Lowered on 20s
I've seen those lips on the Suncoast web site.
Here:
http://www.suncoastparts.com/product/SKU991RQTRM.html
Here:
http://www.suncoastparts.com/product/SKU991RQTRM.html
Last edited by LexVan; Sep 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM.
It's actually just a little extension of the rear fender. It's an OEM option in Japan, I travel to Tokyo quite a bit and thought it was a unique little option I saw on local 991's during my time in Japan.
My subtle way of making my 991 a little different.
Not sure I Would do it again though.
My subtle way of making my 991 a little different.
Not sure I Would do it again though.
Thank you all for the feedback. I did complete the install and will start another thread about my experience with the installer (wonderful shop).
The car is lowered with TechArt Springs and I installed 15mm spacers up front and 7mm spacers in the back. Alignment is set up more towards track so I'm running -2 camber up front and -1.5 in the back. Otherwise, it's within factory specs on tow and caster.
Here are a few pics.
The car is lowered with TechArt Springs and I installed 15mm spacers up front and 7mm spacers in the back. Alignment is set up more towards track so I'm running -2 camber up front and -1.5 in the back. Otherwise, it's within factory specs on tow and caster.
Here are a few pics.
Thank you all for the feedback. I did complete the install and will start another thread about my experience with the installer (wonderful shop).
The car is lowered with TechArt Springs and I installed 15mm spacers up front and 7mm spacers in the back. Alignment is set up more towards track so I'm running -2 camber up front and -1.5 in the back. Otherwise, it's within factory specs on tow and caster.
Here are a few pics.
The car is lowered with TechArt Springs and I installed 15mm spacers up front and 7mm spacers in the back. Alignment is set up more towards track so I'm running -2 camber up front and -1.5 in the back. Otherwise, it's within factory specs on tow and caster.
Here are a few pics.
Very nicely done, I love an OEM+ setup.
Thanks porsche_love!
jimbo, the ride in "comfort chassis" mode feels almost the same as stock comfort mode when I'm not pushing the car. However, it corners much flatter, steering response is quicker, and it feels more stable at high speeds and in long high speed sweeps. In "sport chassis" mode, it's an animal! Everything gets tighter and quicker. It corners extremely flat yet absorbs bad roads very well.
The car was equipped with standard PASM and I felt that it was very nice to drive but I needed to set it in "sport chassis" most of the times even for daily driving because in "comfort chassis" it was a bit too soft for spirited driving. My goal with the TechArt springs was to be able to use the car daily in "comfort chassis" mode and only need the "sport chassis" mode on the track. This is EXACTLY what the TechArt springs did. Now, in "comfort chassis" mode the car is docile at normal speed but very responsive and flat at spirited driving. The "sport chassis" mode is best for the track!
jimbo, the ride in "comfort chassis" mode feels almost the same as stock comfort mode when I'm not pushing the car. However, it corners much flatter, steering response is quicker, and it feels more stable at high speeds and in long high speed sweeps. In "sport chassis" mode, it's an animal! Everything gets tighter and quicker. It corners extremely flat yet absorbs bad roads very well.
The car was equipped with standard PASM and I felt that it was very nice to drive but I needed to set it in "sport chassis" most of the times even for daily driving because in "comfort chassis" it was a bit too soft for spirited driving. My goal with the TechArt springs was to be able to use the car daily in "comfort chassis" mode and only need the "sport chassis" mode on the track. This is EXACTLY what the TechArt springs did. Now, in "comfort chassis" mode the car is docile at normal speed but very responsive and flat at spirited driving. The "sport chassis" mode is best for the track!
I believe the main reason that the 991.2 is different is that it comes with an 11.5" wheel in the rear rather than 11" as the 991.1
I'm not sure if there are other differences in wheel offset between the .1 and .2
Thanks porsche_love!
jimbo, the ride in "comfort chassis" mode feels almost the same as stock comfort mode when I'm not pushing the car. However, it corners much flatter, steering response is quicker, and it feels more stable at high speeds and in long high speed sweeps. In "sport chassis" mode, it's an animal! Everything gets tighter and quicker. It corners extremely flat yet absorbs bad roads very well.
The car was equipped with standard PASM and I felt that it was very nice to drive but I needed to set it in "sport chassis" most of the times even for daily driving because in "comfort chassis" it was a bit too soft for spirited driving. My goal with the TechArt springs was to be able to use the car daily in "comfort chassis" mode and only need the "sport chassis" mode on the track. This is EXACTLY what the TechArt springs did. Now, in "comfort chassis" mode the car is docile at normal speed but very responsive and flat at spirited driving. The "sport chassis" mode is best for the track!
jimbo, the ride in "comfort chassis" mode feels almost the same as stock comfort mode when I'm not pushing the car. However, it corners much flatter, steering response is quicker, and it feels more stable at high speeds and in long high speed sweeps. In "sport chassis" mode, it's an animal! Everything gets tighter and quicker. It corners extremely flat yet absorbs bad roads very well.
The car was equipped with standard PASM and I felt that it was very nice to drive but I needed to set it in "sport chassis" most of the times even for daily driving because in "comfort chassis" it was a bit too soft for spirited driving. My goal with the TechArt springs was to be able to use the car daily in "comfort chassis" mode and only need the "sport chassis" mode on the track. This is EXACTLY what the TechArt springs did. Now, in "comfort chassis" mode the car is docile at normal speed but very responsive and flat at spirited driving. The "sport chassis" mode is best for the track!
Drives straight without issues at all. The only thing I noticed is that wet traction is a bit compromised, especially in corners. The rear breaks traction now a bit more easily when the roads are wet but it's rather predictable and easily corrected. I may end up taking out the negative camber from the rear and running a slight negative camber in the front only.
Drives straight without issues at all. The only thing I noticed is that wet traction is a bit compromised, especially in corners. The rear breaks traction now a bit more easily when the roads are wet but it's rather predictable and easily corrected. I may end up taking out the negative camber from the rear and running a slight negative camber in the front only.
Thank you all for the feedback. I did complete the install and will start another thread about my experience with the installer (wonderful shop).
The car is lowered with TechArt Springs and I installed 15mm spacers up front and 7mm spacers in the back. Alignment is set up more towards track so I'm running -2 camber up front and -1.5 in the back. Otherwise, it's within factory specs on tow and caster.
Here are a few pics.
The car is lowered with TechArt Springs and I installed 15mm spacers up front and 7mm spacers in the back. Alignment is set up more towards track so I'm running -2 camber up front and -1.5 in the back. Otherwise, it's within factory specs on tow and caster.
Here are a few pics.
Your car looks so good! I think I may get Sport Techno wheels and copy your look.
I have similar but with HRE now.
For the sake of the conversation, I have SPASM and rub lip slightly in and out of driveway.
Aaron
I have similar but with HRE now.
For the sake of the conversation, I have SPASM and rub lip slightly in and out of driveway.
Aaron



