Power - how much is enough?
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Power - how much is enough?
Took the mean green machine for a spin yesterday, and was once again impressed with the grunt this car has. That 414 HP will flat out getty-up. Like most here, I lust after an RS variant, with the extra (approx 80) HP and 9k redline, but is that really "needed?" As a 4rs owner pointed out, a gt4 / spyder / gts, you can usually mash the accelerator and although it can squirm (especially if on uneven surface or in a corner), it usually stays reasonably hooked up. 4rs power, however, needs to be more carefully administered, as it can and will bite you more readily (even though it is hardly a torque monster, like the turbo engines out there). These are hardly momentum cars, by any stretch, and will already circle most tracks at a seriously impressive pace.
So, how much power is enough? Is the 4L we have in our cars the "sweet spot" for power? Ample, but not dangerous / extreme? Good for both street and track?
(Yes, I know this is personal preference, but has practical aspects, so worth a chat, IMO).
So, how much power is enough? Is the 4L we have in our cars the "sweet spot" for power? Ample, but not dangerous / extreme? Good for both street and track?
(Yes, I know this is personal preference, but has practical aspects, so worth a chat, IMO).
The following users liked this post:
E Fariab (12-22-2022)
Popular Reply
12-19-2022, 12:57 PM
Rennlist Member
"" If you can leave two black stripes from the exit of one corner to the braking zone of the next, you have enough horsepower.
Mark Donohue ""
Peter
Mark Donohue ""
Peter
#2
Rennlist Member
"" If you can leave two black stripes from the exit of one corner to the braking zone of the next, you have enough horsepower.
Mark Donohue ""
Peter
Mark Donohue ""
Peter
The following 15 users liked this post by 85Gold:
BIG SURPRISE (12-19-2022),
Clark_Kent (12-19-2022),
Dr.Bill (12-19-2022),
enduro (12-19-2022),
Frank Torres (12-20-2022),
and 10 others liked this post.
#3
Rennlist Member
If you're good, your good. Having driven someone's 4.5L, and gone back to driving my own, "I'm not good". As always, YMMV.
Full disclosure, I'm still in a 981, but if it accelerated like it does in sub-55F like it has been the past few weeks, all year round, I'd be good.
Full disclosure, I'm still in a 981, but if it accelerated like it does in sub-55F like it has been the past few weeks, all year round, I'd be good.
#4
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. It'll also eat tires and possibly kill you. Or at least get your license revoked. lol
I had a 996tt in a former life, so I am familiar with significant torque, but that is "handled" by AWD, and so a very different experience.
I had a 996tt in a former life, so I am familiar with significant torque, but that is "handled" by AWD, and so a very different experience.
#5
Drifting
I think for me its all about power delivery. My last two cars are a very good example of this. Had the A91 Supra with 389hp (but many Dyno's have shown that the car actually makes closer to 450) and an M2 Competition with 410 hp.
The Supra was faster hands down, but the way it delivered the power was significantly smoother and more linear. The M2 Competition just kicked you right in the *** from the getgo and required a significant amount of Throttle and Clutch work in order for it to be smooth.
I Personally preferred the Supra. But the car i preferred over both was my stock engine Honda S2000.
The Supra was faster hands down, but the way it delivered the power was significantly smoother and more linear. The M2 Competition just kicked you right in the *** from the getgo and required a significant amount of Throttle and Clutch work in order for it to be smooth.
I Personally preferred the Supra. But the car i preferred over both was my stock engine Honda S2000.
#6
Rennlist Member
The S2000 makes a fun track car.
#8
Burning Brakes
I've owned, and driven, a lot of cars with a LOT more horsepower. I think the Spyder/GT4 is "enough" - and generally due to the tall gearing. IMO it could get by with less if it had shorter ratios - IMO the old 3.4L 9A1 flat six might've been "enough" with proper ratios (my old 987.2 with a tune and Fabspeed race headers was IMO perfect - it did not have the long long legs of the 981/718 gearing).
I've generally found that, with more power than we have, it becomes difficult to put the power down unless you're already moving. I don't want to have to wait until 60-70mph to be able to go WOT and get the shoved in the back. I want to squirt around town. Pull out of a parking lot, hit it and rip up to 60 before slowing down for the 50mph speed limit.
That and, I want it to last a while so I can enjoy it. I've driven a few Teslas (including a Plaid), a few Taycans (including a Turbo S), a few Audi models including a recent RS7. Stupid, stupid fast... which, yes, it's fun... BUT in a practical, realistic sense, if you're already rolling a bit in traffic, and go WOT because "why not"... In the blink of an eye and before you really even get to savor the sense of acceleration you're at 100+ mph and it's "**** I better slow down."
I've generally found that, with more power than we have, it becomes difficult to put the power down unless you're already moving. I don't want to have to wait until 60-70mph to be able to go WOT and get the shoved in the back. I want to squirt around town. Pull out of a parking lot, hit it and rip up to 60 before slowing down for the 50mph speed limit.
That and, I want it to last a while so I can enjoy it. I've driven a few Teslas (including a Plaid), a few Taycans (including a Turbo S), a few Audi models including a recent RS7. Stupid, stupid fast... which, yes, it's fun... BUT in a practical, realistic sense, if you're already rolling a bit in traffic, and go WOT because "why not"... In the blink of an eye and before you really even get to savor the sense of acceleration you're at 100+ mph and it's "**** I better slow down."
