Tesla existential threat?
I have a signature S - i was converted many moons ago. it's not my car of choice on weekends for a sprinted drive. chose the right tool for the right job.
I have a signature S - i was converted many moons ago. it's not my car of choice on weekends for a sprinted drive. chose the right tool for the right job.
.........and in the US the vehicle that zips off the shelf is the F150. The reality is vehicles are used for many reasons. Also, to be frank - over here the P95 costs about $190k and doesn't have good fit and finish (the plain truth is they are shoddy). A 50K Mazda 6 is a better proposition for most people (and is far better made too).Its not enough for a car to be an EV, it still has to do what a car does and make economic sense to the buyer. Economic sense means purchase price and factoring in additional costs e.g. power walls, solar panels, space and location of chargers etc.
The Porsche business plan is smart - be a fast follower, watch and learn from the mistakes of others, don't over promise and under deliver and most importantly find the right price point for the product to ensure the company remains viable.
The other very important point that Porsche seems to fully understand is the EV is a long way from a mass market vehicle (e.g. what are the F150 buyers going to do). There are an awful lot of people on struggle street, that can at best, afford very low end second hand ice vehicles. I think some EV owners would do well to understand this.
Personally I think Tesla are toast - from a business perspective it appears you can't trust Musk e.g. failed to meet guidance 20 times........
Last edited by RRDnA; Feb 28, 2018 at 01:09 AM.
Unable to charge at home? Ohio looks good: supercharge.info
If Porsche chases drivers, they'll do fine. Tesla's focus is passengers, but handling a big skateboard battery can make up for that.[/quote]
If that's the case it must be focused on the niche market of short passengers given the lack of room in the backseat of the Model S.
The Model S is already plateauing and it's going to get destroyed by competition over the next few years if there isn't a massive redesign coming in the near term.
Cheers
Yeah he consumes capital in building products. Who cares?
The only thing that matters is the product. You guys are missing the point. $TSLA shorts and one line Musk/Tesla haters are literally an infinite source of bemused entertainment.
Put your money where your mouth is and go ahead, short the stock in size.
Yeah. That's what I thought.....
Yeah he consumes capital in building products. Who cares?
The only thing that matters is the product. You guys are missing the point. $TSLA shorts and one line Musk/Tesla haters are literally an infinite source of bemused entertainment.
Put your money where your mouth is and go ahead, short the stock in size.
Yeah. That's what I thought.....
Battery positioning........SpaceX..........Roadmap........I suspect you feel Musk is some sort of a visionary
Without any doubt, there will be a dilutive share offering at Tesla within the next two years. I do not want to be in the stock when that happens. I do want to get back in after the dilution.
Personally, I want the company to succeed as an automobile manufacturer and provide their solar roofing tiles and power storage units, it's a great dream.
Can't wait for the Mission E as well to see how Porsche pushed their creativity. It's a great time to be a car enthusiast!
Yeah he consumes capital in building products. Who cares?
The only thing that matters is the product. You guys are missing the point. $TSLA shorts and one line Musk/Tesla haters are literally an infinite source of bemused entertainment.
Put your money where your mouth is and go ahead, short the stock in size.
Yeah. That's what I thought.....
But yes Mr. Haney, I mean Elon Musk seems to be able to convince investors to keep giving him money. As far as 'delivers'? He hasn't delivered a positive CFROI on any of his businesses yet and it remains to be seen whether he ever will.
The Best Porsche Posts for Porsche Enthusiasts
Let's look at where the core arbitrage is across the businesses, shall we
UTA is a monopoly combining the two largest aerospace companies as sole bidder for govt contracts. Better engineering, competition and more importantly Reusability offer a 50% cost advantage to the new proven entrant.
ICE engines (let's exclude the Porsche, Ferrari and Mazda's) and end of life complexity monstrosities which cost over $1B to develop at minimum incremental gain against collapsing regulation. An electric motor has four parts, a stator, a rotor, an invertor and an ECU, fundamentals of which are 100+ years old. Moving parts is -95%. Drivetrain life is over 1MM miles. Maintenance is half and going down.
