SPB 2019 Rule Proposal Changes
07-31-2018 | 12:54 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 995
Likes: 415
From: Alton, VA and Bethania, NC
SPB 2019 Rule Proposal Changes
Looks like there will be some small winter projects if these go through.
From rule proposal comments in latest club race newsletter:
"SPB:
a) Allow a up to 1/4th inch spacer for the rear wheels.
b) Allow a square spring setup with any allowed spring (i.e., 450/500, 500/450, 400/400, 500/500, plus stock).
c) Allow a bolt-on cross tie bar connecting the rear suspension sub-frame sides.
Proposals to allow later model engine covers and plastic floor pan undertrays are not being presented because there is no evidence that the SPB parts are inadequate, the later covers are lighter, and the undertray parts were introduced by Porsche to improve the aero. PCA Club Racing is pursuing options to deal with the reduced availability of the allowed stock rims, and it is hoped that an alternative may be announced by the end of the year."
thoughts?
From rule proposal comments in latest club race newsletter:
"SPB:
a) Allow a up to 1/4th inch spacer for the rear wheels.
b) Allow a square spring setup with any allowed spring (i.e., 450/500, 500/450, 400/400, 500/500, plus stock).
c) Allow a bolt-on cross tie bar connecting the rear suspension sub-frame sides.
Proposals to allow later model engine covers and plastic floor pan undertrays are not being presented because there is no evidence that the SPB parts are inadequate, the later covers are lighter, and the undertray parts were introduced by Porsche to improve the aero. PCA Club Racing is pursuing options to deal with the reduced availability of the allowed stock rims, and it is hoped that an alternative may be announced by the end of the year."
thoughts?
__________________
07-31-2018 | 09:51 AM
#2
Burning Brakes
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 124
I'm curious if adding an extra 1/2" to the car's stance (2 x 1/4" spacers) will actually make a noticeable difference in handling. That seems like the sort of thing only a handful of drivers (John Gladwill, Chris Drake, Todd Lamb, Aaron Elsner) could even feel... much less benefit from.
07-31-2018 | 10:59 PM
#3
Rennlist Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 198
From: New England
The spring thing sounds horrible
It'll cost three days in testing and 3 sets of tires to figure out - adds like 5 grand to my season
Let's just leave as is
Spacers always been somewhat legal - rules allow them for clearance
They are somewhat faster on the right track
It'll cost three days in testing and 3 sets of tires to figure out - adds like 5 grand to my season
Let's just leave as is
Spacers always been somewhat legal - rules allow them for clearance
They are somewhat faster on the right track
08-01-2018 | 12:24 AM
#4
Thread Starter
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 995
Likes: 415
From: Alton, VA and Bethania, NC
I'm curious if adding an extra 1/2" to the car's stance (2 x 1/4" spacers) will actually make a noticeable difference in handling. That seems like the sort of thing only a handful of drivers (John Gladwill, Chris Drake, Todd Lamb, Aaron Elsner) could even feel... much less benefit from.
Last edited by RennPart; 08-01-2018 at 01:50 PM.
08-01-2018 | 10:42 AM
#5
Rennlist Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 115
From: East Coast
I personally think the cars are just fine how they are.
08-01-2018 | 03:23 PM
#7
Nordschleife Master
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,426
Likes: 87
From: Altered States of America (B'ham)
Trending Topics
08-02-2018 | 12:41 AM
#10
Rennlist Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,950
Likes: 136
From: SLC, Utah
As a builder, I’d like to see minor tweaks to a few of the existing rules to provide clarity but without any intent to change anything.
Edit: I see Walt has made nearly every clarification I was hoping to see - looks great!
——-
SPB rules clarifications:
The following clarifications of the SPB rules are effective immediately:
1) Where "bumper" is used in 6.C. and 6.D., change to "bumper cover."
2) One or both side radiator fans may be removed.
3) Electrical wiring for parts which may be deleted may be removed.
4) Seam sealer, undercoating, weather stripping, and tubing for water drainage may be removed.
5) The windshield washer tank and the washer mechanisms may be removed.
6) The plastic fender liners may be removed, or holes cut in them.
7) Thermal insulation and shielding may be removed.
8) The clamshell piece over removed convertible top components may be attached to the body in any secure manner.
Edit: I see Walt has made nearly every clarification I was hoping to see - looks great!
——-
SPB rules clarifications:
The following clarifications of the SPB rules are effective immediately:
1) Where "bumper" is used in 6.C. and 6.D., change to "bumper cover."
2) One or both side radiator fans may be removed.
3) Electrical wiring for parts which may be deleted may be removed.
4) Seam sealer, undercoating, weather stripping, and tubing for water drainage may be removed.
5) The windshield washer tank and the washer mechanisms may be removed.
6) The plastic fender liners may be removed, or holes cut in them.
7) Thermal insulation and shielding may be removed.
8) The clamshell piece over removed convertible top components may be attached to the body in any secure manner.
Last edited by ace37; 08-02-2018 at 01:21 AM.
08-02-2018 | 02:15 AM
#11
Instructor
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 163
Likes: 33
From: San Francisco, CA
The rules clarifications all seem good.
The a/b/c proposals are not good. I agree with the sentiment that these just increase cost, and do not improve the racing.
I like the proposal to award points on all races.
The a/b/c proposals are not good. I agree with the sentiment that these just increase cost, and do not improve the racing.
I like the proposal to award points on all races.
08-02-2018 | 08:37 AM
#12
Rennlist Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 385
Likes: 5
From: New York, NY
