1977 911T vs 1984 911 Carrera vs 2003 BMW M3
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
1977 911T vs 1984 911 Carrera vs 2003 BMW M3
Having an urge to spend money I don't really have. Of the three cars above, which one do you think you would get and for how much?
I'm looking for practical, rentention in value and minimal maintenance (though I know all three will require maintenance, so relative).
2003 BMW M3 would be the most practical as it is newer and for transporting kids and groceries. Also less "attention grabbing".
However, really like another Porsche. Call me lazy... Is there someone who can give me a quick comparison (pro and con) between the 1977 and 1984? Or a link they have handy?
Thanks
I'm looking for practical, rentention in value and minimal maintenance (though I know all three will require maintenance, so relative).
2003 BMW M3 would be the most practical as it is newer and for transporting kids and groceries. Also less "attention grabbing".
However, really like another Porsche. Call me lazy... Is there someone who can give me a quick comparison (pro and con) between the 1977 and 1984? Or a link they have handy?
Thanks
#2
Burning Brakes
Admirable choices.
I have an '84 Carrera and an '00 M5. I really enjoy owning and driving my 911 (Porsche #6 of 7 owned) but my M5 has been my daily driver for the last 10 years. It's fast, has great brakes, comfortable, and stealthily hauls my family of five. It draws no attention except for the minimalized exhaust system - my 930-driving neighbor says the M5 sounds like German NASCAR. I get 19mpg and it's been inexpensive so far to run. If I ever have to replace it, I would get a V8 M3 or a modern Carrera 4S.
An '03 M3 would be good a great car, but BMW had suspended making four-doors back then, didn't they? Plus you could probably get an M5 of the same vintage for roughly the same money.
I have an '84 Carrera and an '00 M5. I really enjoy owning and driving my 911 (Porsche #6 of 7 owned) but my M5 has been my daily driver for the last 10 years. It's fast, has great brakes, comfortable, and stealthily hauls my family of five. It draws no attention except for the minimalized exhaust system - my 930-driving neighbor says the M5 sounds like German NASCAR. I get 19mpg and it's been inexpensive so far to run. If I ever have to replace it, I would get a V8 M3 or a modern Carrera 4S.
An '03 M3 would be good a great car, but BMW had suspended making four-doors back then, didn't they? Plus you could probably get an M5 of the same vintage for roughly the same money.
#3
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
This is a valuable reference that will help you.
The Used 911 Story, by Peter Zimmermann
http://www.amazon.com/Used-911-Story...7532882&sr=8-1
The Used 911 Story, by Peter Zimmermann
http://www.amazon.com/Used-911-Story...7532882&sr=8-1
#4
I haddah Google dat
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I drove the 78 'SC for a few months while I worked on my '84. Huge, huge difference in feel. Way more torque in the 3.2. The '84 is much faster, accelerates smoother, and more civil around town and on the freeway it pulls away from traffic better than the 78.
#5
Race Car
Do you mean a 77 turbo, or Targa? No comparison between either 77 and an 84. Well there is a ton of comparisons to be made, but for your purposes the 84 is a MUCH better choice. M3 is a neat little car, but there are tons of neat little cars...maybe a Hyundai Genisis turbo.
have you looked at any Boxster "S"s ?
have you looked at any Boxster "S"s ?
#7
I haddah Google dat
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
hahaha, Muss you have a Turbo, you cheater!!!
I guess I don't understand the premise of comparing a 3.2 with a 4 door seater. I'm assuming we're not talking M3 sedan here.
Edit: I should clarify that there is also a huge difference between an early vs. late SC in the North American market. The compression was bumped, and lamda control added, as well as the air pump was eliminated. The compression increase along with the already high flowing heads made a big difference in torque, fuel mileage, and drivability. Not much difference between say an '83 and '84.
I guess I don't understand the premise of comparing a 3.2 with a 4 door seater. I'm assuming we're not talking M3 sedan here.
Edit: I should clarify that there is also a huge difference between an early vs. late SC in the North American market. The compression was bumped, and lamda control added, as well as the air pump was eliminated. The compression increase along with the already high flowing heads made a big difference in torque, fuel mileage, and drivability. Not much difference between say an '83 and '84.
Trending Topics
#8
uninformed gas bag
(contemplating on whether gas bag is one or two words)
Rennlist Member
(contemplating on whether gas bag is one or two words)
Rennlist Member
hahaha, Muss you have a Turbo, you cheater!!!
I guess I don't understand the premise of comparing a 3.2 with a 4 door seater. I'm assuming we're not talking M3 sedan here.
Edit: I should clarify that there is also a huge difference between an early vs. late SC in the North American market. The compression was bumped, and lamda control added, as well as the air pump was eliminated. The compression increase along with the already high flowing heads made a big difference in torque, fuel mileage, and drivability. Not much difference between say an '83 and '84.
