Turbo Evolution. Nice Comp Chart
#3
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Very cool...thank you! Observation....the 930 gained 300 lbs from 1975 to 1978...bigger motor, intercooler...what else? Cats? That is a lot of weight!! Also we should have a foot note for 2010...no more drysump! ![nono](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/nono.gif)
![nono](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/nono.gif)
![crying](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bigcry.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
#11
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seat of the pants dyno usually gives every additional gear the equivalant of 100hp. 5 speed came in 89. The 3.6 964 is a beast. The 993 cars are simply amazing. Much more fun than the 996+ in driver satisfaction IMHO. I built(and rebuilt)/crewed a 92 in IMSA and it could push 450hp in "stock" form. Superb sports car for sure.
#12
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interestingly the 1996 car is only a little over 150 lbs lighter than the current car. This shows that Porsche (despite the popular opinion) has been doing a good job on the weight management side of things, as the current car is fundamentally larger to boot.
Each one of them is an outstanding car with advantages/disadvantages relative to the others.
I also have high hopes for the new 9A1 motors. I understand that these motors have been subject to the largest amount of pre-introduction development of any Porsche motor yet. I just may be that the "integrated dry sump" approach may have come of age.
Each one of them is an outstanding car with advantages/disadvantages relative to the others.
I also have high hopes for the new 9A1 motors. I understand that these motors have been subject to the largest amount of pre-introduction development of any Porsche motor yet. I just may be that the "integrated dry sump" approach may have come of age.