Esso Supreme+ 93
"Shell V-Power premium gasoline in Canada does not contain ethanol."
Based on the issues in the marine industry. I prefer, when possible, to use ethanol-free gas. That being said, ECUs adapt to octane sensed , so will run just fine with both. My old turbos need the higher octane to prevent inadvertant detonation under boost, so I'm caught between a rock and a hard place. Love going to the Dragon, where there is a station that sells 104, no ethanol
Ultra 94 has ethanol in Ontario, but not Quebec
Petrocan's also sells Superclean 94 which does not have ethanol, you can get that out west.
I saw dyno charts between 91 and 93 octane on a tuned 993 and they were losing about 5% hp/tq due to the retarded timing on 91. So on a 991 S, that could be 20hp. Its probably not that much, but there is a difference for sure. Or at least I *think* I feel one. Its probably a MUCH bigger difference on turbo cars tuned for 93.
I heard the same thing Greg. Something about government mandate. They couldnt get around the loophole anymore of averaging across all grades of gas. Not sure though . It was on the internet however so it must be ture. People dont lie on the internet .
I have heard Ethanol is an issue for CIS cars because ethanol attracts water, and moisture and CIS systems dont get along. Plus I can't imagine ethanol reactes well with rubber and plastics not designed for it from cars built 30+ years ago.
Also keep in mind ethanol will do its worse in humid enviroments as it will atract moisture in gas tanks being vented in humid weather , as gas goes down in the tank humid air is pulled in.
For its heat California is not nearly as humid as we have here for example, or god knows Hong Kong for example . Thats when the ethanol will pull moisture.
All that said i have never had an issue with my car and i run all kinds of fuel, in the really hot weather i will run shell v- power to just regular plain old 87 during cooler wether ( my car doesnt call for premium or even mid grade ) the 78 and 79 is farly low compresion ratio engine so the demand for premium wallet emptying fuel just isnt there.
The only time i really hunt for ehanol free gas is when i am about to store for the winter .. then its shell V-power all the way ..
plus they made that awesome Ferrari commercial ..
Not making any drastic statements or recomendations, just a few points to consider.
Also keep in mind ethanol will do its worse in humid enviroments as it will atract moisture in gas tanks being vented in humid weather , as gas goes down in the tank humid air is pulled in.
For its heat California is not nearly as humid as we have here for example, or god knows Hong Kong for example . Thats when the ethanol will pull moisture.
All that said i have never had an issue with my car and i run all kinds of fuel, in the really hot weather i will run shell v- power to just regular plain old 87 during cooler wether ( my car doesnt call for premium or even mid grade ) the 78 and 79 is farly low compresion ratio engine so the demand for premium wallet emptying fuel just isnt there.
The only time i really hunt for ehanol free gas is when i am about to store for the winter .. then its shell V-power all the way ..
plus they made that awesome Ferrari commercial ..
Not making any drastic statements or recomendations, just a few points to consider.
Maybe because it's a turbo but my baby's mileage is about 15% better using Shell 91 without corn syrup vs Petro Can 94 with corn syrup. Excellence Mag. says corn syrup is not good for any Porsche engine so avoid it if ya can.
Last edited by ronnie993tt; Jun 3, 2014 at 08:20 PM.
In California, Porsche's largest market, the best gas you can get is 91 with 10% ethanol. I have a ton of friends with Porsches in the bay area from 80s 911s to 987 Caymans. And no one has issues. So its pretty safe. When storing a car, I go ethanol free (Shell 91).
I saw dyno charts between 91 and 93 octane on a tuned 993 and they were losing about 5% hp/tq due to the retarded timing on 91. So on a 991 S, that could be 20hp. Its probably not that much, but there is a difference for sure. Or at least I *think* I feel one. Its probably a MUCH bigger difference on turbo cars tuned for 93.
I saw dyno charts between 91 and 93 octane on a tuned 993 and they were losing about 5% hp/tq due to the retarded timing on 91. So on a 991 S, that could be 20hp. Its probably not that much, but there is a difference for sure. Or at least I *think* I feel one. Its probably a MUCH bigger difference on turbo cars tuned for 93.
Octane rating is simply a resistance to pre-ignition. To make use of the high rating you need to physically change something with your engine (timing, etc) otherwise this is pointless...
Most fuels have the same specific energy, it's the resistance to pre-ignition that allows you to advance the timing and raise compression ratio and better control the combustion process to squeeze a little more power out of the engine...
JR
Right, modern 911s are tuned for 93 octane, so at 91 you are running retarded timing. For older 911s (basically all air cooled), its simple, don't run ethanol since your car doesn't support it. But newer 911s you're stuck between a rock and a hard place... run ethanol or retarded timing (3-5% power loss).