I guess I don't understand the premise of comparing a 3.2 with a 4 door seater. I'm assuming we're not talking M3 sedan here.
Edit: I should clarify that there is also a huge difference between an early vs. late SC in the North American market. The compression was bumped, and lamda control added, as well as the air pump was eliminated. The compression increase along with the already high flowing heads made a big difference in torque, fuel mileage, and drivability. Not much difference between say an '83 and '84.
#9
Race Car
huge difference in the choices. i think it depends on what you're looking for in an 'extra' car. Just my 2 cents:
fun, quick, (relatively) impractical car with good resale value.....911.
fast, practical, modern car with average resale value and a lack of soul (compared to air cooled 911)....M3 (i've had several E36 M3s so I don't think i'm biased against them)
fun, quick, (relatively) impractical car with good resale value.....911.
fast, practical, modern car with average resale value and a lack of soul (compared to air cooled 911)....M3 (i've had several E36 M3s so I don't think i'm biased against them)
#10
Rennlist Member
Not to be a jerk, but this is a silly question to ask.
1. None of us know what floats your boat when behind the wheel.
2. The M3 may be more "dependable" but when it breaks, it will get expensive. Probably not DIY friendly.
3. Either of the Porsches are easy to work on, the '84 being more bulletproof.
4. My '84 is faster than my '95.
5. Save your money for gasoline and higher taxes.
1. None of us know what floats your boat when behind the wheel.
2. The M3 may be more "dependable" but when it breaks, it will get expensive. Probably not DIY friendly.
3. Either of the Porsches are easy to work on, the '84 being more bulletproof.
4. My '84 is faster than my '95.
5. Save your money for gasoline and higher taxes.
#11
Instructor
Thread Starter
Not to be a jerk, but this is a silly question to ask.
1. None of us know what floats your boat when behind the wheel.
2. The M3 may be more "dependable" but when it breaks, it will get expensive. Probably not DIY friendly.
3. Either of the Porsches are easy to work on, the '84 being more bulletproof.
4. My '84 is faster than my '95.
5. Save your money for gasoline and higher taxes.
1. None of us know what floats your boat when behind the wheel.
2. The M3 may be more "dependable" but when it breaks, it will get expensive. Probably not DIY friendly.
3. Either of the Porsches are easy to work on, the '84 being more bulletproof.
4. My '84 is faster than my '95.
5. Save your money for gasoline and higher taxes.
I know it is a silly question to ask but have been thinking about it for awhile and can't decide. It's like a kid in a candy store and can't figure out what candy to choose, just want everything.
Initially, I was looking at the M3 coupe as a DD in the summer and good winter days, have the 996 C4 Cab for summer fun and a Honda Odyessy for winter snow. I am not handy with DIY so maintenance will cost anyways.
With the 77 targa, I believe the cost of purchase will be the lowest of the three, but not sure if I will drive it in the winter but they look very nice. You know the Porsche commercials about a little kid wanting a Porsche, much like that with the 77. However, I think I prefer a coupe to a targa.
So a 1984 Carrera gets spotted and looks great too for a little more money, will I drive this as a DD, maybe not... Back to the M3?
What floats my boat? I haven't really driven a M3 yet, but my dream car has always been the Porsche. It's only a car, drive it philosophy is true but sometimes if you are too attach to something it pains to see it harmed by the "elements", such as other humans, yourself and nature. I'm sure a lot can relate and therefore the debate of driving the most you can out of a car and enjoy or preserve and treat it as a luxury on the times you drive it.
I am also considering a 912 but then I'll have two toys and will drive a van most days.
Thanks for listening... Decisions decisions
Maybe, pick #5 save money for gas and taxes!!
#12
Race Car
just a comment on the "DIY friendliness" of the M3. The only reason that applies is because of the complex nature of multiple computerized systems. However, it still needs all the usual maintenance including fluid changes, brake pad changes, and valve adjustments (which are quite a bit easier to access than an air cooled 911.)
IMHO if you're not one to get your hands greasy, a more modern M3 if well maintained should have less maintenance issues for a longer period of time than an older air cooled 911
IMHO if you're not one to get your hands greasy, a more modern M3 if well maintained should have less maintenance issues for a longer period of time than an older air cooled 911
#13
Rennlist Member
#14
Race Car
yes, E46 has even more computer systems than the E36 from my understanding.
that is the nice thing about my 78 SC.....electrically and mechanically it's fairly simple
that is the nice thing about my 78 SC.....electrically and mechanically it's fairly simple
#15
Race Director
4. And how much have you spent on modifications for the 84? I believe just the motors alone were nearly $20k, right?
The M3 is a much more modern car with performance that far exceeds either p-car. Its simply a question of how much performance you are willing to give up for the soul, look, and feel of the porsche. Given that the first thing he mentioned was practicality, I question if a 25 to 30 year old porsche is the way to go.