Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which is more fun?
Keep the GT3. You'll grow into it.
43.75%
Get a slower, track only car and drive it at the limit.
56.25%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

Which would be more fun? GT3 or Boxster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2010 | 05:15 PM
  #1  
kush07's Avatar
kush07
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default Which would be more fun? GT3 or Boxster?

I currently have a GT3 which is seeing more and more track time, and almost no street time. It's lead me to consider getting a full on track car.

I've spoken with some (thanks Teamdrugmoney) about the move. I'm an intermediate driver. My skills are advancing to the point where I'm going faster (cornering speeds) while feeling like the car is much more settled than ever.

I feel the GT3 is an unbelievable platform whose capabilities are significantly beyond my reach. The horsepower is a thrill, a curse, and a crutch. An F spec boxster (or miata etc) will also be considerably faster than I am in the right hands (like most on this board I'm sure) but I will certainly get to the limits faster than the GT3.

In the interest of becoming a better driver and having more fun, do you guys think I'm better off staying in my current car (maybe do some suspension, diff work), or slow down to go fast? Is it more fun to drive on the edge of a slower car, or grow into a faster car and perhaps never really reach its limits. (Let's face it, most GT3 drivers are nowhere near the limit)

Being election season, how about a poll?

Thanks for your input/advice.

Last edited by kush07; 11-01-2010 at 06:35 PM.
Old 11-01-2010 | 05:40 PM
  #2  
Gary R.'s Avatar
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,603
Likes: 292
From: Valencia, Spain
Default

I would stay with a rear engine and of course air-cooled will give you the best "raw" experience along with the same dry sump block as your GT3. My 2500lb/190HP car is capable of a sub 1:01 at Limerock, a 3.2 Carerra a hair faster, a 964 3.6 around 1:00. It's all about the driver, make me an offer to save me winter storage!

You are risking a $100K car now, much more relaxed pushing a $30K car to it's limit (and most likely be as fast (overall) as you are now!
Old 11-01-2010 | 05:54 PM
  #3  
multi21's Avatar
multi21
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,306
Likes: 3,610
Default

my .02 cents from a gt3 owner. If you can't afford to leave the GT3 at the track, then don't track it. A dedicated track car is probably your best bet.
Old 11-01-2010 | 06:18 PM
  #4  
Potomac-Greg's Avatar
Potomac-Greg
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
From: Suburban DC
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
my .02 cents from a gt3 owner. If you can't afford to leave the GT3 at the track, then don't track it. A dedicated track car is probably your best bet.
2nd.

Of course, once you have a dedicated track car, the GT3 will not see much track time, and you will wonder why you would want a GT3 for street use. You'll find yourself looking at Panamera ads. I used to wonder how jet pilots drove such ordinary cars. It's because they fly jets!

It's a progressive disease.
Old 11-01-2010 | 06:22 PM
  #5  
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 41,907
Likes: 1,753
From: All Ate Up With Motor
Default

You have to ask yourself, which is bettter for waving at bitchez: a baller car like the GT3 or driving flat out in the Boxster?









Professional Racing and Driving Coach
Old 11-01-2010 | 06:51 PM
  #6  
TeamDrugMoney's Avatar
TeamDrugMoney
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
From: Trying to be the driver my car wants me to be
Default

I'll be interested to see where you land on all this. We'll have to chat more at VIR this weekend at the NNJR event! Until then...
Old 11-01-2010 | 07:00 PM
  #7  
mark kibort's Avatar
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 29,958
Likes: 185
From: saratoga, ca
Default

Get a 928 race car. just as fast, and cheeeep!!!

Just kidding. actually, the lower powered cheaper car is often the smarter way to go, especially if you are "attached" in anyway to the GT3, especially financially. Certainly, its a smart way to go for class racing or to be able to compare your performance to others. However, as far as most fun, that has to absolutely go to the GT3. Its the kind of speed that is intoxicating. the lower powered car, although also fun, just dont have that monster power that the GT3 would have. For me, that is most of the fun. I just want to go as fast as I can afford, and no slower.
Old 11-01-2010 | 07:14 PM
  #8  
race911's Avatar
race911
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,312
Likes: 9
From: Roseville, CA
Default

I recommend at least getting some seat time in a formula car or sports racer. Your perception about what fast is will never be the same.
Old 11-01-2010 | 07:19 PM
  #9  
himself's Avatar
himself
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by kush07
Is it more fun to drive on the edge of a slower car, or grow into a faster car and perhaps never really reach its limits. (Let's face it, most GT3 drivers are nowhere near the limit)

Being election season, how about a poll?

Thanks for your input/advice.
You need a core set of skills to drive either car at the limit. If you are way under the GT3, you will still be way under the Boxster. You can't just switch to a "slower" platform and assume you will have new skills that never existed before. You will have to grow into either car.

