Paint quality (stone chips)
The following users liked this post:
wcw67 (07-26-2020)
#17
I didn't get a single stone chip on either of my prior Spyders or my Cayman S, and none of them had PPF. I think a lot of it has to do with where you live. My GT4 is going au natural, nicks, marks and all. Battle scars.
#18
Thank you everyone for quick reply! It seems consistent with everyone else experience but a little disappointed they Porsche went to eco-friendly/water based paint. I really recommend for anyone who wants a perfect paint to get PPF asap on all the critical areas before driving it. Lesson learned for myself. Also these sticky and wide rear tires throw a lot of rocks on the rear bumper. For anyone who tracks a lot, you will notice rock chips are common because of the sticky tires of cars in front. Tracwrap is not best looking, you can always go with XPEL 10mm vs. 8mm. I ended up getting ppf on bumper, hood, front fender, mirrors, windshield/A pillar, small section of rear bumper, full rocker with side vents, duckbill spoiler.
#19
I had ppf on my black 981S Boxster and hated it. So I didn’t get it on my jet black metallic 981 Spyder. While there were a few chips here and there, it wasn’t really noticeable unless you scrutinized the paint under direct lighting. And frankly, I doubt I would have been offered any more money in trade had I ppfed the car.
It’s a personal choice, some people are ocd about their paint. I just don’t like film on my cars. I got the ceramic but not the ppf. Since my car is GT Silver, I might consider one of the newer ppfs.. Problem is, when the film gets all marked up, you have to rewrap it. It might be just cheaper to respray any affected areas.
I wish there was a thicker ceramic clear coat product that offered comparable protection or you could check a Porsche option that tripled the layer of the clear coat. That would provide plenty of depth to compound and buff away chips and scratches without needing to wrap and rewrap.
It’s a personal choice, some people are ocd about their paint. I just don’t like film on my cars. I got the ceramic but not the ppf. Since my car is GT Silver, I might consider one of the newer ppfs.. Problem is, when the film gets all marked up, you have to rewrap it. It might be just cheaper to respray any affected areas.
I wish there was a thicker ceramic clear coat product that offered comparable protection or you could check a Porsche option that tripled the layer of the clear coat. That would provide plenty of depth to compound and buff away chips and scratches without needing to wrap and rewrap.
#20
Rennlist Member
I think people's opinions about PPF are somewhat correlated with the amount of debris and traffic that's typical on the roads they frequent most.
#21
I think that with the sport cup tires the rockers and the lower portion are going to experience some serious chips. When a car drives by with those tires (at low speed especially when it’s hot) you can hear all of the small gravel that’s being picked up by the tires and thrown at the body and the inside of the wheel arches.
#22
If you track the car PPF is a must....my 718 GT4 is getting the new Xpel that's thicker in the rockers and hood and the regular one elsewhere. I replaced the PPF on my 981 GT4 twice in +4 years and it was worth the money but the hood and rockers are prime targets and did have a couple of hits that went through the PPF. The tires on these cars don't help either and if you are like me who uses Pirelli DHs or Hoosiers for the track even worst.
The following users liked this post:
DFW01TT (07-27-2020)
The following users liked this post:
n4v4nod (07-27-2020)
#24
I had ppf on my black 981S Boxster and hated it. So I didn’t get it on my jet black metallic 981 Spyder. While there were a few chips here and there, it wasn’t really noticeable unless you scrutinized the paint under direct lighting. And frankly, I doubt I would have been offered any more money in trade had I ppfed the car.
It’s a personal choice, some people are ocd about their paint. I just don’t like film on my cars. I got the ceramic but not the ppf. Since my car is GT Silver, I might consider one of the newer ppfs.. Problem is, when the film gets all marked up, you have to rewrap it. It might be just cheaper to respray any affected areas.
I wish there was a thicker ceramic clear coat product that offered comparable protection or you could check a Porsche option that tripled the layer of the clear coat. That would provide plenty of depth to compound and buff away chips and scratches without needing to wrap and rewrap.
It’s a personal choice, some people are ocd about their paint. I just don’t like film on my cars. I got the ceramic but not the ppf. Since my car is GT Silver, I might consider one of the newer ppfs.. Problem is, when the film gets all marked up, you have to rewrap it. It might be just cheaper to respray any affected areas.
I wish there was a thicker ceramic clear coat product that offered comparable protection or you could check a Porsche option that tripled the layer of the clear coat. That would provide plenty of depth to compound and buff away chips and scratches without needing to wrap and rewrap.
#25
#27
#28
I tend to change my wraps every 3 years but if the wear & tear is high due to track use I do it earlier. If you don't track or use the car often you can get more life out of it.
Leaving the wrap a long time is not a good idea specially if the car is used daily and/or is outside a garage a lot of time...I have seen damages to paint when removing it due to leaving it a long time.
The following users liked this post:
tthellott T (07-29-2020)
#29
Skip to 1:40
#30
I heard from a local detailer that has done PPF on the 718 spyder with only hundreds of kms on it....had rock chips on the rocker and behind rear wheel.