Notices

Esso 93 vs Petro-Can 94

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2015, 12:56 AM
  #1  
JayinToronto
Racer
Thread Starter
 
JayinToronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 345
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Esso 93 vs Petro-Can 94

Just noticed that the Esso beside my condo carries 93+. Did a quick search but couldn't find any info on how this compared to Petro-Can 94. Currently I only use the 94 but am wondering if I now have a much more convenient place to fill up if this 93+ stuff is as good. Anybody with any info on this stuff?
Old 09-09-2015, 01:21 AM
  #2  
P0rsch3F113
Three Wheelin'
 
P0rsch3F113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: between TO and Barrie
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default Esso 93 vs Petro-Can 94

No info...but been using Esso 93 for the last year. No complaints.
Old 09-09-2015, 08:15 AM
  #3  
Bacura
Three Wheelin'
 
Bacura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default Esso 93 vs Petro-Can 94

Don't forget shell nitro. No ethanol. The esso and petrocan gas both have ethanol. 93 vs 94? No difference.
Old 09-09-2015, 11:35 AM
  #4  
Mike-H
Track Day
 
Mike-H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Technically there is a difference, but not enough to be noticed by your cars engine management system & there is the ethanol additive
Old 09-09-2015, 11:54 AM
  #5  
theiceman
Team Owner
 
theiceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cambridge Ontario Canada
Posts: 26,681
Received 1,024 Likes on 728 Posts
Default

i would imagine newer cars are designed to run ethanol fuels ( dont know this and its an assumption ) . But us in the older cars ethanol is a real no no . So Shell it is for us.
Old 09-09-2015, 11:55 AM
  #6  
mannn
Instructor
 
mannn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not scientifically proven.. but i seem to get better mileage out of shell 91 vs PetroCan 94... not that we care about mileage when we drive P cars... but it makes you think why and what's different...
Old 09-09-2015, 12:05 PM
  #7  
Mike-H
Track Day
 
Mike-H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fuel without ethanol burns better (so the story goes) but it has been proven that ethanol is not good for the rubber bits in your motor regardless of age (again so the experts say)
Old 09-09-2015, 12:07 PM
  #8  
69gaugeman
Nordschleife Master
 
69gaugeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mannn
not scientifically proven.. but i seem to get better mileage out of shell 91 vs PetroCan 94... not that we care about mileage when we drive P cars... but it makes you think why and what's different...
First go and get some real data to be sure.

Newer cars (like my 04 Cayenne) have an octane sensor and reduce timing and add fueling when using lower octane fuel.

Older ones just had knock sensors. For cars that just use knock sensors, use the lowest octane that does not produce knocking. This will save you money. For the others I would use the octane rated for the car. Higher octane can only help so much as you cannot add timing indefinitely.
Old 09-09-2015, 12:12 PM
  #9  
BIG smoke
Drifting
 
BIG smoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: BIG smoke eh!
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 0
Received 142 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

93 or 94?
I'm sure the swill that the previous customer left in the hose will negate that octane benefit.
Computer are going to manage any difference in fuel.
If I were in the middle of no-where, and needed gas, I'd put the best I could in.
All the station advertise they have the best. Often their supplies come from the same processing plant.
Old 09-09-2015, 01:36 PM
  #10  
P0rsch3F113
Three Wheelin'
 
P0rsch3F113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: between TO and Barrie
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mannn
not scientifically proven.. but i seem to get better mileage out of shell 91 vs PetroCan 94... not that we care about mileage when we drive P cars... but it makes you think why and what's different...
Surprised to hear that. In my car ('06 C4S) I got worse mileage with Shell 91 (and it felt weaker at higher RPM's). Stuck with Ultra 94, then Esso 93 became available in my area so been using that.
Old 09-09-2015, 10:50 PM
  #11  
JayinToronto
Racer
Thread Starter
 
JayinToronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 345
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Anyone know the ethanol percentage of the PetroCan 94 or the Esso 93?
Old 09-09-2015, 11:14 PM
  #12  
Pags993
Drifting
 
Pags993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,678
Received 136 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

I have read up to 10% on their websites. That's why I only use Shell 91 for the 993 with zero ethanol.
Old 09-10-2015, 08:33 AM
  #13  
Bacura
Three Wheelin'
 
Bacura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default Esso 93 vs Petro-Can 94

It's a shame. The old Sunoco Ultra 94 had no ethanol. Best of both worlds. It was a no brainer.
Old 09-10-2015, 08:43 PM
  #14  
bronson7
Nordschleife Master
 
bronson7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

So is the Petro Ultra 94 better to use in the GT3 or the Shell 91???
Old 09-10-2015, 09:09 PM
  #15  
Pags993
Drifting
 
Pags993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,678
Received 136 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

I would say 91 with zero ethanol is the better choice


Quick Reply: Esso 93 vs Petro-Can 94



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:11 AM.