Mind those air filters
The following 5 users liked this post by 85Gold:
maschinetheist (03-20-2024),
MrFunk (03-20-2024),
neteng101 (03-20-2024),
slilley (03-21-2024),
UncleDude (03-20-2024)
Popular Reply
03-20-2024, 06:31 PM
Burning Brakes
My post was the second post, so there wasn’t much to review. He didn’t indicate the model, I didn’t see it, so I asked — especially since he said he has multiple “cars” in the post. I own 3 Porsches; nobody has any way of knowing which car I’m talking about based on a picture of a used air filter or a single model name in my signature. Sorry I asked. Will unsubscribe now.
#2
Burning Brakes
What model is the vehicle?
#5
10 track days will do that. Remember your engine wear isn't about miles, it about how many revolutions it has made. Running 10 track days at a consistent 5000-8000 rpm sucks a lot of fuel and a lot of corresponding air. When you are on track with other cars that are spewing a ton of exhaust, it will also get sucked in. Just saying. Gotta pay to play!!
On a different, but somewhat related note, this is the same logic for engine break-in debates. An engine run at 4000 rpms will require 1500 miles for the same break-in as one run at 3000 rpm for 2000 miles. That's why the whole idea that break-in should be based on miles makes no scientific sense.
On a different, but somewhat related note, this is the same logic for engine break-in debates. An engine run at 4000 rpms will require 1500 miles for the same break-in as one run at 3000 rpm for 2000 miles. That's why the whole idea that break-in should be based on miles makes no scientific sense.
Last edited by VVG; 03-20-2024 at 05:50 PM.
The following users liked this post:
pro1200 (03-21-2024)
#6
On a different, but somewhat related note, this is the same logic for engine break-in debates. An engine run at 4000 rpms will require 1500 miles for the same break-in as one run at 3000 rpm for 2000 miles. That's why the whole idea that break-in should be based on miles makes no scientific sense.
I prefer gradually higher RPMs during break-in, which makes sense as most of the initial wear-in will occur very early on. Going from 4000 rpm limit at 1990 miles to redline at 2001 miles, what's the difference really?
Last edited by neteng101; 03-20-2024 at 06:07 PM.
#7
Burning Brakes
The following 8 users liked this post by 348SStb:
Acropora8 (03-22-2024),
Alpha Ice (03-20-2024),
BlazinPond (03-20-2024),
jimdillard (03-21-2024),
Juggy (03-20-2024),
and 3 others liked this post.
Trending Topics
#8
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Reviewing posts/threads also give you background.
#9
Burning Brakes
My post was the second post, so there wasn’t much to review. He didn’t indicate the model, I didn’t see it, so I asked — especially since he said he has multiple “cars” in the post. I own 3 Porsches; nobody has any way of knowing which car I’m talking about based on a picture of a used air filter or a single model name in my signature. Sorry I asked. Will unsubscribe now.
Last edited by 348SStb; 03-20-2024 at 06:33 PM.
The following 12 users liked this post by 348SStb:
7184RS (03-20-2024),
Bahman (03-21-2024),
BlazinPond (03-20-2024),
Cam07 (04-08-2024),
Dem bones (03-20-2024),
and 7 others liked this post.
#10
Is the OE maintenance interval every 40k/4 years? Yours look properly dirty! I wish these were easily accessible for visual inspection - a downside of a mid-engine config.
I clean my intake filter on my supercharged Audi probably every 2 years (~8k miles) and its never as dirty as yours... guessing the side intakes ingest more thrown up debris vs a conventional front engine intake?
I clean my intake filter on my supercharged Audi probably every 2 years (~8k miles) and its never as dirty as yours... guessing the side intakes ingest more thrown up debris vs a conventional front engine intake?
The following users liked this post:
matt0520 (03-20-2024)
#11
Yep, I have had exactly the same thing with mine. The log book maintenance interval is completely inappropriate if you track your car. They need to be replaced every 5000km.
#12
Rennlist Member
~5000 miles on my first set of BMC filters. Absolutely no reason that I can think of to not use BMC’s, especially since most RS models ship with these as OEM.
Now that I have two sets, swap out every 5K miles, or sooner pending usage. Clean one set, replace the other, rinse and repeat.
The image shows the new filer and used - keep in mind, that my car saw a decent amount of daily driving, and Im not talking only sunny days. Replaced about two weeks ago.
Now that I have two sets, swap out every 5K miles, or sooner pending usage. Clean one set, replace the other, rinse and repeat.
The image shows the new filer and used - keep in mind, that my car saw a decent amount of daily driving, and Im not talking only sunny days. Replaced about two weeks ago.
Last edited by BoxKing; 03-20-2024 at 08:23 PM.
The following 6 users liked this post by BoxKing:
BBermann (03-20-2024),
BlazinPond (03-20-2024),
jimdillard (03-21-2024),
Larry Cable (03-21-2024),
matt0520 (03-21-2024),
and 1 others liked this post.
The following 2 users liked this post by m3bs:
85Gold (03-21-2024),
jimdillard (03-21-2024)
#14
Instructor
I replace mine every year regardless of track time (but definitely do them). Every 10k miles. Those cars need to breathe! Cheap consumable
The following 2 users liked this post by maschinetheist:
Larry Cable (03-21-2024),
mprog (03-24-2024)
#15
Same reason I didn't do BMC filters. I'd love to see an oil analysis comparing silica levels with the standard filters to those with the BMC filters over the same mileage/use case. Other oiled cotton gauze air filter tests show evidence of elevated silica in the oil from less than adequate filtration allowing dirt into the engine.
Do the RS models that include BMC filters as OEM have the same induction system as low on the vehicle? Perhaps the 4RS intakes in the rear window area get cleaner airflow that doesn't pick up as much dust and debris as the standard GT4 ducts.
Just a thought.
Do the RS models that include BMC filters as OEM have the same induction system as low on the vehicle? Perhaps the 4RS intakes in the rear window area get cleaner airflow that doesn't pick up as much dust and debris as the standard GT4 ducts.
Just a thought.
The following users liked this post:
85Gold (03-21-2024)