New rear wing
#46
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mine are 19" 265/35/19 F and 305/30/19 R on Forgeline wheels. I have camber plates and toes links with -3.0 F and -2.5 R camber to provide clearance.
The following users liked this post:
IRM (01-28-2023)
#47
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nice, I run 265/305 also. It really works well. I got the Dundon 1600 wing towards the end of the season last year and haven't really messed with AOA. Going to try some different settings this year and see how it does.
#48
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Have been looking at it...
Cheers!!
#49
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I ran it at Road Atlanta and I was 2 seconds quicker. Lost 5 mph on the back straight, but I was running 10 degrees AOA. 7 would probably be more reasonable, but the car felt good and I was in the middle of a Time Trial so didn't want to change too much at the time.
#50
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Did you also add the Dundon dive planes??
Cheers!
#52
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Guess I'll pick up the dive planes next time Dundon has a sale. I need to attach my splitter and crank my AOA a little and see what it does for the GT4 on my track. (have DBJ 1600mm swan neck)
#53
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 265/305 set up on 19 inch wheels is the way go. More grip overall and shifted more to the front where it is needed. Then you don't need to be making major sway bar changes to fix the inherent under steer characteristics of the car. A softer front sway bar softens up the front and makes it less precise, while a harder rear bar makes the car less compliant off the corners. So being more in the M/M range on the bars is a better place to be. On 19 inch tires and wheels, you are also 9mm lower to the ground, which also improves downforce in both the front and rear of the car.
With more relative front grip from the 20mm wider tires, only 10mm in the rear, you can add more rear downforce with a wing and not be as susceptible to aero induced understeer. Of course adding the 4RS front aero guides with any major wing upgrade is a safe and logical upgrade.
Question: Aren't the DBJ and Dundon parts the same or nearly so?
With more relative front grip from the 20mm wider tires, only 10mm in the rear, you can add more rear downforce with a wing and not be as susceptible to aero induced understeer. Of course adding the 4RS front aero guides with any major wing upgrade is a safe and logical upgrade.
Question: Aren't the DBJ and Dundon parts the same or nearly so?
The following users liked this post:
alwaysdriving (01-29-2023)
#54
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yeah, don't know if you remember but you measured it for me, because I was going to get that one also, but they were sold out for ever so I went with the Dundon bolt on. Did you get the DBJ splitter? I've been looking at that also
#55
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 265/305 set up on 19 inch wheels is the way go. More grip overall and shifted more to the front where it is needed. Then you don't need to be making major sway bar changes to fix the inherent under steer characteristics of the car. A softer front sway bar softens up the front and makes it less precise, while a harder rear bar makes the car less compliant off the corners. So being more in the M/M range on the bars is a better place to be. On 19 inch tires and wheels, you are also 9mm lower to the ground, which also improves downforce in both the front and rear of the car.
With more relative front grip from the 20mm wider tires, only 10mm in the rear, you can add more rear downforce with a wing and not be as susceptible to aero induced understeer. Of course adding the 4RS front aero guides with any major wing upgrade is a safe and logical upgrade.
Question: Aren't the DBJ and Dundon parts the same or nearly so?
With more relative front grip from the 20mm wider tires, only 10mm in the rear, you can add more rear downforce with a wing and not be as susceptible to aero induced understeer. Of course adding the 4RS front aero guides with any major wing upgrade is a safe and logical upgrade.
Question: Aren't the DBJ and Dundon parts the same or nearly so?
If the built Miata engine doesn't show up soon, I'll be running them on the GT4 @ ECR in March. Will prob see you there.
#56
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting.
Looking forward to it.
Looking forward to it.
#57
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 265/305 set up on 19 inch wheels is the way go. More grip overall and shifted more to the front where it is needed. Then you don't need to be making major sway bar changes to fix the inherent under steer characteristics of the car. A softer front sway bar softens up the front and makes it less precise, while a harder rear bar makes the car less compliant off the corners. So being more in the M/M range on the bars is a better place to be. On 19 inch tires and wheels, you are also 9mm lower to the ground, which also improves downforce in both the front and rear of the car.
With more relative front grip from the 20mm wider tires, only 10mm in the rear, you can add more rear downforce with a wing and not be as susceptible to aero induced understeer. Of course adding the 4RS front aero guides with any major wing upgrade is a safe and logical upgrade.
Question: Aren't the DBJ and Dundon parts the same or nearly so?
With more relative front grip from the 20mm wider tires, only 10mm in the rear, you can add more rear downforce with a wing and not be as susceptible to aero induced understeer. Of course adding the 4RS front aero guides with any major wing upgrade is a safe and logical upgrade.
Question: Aren't the DBJ and Dundon parts the same or nearly so?
why didn't you go for the 18 inch? i'm wondering since we are replacing the brakes we could go 18s which will be perfect same as the clubsport GT4s. please correct me as i'm tempted to go either 18s or if not 19s for a track setup
#58
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have the 1450mm wing. It mounts to the stock uprights in about 10 minutes and requires no modifications to the car. Jacob also has a 1450mm RS wing which has a swan neck mount as well as a larger 1600mm wing. Link to the one I have:
https://designsbyjacob.com/products/...ar-wing-1450mm
https://designsbyjacob.com/products/...ar-wing-1450mm
![Frown](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
#59
#60
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
1. The tires are wider and the stagger changes reduce understeer by providing more front grip.
2. Your ride height goes down some but not crazy low like the Clubsports.
3. Your gearing is shortened by about 2.5 percent, which is great for acceleration on a car that is said to have gearing that is too tall.
4. Plenty of available tires to chose from...when they are in stock.
5. The ride height on both the front and rear tires is identical keeping PSM happy.
6. Car still looks good. The 20s look the best, the 19s are ok, and the 18s are a little too small for my tastes.
7. They fit over the stock brake calipers without any modifications or spacers needed.
8. They fit the wheel wells with minimal modifications, which mods are things that we all will do anyways to prep our cars for the track to have a good -3.0 of camber up front. I am up to -3.2 now.
The following users liked this post:
PGTGULF (01-29-2023)