 09:21 AM
  #3  
wwest
Drifting
 
wwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: redmond wa
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

My 1978 SC Targa engine definitely comes "on" at and after 4000 RPM.

Absolutely STOCK.
Old 07-21-2003, 09:23 AM
  #4  
SPDRacer
Instructor
 
SPDRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Most 911s have this problem. But normally the cars are driven above 3500 keeping the power on demand for that quick pass or coming out of a corner. These engines are made for horsepower not torque. I do have an early 911, so I don't have the torque issue as much as the later 911s that have emissions equipment.
Hope this answers your question
Old 07-21-2003, 09:42 AM
  #5  
MAS
Racer
 
MAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Regarding the SCs vs the 2.7 litre engines. I've driven several SCs, and oddly enough, they are peakier (the power comes on higher) than the 2.7's. I'm not sure why this is, but a typical 2.7 should have reasonably good low end pull. As I mentioned before, it's likely that you have a non-stock cam(s).

-MAS
Old 07-21-2003, 10:12 AM
  #6  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Your observations about your engine are entirely normal. Thats simply the way these feel.

Just look at the HP/torque graphs at the back of the owner's manual and you will see this for yourself. Note the shape of the torque curve,...

Its possible that someone slipped a set of SC cams in there but CIS engines cannot tolerate much cam at all and the choices are all very close to each other.
Old 07-21-2003, 02:27 PM
  #7  
CamB
Instructor
 
CamB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've read plenty of threads on this in the past, and the majority of 911 owners don't drive under 2000rpm (except while pulling away).

It's normal.
Old 07-25-2003, 12:42 AM
  #8  
RoninLB
Pro
 
RoninLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, N.Y.
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

a '77 Calif dizzy has a vacuum retard that met then current smog requirements.. the routine is to plug the vac line.. then set your total timing.. low rpm operation should noticably increase using only mechanical advance.. and the oil temp may decrease.............Ron



Quick Reply: Low versus high-end torque



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:24 AM.