Panamera
#16
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
....purebreed needs to be defined? Next time you look at Ruby's deep crystal eyes tell me what you see? PUREBREED...there, I said it...P U R E B R E E D!!!
Doesn't get any simpler than that.
I doubt it if someone 20 years from now will be looking at the panasomething and evoke the same feelings when they look at those plastic catarac hazy opaque worn out lenses. Come to think of it...doubt if anyone will be keeping those panasomething that loong nor spend money restoring one.
abe
Doesn't get any simpler than that.
I doubt it if someone 20 years from now will be looking at the panasomething and evoke the same feelings when they look at those plastic catarac hazy opaque worn out lenses. Come to think of it...doubt if anyone will be keeping those panasomething that loong nor spend money restoring one.
abe
#17
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The point I was trying to make is that anything Porsche makes today is a very distant relative of a pre-89 911. It's a fact of life. The Panamera is just another model in the stable.
#19
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
....purebreed needs to be defined? Next time you look at Ruby's deep crystal eyes tell me what you see? PUREBREED...there, I said it...P U R E B R E E D!!!
Doesn't get any simpler than that.
I doubt it if someone 20 years from now will be looking at the panasomething and evoke the same feelings when they look at those plastic catarac hazy opaque worn out lenses. Come to think of it...doubt if anyone will be keeping those panasomething that loong nor spend money restoring one.
abe
Doesn't get any simpler than that.
I doubt it if someone 20 years from now will be looking at the panasomething and evoke the same feelings when they look at those plastic catarac hazy opaque worn out lenses. Come to think of it...doubt if anyone will be keeping those panasomething that loong nor spend money restoring one.
abe
#23
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The Pano's *** is simply ugly. They did not get it right. The Austin Martin Rapide is a 4 door that actually looks great. Common Porsche!
#24
Instructor
Join Date: May 2009
Location: By the Bay, Maryland
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'd buy one in a second if a $100,000 fell off of the tree in my backyard. Unfortuately, all the leaves have fallen and there is no money out there. I check everyday. You all are going to have me for this but I am looking at a used VW Phaeton as my alternate family car. We (the mrs.) drive a Volvo XC70 which she loves. I get the VW.
#25
Advanced
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Killingworth Ct
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wow..I just saw the Pano at a PCA 50th anniversary in Ct this past week end. Many have commented it looks better in person. My opinion is it looks better in photos. While the interior is spectacular the car looks bulbous and like a squished version of the Cayenne. Just my 2 cents. I certainly wouldn't entertain buying one.......however I would imagine the ride is very nice. I guess it depends on personal needs. With a grown family I now favor 2 seaters vs. larger vehicles.