Energy. Yeah. -7% mini moores law over the last 20 years on solar capture and storage is not slowing down. Solar is within 30% cost of cheapest fossil fuel. Reduces infrastructure investment in T&D and generation in the system. Plentiful. Endless supply.
So yeah. Who cares about ROCE, EV to EBITDA, or burn rate during the 5-10 years it takes to play out the arb. Each of these markets are half a trillion addressable worldwide? So yeah, as long as he delivers (rockets fly and land, cars run on the road, solar gets installed) he's gonna get capital (or "bailed out" if you prefer)
Have a few legacy shares which cover my initial investment years ago when the S came out. I'm not saying the stock is a good investment. No opinion.
I'm holding two perhaps inconsistent to you thoughts in my brain that my TTS is a thing of beauty and Tesla is attacking big opportunities.
But come to the discussion with better arguments than K and Qs and EPS guidance. It's the forest, friend.
And as always,
The people who care don't matter. The people who matter don't care.
https://static1.squarespace.com/stat...ort_051517.pdf
For example. Race a Tesla and any other car from Akron to New York or DC then the tesla looses by hours. Not as bad as it was when raced against the model T a couple years ago. But still not like a regular car.
I do think electric is the future. FUTURE. Not here yet and not close. 10 years? Nope. 20? Maybe. 50 years? For sure. But by then I don't care
Last edited by dgjks6; Mar 1, 2018 at 05:08 PM.
Yeah he consumes capital in building products. Who cares?
The only thing that matters is the product. You guys are missing the point. $TSLA shorts and one line Musk/Tesla haters are literally an infinite source of bemused entertainment.
Put your money where your mouth is and go ahead, short the stock in size.
Yeah. That's what I thought.....
Let's look at where the core arbitrage is across the businesses, shall we
UTA is a monopoly combining the two largest aerospace companies as sole bidder for govt contracts. Better engineering, competition and more importantly Reusability offer a 50% cost advantage to the new proven entrant.
ICE engines (let's exclude the Porsche, Ferrari and Mazda's) and end of life complexity monstrosities which cost over $1B to develop at minimum incremental gain against collapsing regulation. An electric motor has four parts, a stator, a rotor, an invertor and an ECU, fundamentals of which are 100+ years old. Moving parts is -95%. Drivetrain life is over 1MM miles. Maintenance is half and going down.
Energy. Yeah. -7% mini moores law over the last 20 years on solar capture and storage is not slowing down. Solar is within 30% cost of cheapest fossil fuel. Reduces infrastructure investment in T&D and generation in the system. Plentiful. Endless supply.
So yeah. Who cares about ROCE, EV to EBITDA, or burn rate during the 5-10 years it takes to play out the arb. Each of these markets are half a trillion addressable worldwide? So yeah, as long as he delivers (rockets fly and land, cars run on the road, solar gets installed) he's gonna get capital (or "bailed out" if you prefer)
Have a few legacy shares which cover my initial investment years ago when the S came out. I'm not saying the stock is a good investment. No opinion.
I'm holding two perhaps inconsistent to you thoughts in my brain that my TTS is a thing of beauty and Tesla is attacking big opportunities.
But come to the discussion with better arguments than K and Qs and EPS guidance. It's the forest, friend.
And as always,
The people who care don't matter. The people who matter don't care.
Personally I am excited by BEVs and I was long Tesla for a good bit, but after the last earnings report I flattened out my position and now have a modest long-dated put option position. However, I am long in a variety of other companies related to electric vehicles etc. So, not a hater, but curious about your specific views.
I think Tesla's very difficult (and worsening) operating condition is going to make it more difficult for them to keep ahead of the coming competition. Yes, you have to see the forest, but one must still be aware of the tree that might fall on them! :-)
BEV super capital intensive and few well financed core patented players. Plus the play now is sectorial tech against all industrials. Winter coming.