#9
Racer
I have it on good authority that 1.21 gigawatts should be sufficient to really get one flying...
Perhaps the corollary question is more important: "How much mass (weight) is too much?"
Perhaps the corollary question is more important: "How much mass (weight) is too much?"
The following users liked this post:
icon (12-20-2022)
#10
Rennlist Member
You do get used to the power, that said I still find it exciting. The correct noise helps the experience to IMO.
The following users liked this post:
Bearrun21 (12-21-2022)
#11
Pro
Philosophically speaking if you have a place to use the power in a sane way there is no limit until the laws of physics call the game off. I live in a rural area with good roads nice straight-a-ways, etc. To be honest I have never taken my GTS past 6000 RPM simply because after 3 upshifts at 6000 I am looking at going to jail if a law officer sees me before I see them. Obviously on the track in a controlled environment you can blow your socks off ASSUMING that you have the instruction and experience to control the car in the situations you and the power available can get yourself into and your risk tolerance for damaging the car,
Straight line speed and acceleration are nice but there are only so many places that you can use them in a reasonable manner.
As an aside I used to fly Lear Jets once above FAA mandated speed limit altitudes, we flight planned at 440 knots which works out to 506 MPH or 8.4 miles per minute, but you had less sensation of speed than in the GTS at 90MPH
Straight line speed and acceleration are nice but there are only so many places that you can use them in a reasonable manner.
As an aside I used to fly Lear Jets once above FAA mandated speed limit altitudes, we flight planned at 440 knots which works out to 506 MPH or 8.4 miles per minute, but you had less sensation of speed than in the GTS at 90MPH
The following users liked this post:
mc3456 (12-22-2022)
#12
Racer
Philosophically speaking if you have a place to use the power in a sane way there is no limit until the laws of physics call the game off. I live in a rural area with good roads nice straight-a-ways, etc. To be honest I have never taken my GTS past 6000 RPM simply because after 3 upshifts at 6000 I am looking at going to jail if a law officer sees me before I see them. Obviously on the track in a controlled environment you can blow your socks off ASSUMING that you have the instruction and experience to control the car in the situations you and the power available can get yourself into and your risk tolerance for damaging the car,
Straight line speed and acceleration are nice but there are only so many places that you can use them in a reasonable manner.
As an aside I used to fly Lear Jets once above FAA mandated speed limit altitudes, we flight planned at 440 knots which works out to 506 MPH or 8.4 miles per minute, but you had less sensation of speed than in the GTS at 90MPH
Straight line speed and acceleration are nice but there are only so many places that you can use them in a reasonable manner.
As an aside I used to fly Lear Jets once above FAA mandated speed limit altitudes, we flight planned at 440 knots which works out to 506 MPH or 8.4 miles per minute, but you had less sensation of speed than in the GTS at 90MPH
The following 6 users liked this post by ausgang:
burnergt4 (12-20-2022),
Diamond Dave (12-20-2022),
kristob (12-19-2022),
mc3456 (12-22-2022),
patdonahue (12-19-2022),
and 1 others liked this post.
#13
I've owned, and driven, a lot of cars with a LOT more horsepower. I think the Spyder/GT4 is "enough" - and generally due to the tall gearing. IMO it could get by with less if it had shorter ratios - IMO the old 3.4L 9A1 flat six might've been "enough" with proper ratios (my old 987.2 with a tune and Fabspeed race headers was IMO perfect - it did not have the long long legs of the 981/718 gearing).
I've generally found that, with more power than we have, it becomes difficult to put the power down unless you're already moving. I don't want to have to wait until 60-70mph to be able to go WOT and get the shoved in the back. I want to squirt around town. Pull out of a parking lot, hit it and rip up to 60 before slowing down for the 50mph speed limit.
That and, I want it to last a while so I can enjoy it. I've driven a few Teslas (including a Plaid), a few Taycans (including a Turbo S), a few Audi models including a recent RS7. Stupid, stupid fast... which, yes, it's fun... BUT in a practical, realistic sense, if you're already rolling a bit in traffic, and go WOT because "why not"... In the blink of an eye and before you really even get to savor the sense of acceleration you're at 100+ mph and it's "**** I better slow down."
I've generally found that, with more power than we have, it becomes difficult to put the power down unless you're already moving. I don't want to have to wait until 60-70mph to be able to go WOT and get the shoved in the back. I want to squirt around town. Pull out of a parking lot, hit it and rip up to 60 before slowing down for the 50mph speed limit.
That and, I want it to last a while so I can enjoy it. I've driven a few Teslas (including a Plaid), a few Taycans (including a Turbo S), a few Audi models including a recent RS7. Stupid, stupid fast... which, yes, it's fun... BUT in a practical, realistic sense, if you're already rolling a bit in traffic, and go WOT because "why not"... In the blink of an eye and before you really even get to savor the sense of acceleration you're at 100+ mph and it's "**** I better slow down."
The following users liked this post:
daaa nope (12-20-2022)
#14
I bought this car because I decided ~450hp NA, 3200 lbs is a sweet spot for fun on the street and on the track, and because track consumables won't be absolutely insane.
The following users liked this post:
kwikit356 (12-19-2022)
#15
Burning Brakes
I think right now, my Spyder has enough power… it’s certainly fast enough.
Which is why I want to change the gears (soon, I hope), and make it more torquey.
I want my Spyder to feel faster, not go faster.
Which is why I want to change the gears (soon, I hope), and make it more torquey.
I want my Spyder to feel faster, not go faster.