IMO, the idea of "fun" to drive is another way of saying how rewarding it is to drive a car at the limit. Personally, I get the same level of "fun" out of driving my GT3 as I do driving a spec miata or any other car. Pushing the envelope in the platform is what it's all about. At some point, it simply comes down to what car you want (can afford) to drive. Taking the racing with your buddies element out of the equation, you can have the same amount of "fun" in any car if you are on the edge a whole session. For others, this isn't the case. And they drive cup cars lol.

-td
Old 11-01-2010 | 07:36 PM
  #10  
jrgordonsenior's Avatar
jrgordonsenior
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,306
Likes: 7
From: Vacuuming Cal Speedway
Default

I raced a 993TT for 2 years, a GT3 Cup for 4 years, then a Spec Box for 1-1/2years, and now my 3.4 996 (mini cup). There is so much to be learned from a slower platform and remarkably you'll have the time to learn it since your're going so slow. Seriously, you can set up your braking, turn-in, and track out points and actually have the time to concentrate on hitting them. I found with the faster cars everything happened too quickly and I wasn't learning as much as correcting and trying again (and again, and again). When I slowed it down with the Spec Box I learned more than ever before and found I was able to apply those skills. It didn't take long for me to miss more power, but I chose to go 1 step at a time and the 3.4 996 has been another great learning tool. Now I beat 6 and 7 cups regularily with drivers who should have taken the learning steps I wish I had taken many years ago. Never too late and there's always fast cars available when you're ready. Oh and there's no substiute for competent coaching no matter how great you think you are ....
Old 11-01-2010 | 08:44 PM
  #11  
Larry Herman's Avatar
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 2
From: Columbus, NJ
Default

I used to race a Carrera, took a hiatus, and then sold it to get a GT3 for DEs. After a couple of years the bug to race again took over & I sold the GT3 for a Boxster and an RSA racecar. Best thing that I ever did. The Boxster was (and still is) much more fun on the street than the GT3 ever was, and the RSA as a dedicated racecar was almost fast, and much, much safer than the GT3. You don't have to make any compromises for safety in a racecar.

Had to sell the RSA but if I get a chance I will get another GT3, but it will be a for track use (i.e. racing) only.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car

CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.

Old 11-01-2010 | 09:02 PM
  #12  
multi21's Avatar
multi21
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,306
Likes: 3,610
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Herman
I used to race a Carrera, took a hiatus, and then sold it to get a GT3 for DEs. After a couple of years the bug to race again took over & I sold the GT3 for a Boxster and an RSA racecar. Best thing that I ever did. The Boxster was (and still is) much more fun on the street than the GT3 ever was, and the RSA as a dedicated racecar was almost fast, and much, much safer than the GT3. You don't have to make any compromises for safety in a racecar.

Had to sell the RSA but if I get a chance I will get another GT3, but it will be a for track use (i.e. racing) only.
Why?
Old 11-01-2010 | 09:40 PM
  #13  
WHB Porsche's Avatar
WHB Porsche
I'm Still Jenny
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,200
Likes: 2
From: New England
Default

Let's just put it this way - my avatar used to be a picture of me driving a 993TT. Now it's me in a SM. Which do you think I enjoy more?
Old 11-01-2010 | 09:44 PM
  #14  
VaSteve's Avatar
VaSteve
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Default

I went out with a fellow in our region in his GT-3 RS and he was turning 1:21s with me in the car (did a 1:18 at some point) on Summit Point main over the weekend in the black group. We were lapping the guys I usually work to keep up with in my 944S2. It was a fun ride, and now I understand why he runs through a set of tires 2 events. I suppose you need to factor in the cost of consumables as well with a much faster car. I fortunately get a lot of use out of my brakes and tires....my slow car is good balance for me of fun/lifecycle of the parts.
Old 11-01-2010 | 09:56 PM
  #15  
U4EEAH's Avatar
U4EEAH
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Short memory, Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
I would stay with a rear engine and of course air-cooled will give you the best "raw" experience along with the same dry sump block as your GT3. My 2500lb/190HP car is capable of a sub 1:01 at Limerock, a 3.2 Carerra a hair faster, a 964 3.6 around 1:00. It's all about the driver, make me an offer to save me winter storage!

You are risking a $100K car now, much more relaxed pushing a $30K car to it's limit (and most likely be as fast (overall) as you are now!
SPOT ON. A slower car will "talk to you", and help you develop feel and reflexes for its dynamics at speeds that won't terrify or kill you. A rear engine, more so. You can go as fast as you might be comfortable with in a GT3 without ever developing the finer points and skills.


Quick Reply: Which would be more fun? GT3 or Boxster?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:58 AM.