Notices
Taycan 2019-Current The Electric Porsche
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rant: Taycan "Turbo S" Nomenclature

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2019 | 02:18 PM
  #1  
Midtowner's Avatar
Midtowner
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 3
From: San Jose, CA
Default Rant: Taycan "Turbo S" Nomenclature

Someone please tell me why Porsche decided to name the Taycan a "Turbo S"? The last time I recall, EV's don't have a turbo. Calling it a turbo is like some idiot up-badging a non-turbo car. It's fake and an insult to all those Turbo owners including me.

WTH was Porsche thinking?

And don't get me started on the Taycan name. Or it's ugly as sin design.
Old 09-04-2019 | 02:26 PM
  #2  
beaudawg's Avatar
beaudawg
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 99
Likes: 9
Default

Years of model trim history and owners that understand the nomenclature are the most obvious reasons why. Does it make sense? Not particularly; however, computers used to have "Turbo" buttons, as well.
Old 09-04-2019 | 02:34 PM
  #3  
phx991's Avatar
phx991
Racer
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 381
Likes: 6
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Default

It’s a name, what’s the difference really. My 991.2 has a two turbos but turbo is not part of the name.
Old 09-04-2019 | 02:35 PM
  #4  
JC Lacayo's Avatar
JC Lacayo
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 630
Likes: 137
Default

Taycan +
Taycan ++
Taycan S
Taycan S+

All ideas to use instead
The following users liked this post:
Midtowner (09-04-2019)
Old 09-04-2019 | 02:49 PM
  #5  
limegreen's Avatar
limegreen
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 661
Likes: 140
Default

I find it hilarious that their new EV, which seeks to distance itself from ICE and touts "sustainability" relies on a name synonymous with ICE performance to help market / sell them.

They could have easily come up with a unique and suitable name for differentiating the Taycan models but chose instead to take the " consumers are stupid " marketing approach that is all too common in the auto industry these days....
The following 6 users liked this post by limegreen:
chance6 (09-05-2019), Midtowner (09-04-2019), Spokayman (09-05-2019), T3X4S (09-04-2019), Thor's (09-07-2019), twospyders (09-05-2019) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 09-04-2019 | 02:54 PM
  #6  
Midtowner's Avatar
Midtowner
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 3
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by limegreen
I find it hilarious that their new EV, which seeks to distance itself from ICE and touts "sustainability" relies on a name synonymous with ICE performance to help market / sell them.

They could have easily come up with a unique and suitable name for differentiating the different Taycan models but chose instead to take the " consumers are stupid " marketing approach that is all too common in the auto industry these days....
I couldn't have said it better.
Old 09-04-2019 | 03:47 PM
  #7  
JAhmed's Avatar
JAhmed
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 1,927
From: CHICAGOLAND!!!
Default

Originally Posted by limegreen
I find it hilarious that their new EV, which seeks to distance itself from ICE and touts "sustainability" relies on a name synonymous with ICE performance to help market / sell them.

They could have easily come up with a unique and suitable name for differentiating the Taycan models but chose instead to take the " consumers are stupid " marketing approach that is all too common in the auto industry these days....

To be fair, the vast majority of consumers ARE stupid.
The following 3 users liked this post by JAhmed:
limegreen (09-04-2019), Midtowner (09-04-2019), pokingaround (09-04-2019)
Old 09-04-2019 | 04:13 PM
  #8  
evil panda's Avatar
evil panda
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 419
Likes: 146
Default

It bothers me too. People who order the Taycan need to vote by checking the ‘rear badge delete’ option!
Old 09-04-2019 | 04:24 PM
  #9  
audi49's Avatar
audi49
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 670
Likes: 131
From: Greer, SC
Default

Don't like this either. I'd like to think the average Porsche buyer is intelligent enough to not be drawn to the traditional 'turbo' designation and instead to something more fitting of an electric vehicle that they could have come up with. And then there is the 'Taycan' name... no one knows how to pronounce it without asking or checking online. 911 is classic, even 944 has a nice ring to it, boxster, cayman,… all good. Taycan is on the level of Tiguan.
Old 09-04-2019 | 04:36 PM
  #10  
pokingaround's Avatar
pokingaround
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 124
From: NY -> MA
Default

One could argue that Porsche already crossed this divide by having turbos on every engine yet only calling some of them a Turbo.

Don't get me wrong, it's especially egregious in an EV. But it's not like they've been model designation purists up to now.
The following users liked this post:
JAhmed (09-04-2019)
Old 09-04-2019 | 04:53 PM
  #11  
Alan Smithee's Avatar
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,309
Likes: 305
From: Los Angeles
Default

It's embarrassing. Like if Chevy put a '427 V8' badge on a high-performance Bolt.
Old 09-04-2019 | 05:03 PM
  #12  
Midtowner's Avatar
Midtowner
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 3
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by audi49
Don't like this either. I'd like to think the average Porsche buyer is intelligent enough to not be drawn to the traditional 'turbo' designation and instead to something more fitting of an electric vehicle that they could have come up with. And then there is the 'Taycan' name... no one knows how to pronounce it without asking or checking online. 911 is classic, even 944 has a nice ring to it, boxster, cayman,… all good. Taycan is on the level of Tiguan.
If you have to go out of the way to produce a video on how to pronounce a model name then perhaps choosing a different name is in order. Or maybe all the other were already "taken".

The following users liked this post:
destaccado (09-06-2019)
Old 09-04-2019 | 06:30 PM
  #13  
MaxLTV's Avatar
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 1,277
From: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Default

Using "turbo" to label top or fastest or the most potent version of something is commonplace. It's part of the evolution of the language. Dunkin has Turbo Short coffee, Nike has Turbo running shoes, Motorolla had Droid Turbo phones etc. It's normal to carry over older names to new concepts. Just like we call open top cars "Spider" which is a type of a horse carriage, but guess what - no horses there anymore. Keeping the same nomenclature makes sense for Porsche.

Just give me longer range, lower weight, and more reasonable price, and call it anything you want.
The following users liked this post:
jivor (09-06-2019)
Old 09-04-2019 | 06:31 PM
  #14  
MaxLTV's Avatar
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 1,277
From: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
It's embarrassing. Like if Chevy put a '427 V8' badge on a high-performance Bolt.
Or like AMG putting the "63" badge on cars with 4-liter engines. right?
Old 09-04-2019 | 07:01 PM
  #15  
Alan Smithee's Avatar
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,309
Likes: 305
From: Los Angeles
Default

^ Inflation of German model number badges started in the early 1980s with the BMW 745i and 320i and has only gotten worse.

For an engineering company to label an EV a 'turbo', though...pathetic. Even more so that shoes and coffee also use the name.
The following 2 users liked this post by Alan Smithee:
Midtowner (09-05-2019), Thor's (09-07-2019)


Quick Reply: Rant: Taycan "Turbo S" Nomenclature



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:53 AM.