Notices
Taycan 2019-Current The Electric Porsche
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Nobody is talking about it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2021, 04:10 AM
  #16  
AlexCeres
Rennlist Member
 
AlexCeres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 2,894
Received 1,703 Likes on 1,041 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by umwolverine
I actually think the Porsche EV's are not very profitable right now. There are press releases with Blume stating the Taycan won't make money until 2023 primarily because of the battery costs, which they estimate will come down significantly over the next few years. I'm playing my part in supporting the base Taycan - below from the same article:

This is part of the reason why Porsche has launched with the expensive Taycan Turbo and Turbo S models. The truth is they’re not that much more expensive to build than lower-end models.
Blume was very clearly talking about paying off the platform development costs and the factory infrastructure. The taycan is already profitable per unit. But they did build an entirely new factory for it. It’ll take, allegedly, until 2023 for the taycan to pay off itself. This is not at all the same thing as saying the taycan isn’t profitable.

A 100kw battery pack costs about $14,000 now. Porsche will get a few thousand more in profit by 2023 as packs come down to less than $100/kw, but not vastly more.
Old 02-07-2021, 04:12 AM
  #17  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 0
Received 12,012 Likes on 5,235 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveo4porsche
the pricing and power/performance make perfect sense in the context of the entire Porsche Product line - and there in lies the problem - they can’t price the Taycan’s appropriately without trashing their existing product line sales…

porsche is trying to pull off a very very delicate transition here - they need to ramp down their ICE business, but it currently makes them a lot of money - and if they priced the new product line appropriately it would tank the panamera business for example…

so we’re left with artificial product designations that make less sense in an EV world, and they are priced so as not to threaten the existing ICE business…


it’s a class problem for existing manufactures transitioning to a new disruptive technology - porsche is trying to adopt/promote the disruption technology while controlling hte amount of disruption to their existing line

so we end up with $80k RWD taycan’s that really aren’t that compelling…we all know porsche could price a 4S at 90k and make some of hte options standard but that’s a bit too disruptive to their existing business…
BMW is facing the same existential dilemma.

Last edited by ipse dixit; 02-07-2021 at 04:13 AM.
Old 02-07-2021, 04:30 AM
  #18  
AlexCeres
Rennlist Member
 
AlexCeres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 2,894
Received 1,703 Likes on 1,041 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
BMW is facing the same existential dilemma.
eh. Except they’re 5 years behind Porsche’s curve, and as late as 2019 were in complete denial. Mercedes and Tesla have been feasting rampantly on BMW market share. BMW canceled all their interesting hybrids and the leads all quit or were fired. Their BEV products are all vaporware which they appear to have only started after firing their last CEO. Porsche (who learned it from Tesla) realized you can’t make a world class bev on an ice platform. But BMW said they would. Lolz.

Porsche expects to sell 40% EV, 10% hybrid within 5 years. Which at least seems vaguely plausible.

so I don’t think I’d call it the same dilemma
The following 2 users liked this post by AlexCeres:
Der-Schwabe (02-07-2021), unclewill (02-07-2021)
Old 02-09-2021, 09:26 AM
  #19  
XLR82XS
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
XLR82XS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: FL | Vegas
Posts: 1,598
Received 692 Likes on 452 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by leaf345
Carwow didn't seem to like the base that much, suggested you just go for the 4S.
I priced a "base" and a 4S. 4S came in ~8K higher.

Last edited by XLR82XS; 03-31-2021 at 04:01 PM.
Old 02-09-2021, 10:57 PM
  #20  
Dr Chill
Rennlist Member
 
Dr Chill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 269 Likes on 169 Posts
Default

I specced an identical base car to my 4S and the difference was 18k.
The following users liked this post:
genebarlow (02-22-2021)
Old 02-10-2021, 07:43 PM
  #21  
Cheshi143
Pro
 
Cheshi143's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 509
Received 284 Likes on 145 Posts
Default

Similar situation here. My current base model spec is $111,410

4S in same configuration is $133,800

<$22,930>

Last edited by Cheshi143; 02-10-2021 at 07:44 PM.
Old 02-22-2021, 11:23 PM
  #22  
genebarlow
Intermediate
 
genebarlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 26
Received 58 Likes on 15 Posts
Default


