Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Really? 84 3.2 car backdated to 911 ST worth >$100k?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:54 PM
  #16  
irobertson
Rennlist Member
 
irobertson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brockville, ON
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah, I saw this last night, enjoyed the pics, and scratched my head at the price.
Not sure I'm digging the red intakes on the motor, and I'm also curios about the heat controls. Is that some kind of manual/automatic heat hybrid?
Old 01-11-2013, 10:14 PM
  #17  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,522
Received 81 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by amber lamps
Am I missing something? What is a "Carrera 920"?
Sorry, you don't have proper clearance.
Old 01-11-2013, 10:39 PM
  #18  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Hughes
Sorry, you don't have proper clearance.
So it was the rally car series like Team Alumiata's re-creation. Got it.
Old 01-13-2013, 10:49 PM
  #19  
Dr Mitch
Burning Brakes
 
Dr Mitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 768
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

C'mon, the full resto includes an ipod adapter, has be worth SOMETHING no?
Old 01-13-2013, 11:12 PM
  #20  
NickyP
Rennlist Member
 
NickyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Solana Beach
Posts: 299
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Not for that car IMHO. While its easy to spend upwards of $100K on a RS/RSR/ST build-- take your pick-- whether you are backdating or starting with a longhood, at least do it right. Again, and in my opinion the heart and soul of an above referenced early car is the engine and a 3.2 Carrera engine just doesn't cut it. A great motor for sure, but to me it just doesn't look right in an ST build. Also, the flares aren't right (they look like 930 flares to me) and a bunch of other details are off. A nice car, no doubt, but to me it's just gotta' be closer to the mark...my 2 cents.
Old 01-14-2013, 11:42 AM
  #21  
Wachuko
Professor of Pending Projects
Rennlist Member
 
Wachuko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,891
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by Reiver
Hey Dr. Evil....what do you think you'd be paying for labor on your build if you were sourcing it out?
I have no idea... but I am not going all out like this guy did... I am not going to make every part look like new by powder coating, electroplating, whatever, I wish I had the budget to do just that but I don't and I really want to drive this thing as soon as possible...

I am just cleaning, replacing worn items/parts, and proactively replacing parts that are prone to problems.

Back to this car, completely agree... it really calls for 6 trumpets in that engine bay... nothing looks like a flat six with trumpets... Someday I will have a car with an engine bay that looks like this... so frigging awesome looking!!





Old 01-14-2013, 12:10 PM
  #22  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Thing with the early intakes is do you want to have a "look", or do you want to take advantage of what we've learned in the past, oh, 25 years?

Sure, I've got some 46's to drop onto the top of the Ruby engine when I get to that point. They've been sitting on the shelf for a decade or more, and cost me next to nothing. But I'm not expecting a better running engine, with more power output than what can be done with an electronically managed induction. (See: Gamroth's system with individual throttle bodies topped with a plenum.)

And I won't even get into (lack of) fuel economy, or choking-on-hydrocarbons aspects of carbs or MFI.
Old 01-14-2013, 01:49 PM
  #23  
Wachuko
Professor of Pending Projects
Rennlist Member
 
Wachuko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,891
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Cool

I have to admit, I just want the clean looks... but that is just me. I want a car with the least amount of crap in the engine bay.

But I have seen some different combinations of the looks with the modern engine controls... like this one:



Originally Posted by race911
Thing with the early intakes is do you want to have a "look", or do you want to take advantage of what we've learned in the past, oh, 25 years?

Sure, I've got some 46's to drop onto the top of the Ruby engine when I get to that point. They've been sitting on the shelf for a decade or more, and cost me next to nothing. But I'm not expecting a better running engine, with more power output than what can be done with an electronically managed induction. (See: Gamroth's system with individual throttle bodies topped with a plenum.)

And I won't even get into (lack of) fuel economy, or choking-on-hydrocarbons aspects of carbs or MFI.
Old 01-14-2013, 02:53 PM
  #24  
Reiver
Drifting
 
Reiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,526
Received 115 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I like the clean bay too but would stick with FI throttle bodies. Quick fuel economy and importantly, not having carb fuel washdown will add longevity to your engine.
Old 01-14-2013, 05:28 PM
  #25  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I think this is either a scam, or it will serve as a selling point later. "I had it listed on ebay for $100,000.00, but for you, I'll let it go for half that, 'cause I like you so much."

No?
Old 01-20-2013, 12:34 AM
  #26  
skl
Official Wednesday AM Red Bull F1 test driver
Rennlist Member
 
skl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 10,027
Received 964 Likes on 588 Posts
Default

Sort of like a "cheap" Singer...
Old 01-20-2013, 12:51 AM
  #27  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skl
Sort of like a "cheap" Singer...
You need to look closer:

Old 01-20-2013, 01:24 PM
  #28  
skl
Official Wednesday AM Red Bull F1 test driver
Rennlist Member
 
skl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 10,027
Received 964 Likes on 588 Posts
Default

I know, I saw that video, the Singer is in a class by itself, was sort of tongue in cheek.

A 911 for Carrera GT money is definitely in a class by itself!



Quick Reply: Really? 84 3.2 car backdated to 911 ST worth >$100k?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:16 PM.