I went with a well optioned 4S.....$140msrp. The base would need at least 35-40k in options to leave me with no regrets.
The following 7 users liked this post by genebarlow:
daveo4porsche (02-22-2021), Der-Schwabe (02-23-2021), flygdchman (02-26-2021), leaf345 (03-05-2021), whiz944 (02-23-2021), wizee (02-26-2021), Zcd1 (02-23-2021) and 2 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 02-23-2021, 09:07 AM
  #23  
Zcd1
Racer
 
Zcd1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: MI/CA
Posts: 332
Received 135 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by genebarlow
I went with a well optioned 4S...
Very handsome ride - congratulations and enjoy!
Old 02-24-2021, 06:22 PM
  #24  
teslafan420
1st Gear
 
teslafan420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclewill
So the new $80,000 “entry level” Taycan is slow as molasses, weighs as much as a garbage truck, is as long as a bus and comes with nearly no equipment beyond a heater. Is everybody cool with this? 🤔
Absolutely! This is what I was waiting for! Hopefully they give a good trade in on the M3P!
Old 02-25-2021, 11:23 PM
  #25  
cometguy
Burning Brakes
 
cometguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CARB state, USA
Posts: 1,147
Received 229 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cheshi143
Similar situation here. My current base model spec is $111,410

4S in same configuration is $133,800

<$22,930>
Same here.. I get about USD $23k difference with same options between Taycan 2 and Taycan 4S... Since my first BEV will be bought only for local commuting (no road trips with public charging), I'm very tempted to go for the Taycan 2.
Old 03-05-2021, 02:16 AM
  #26  
z3mcoupe
Rennlist Member
 
z3mcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 832
Received 179 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

I'd happily roll in a base Taycan. I don't need AWD in CA, and the car is more than quick enough to be as fast or faster than the majority of commuting cars out there. Granted, you probably need close to $10k of options to make it not look so plain on the outside and inside, but this is plenty enough car for me. Having said all that, I love how the Sport Turismo looks so much I'd just go for that.
The following users liked this post:
Needsdecaf (03-05-2021)
Old 03-05-2021, 11:49 AM
  #27  
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Needsdecaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Woodlands, TX.
Posts: 8,914
Received 2,619 Likes on 1,627 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z3mcoupe
I'd happily roll in a base Taycan. I don't need AWD in CA, and the car is more than quick enough to be as fast or faster than the majority of commuting cars out there. Granted, you probably need close to $10k of options to make it not look so plain on the outside and inside, but this is plenty enough car for me. Having said all that, I love how the Sport Turismo looks so much I'd just go for that.
Yup. I think the Sport Tourismo 4 is the no-brainer choice if you're into the shape.

Yes, it's $10k more, BUT that price includes standard air suspension, larger battery and pano sunroof. PLUS AWD, which is actually a bigger benefit than you would think with a powerful EV. Plus more headroom, more cargo space, more versatilty and better rear visibility. All of those things for $1,500 more ($90,720 vs. $92,200).

So if you were down for air suspension, big battery and roof, it's a no brainer to get the Cross Turismo. Only reason to get Cayenne base is if you wanted to really keep the price low by not selecting those options, or you don't like the wagon shape. Which I understand not everyone will.

This applies base Taycan to CT4 only.

Last edited by Needsdecaf; 03-05-2021 at 11:53 AM.
Old 03-05-2021, 04:03 PM
  #28  
freqflyer
Instructor
 
freqflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 128
Received 34 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclewill
So the new $80,000 “entry level” Taycan is slow as molasses, weighs as much as a garbage truck, is as long as a bus and comes with nearly no equipment beyond a heater. Is everybody cool with this? 🤔
It's a Porsche not a VW.
Old 03-10-2021, 07:44 PM
  #29  
991carreradriver
Rennlist Member
 
991carreradriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,155
Received 429 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cheshi143
I'm cool with it. Have another Porsche when I want to go faster than molasses. I have no use for a heater though, I guess I should have added some options.
^^^ +1
My build came in a 107k, more than my 2014 911 or my 2016 911, but much less than my GT3. If I wanted another fast car, I would have ordered it. There is only some much of me to go around.

Last edited by 991carreradriver; 03-10-2021 at 07:48 PM.



Quick Reply: Nobody is talking about it



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:46 AM.