Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

944 family aluminum control arms and ball joints: what is state of the situation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2015, 04:58 PM
  #61  
Pfc. Parts
Burning Brakes
 
Pfc. Parts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flatsics
..
I guess it goes without saying that if newer was better we'd all be driving GT3s.

Thanks BTW Flat. You've just helped me make an important decision.
Old 01-10-2015, 09:39 PM
  #62  
Sterling Doc
Rennlist Member
 
Sterling Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sterling, IL
Posts: 1,459
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The steel arms are a VW Rabbit part - really old,LOL. They are also slightly lighter than the late aluminum arms, to boot. They are the practical solution, especially when properly reinforced. The shorter arms do have the downside of more camber loss, especially when lowered, though.

It's more the money part than the "newer" that keeps us out of GT3's ;-)

Last edited by Sterling Doc; 01-13-2015 at 11:45 PM.
Old 01-10-2015, 10:01 PM
  #63  
Pfc. Parts
Burning Brakes
 
Pfc. Parts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sterling Doc
It's more the money part than the "newer" that keeps us out of GT3's ;-)
Well, I don't know about you, but I've always thought I'd have to put a sack over my head for safety before I'd drive a 911. Second only to the Karman Ghia, I believe it's the ugliest car I've ever seen.

I have to revise this. After further considertion, the ugliest car I've ever seen was a Citroen Maserati, circa 1978. Thing looked like an abalone shell. I always had this vision of a very fast armored slug whenever I saw one on the road.

Last edited by Pfc. Parts; 01-10-2015 at 10:46 PM.
Old 01-10-2015, 10:13 PM
  #64  
Pfc. Parts
Burning Brakes
 
Pfc. Parts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sterling Doc
It's more the money part than the "newer" that keeps us out of GT3's ;-)
Now then, the 930 on the other hand, even though a 911 derivative like the GT3, is truly a stunning looking car. If it weren't so tail happy I'd own one in a heartbeat.
Old 01-11-2015, 12:17 AM
  #65  
Kurt R
Hates Family Guy
Rennlist Member
 
Kurt R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Crosse, WI
Posts: 3,955
Received 56 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Arkadi
Can you guys explain or post a pic of the inner barrel pivot area?
See this thread - https://rennlist.com/forums/racing-a...44-a-arms.html
Page 5 for a wrapped barrel.
Old 01-12-2015, 10:14 PM
  #66  
Dwane
Race Car
 
Dwane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,741
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Love my Pohlman arms....3 years ZERO issues.

...and Andy was the best to deal with to boot!
Old 01-14-2015, 03:35 PM
  #67  
chrenan
Three Wheelin'
 
chrenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,476
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dwane
Love my Pohlman arms....3 years ZERO issues.

...and Andy was the best to deal with to boot!
Replaced my worn Blaszak arms with Pohlman ones as well thanks this this thread! Andy was great to deal with.



Old 01-14-2015, 05:26 PM
  #68  
Pfc. Parts
Burning Brakes
 
Pfc. Parts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrenan
Replaced my worn Blaszak arms with Pohlman ones as well thanks this this thread! Andy was great to deal with.
Thanks to both you and Dwane for the testimonials, from the pictures it looks like you've spent some time on your suspension, always a good sign when evaluating a reference

It looks to me as if the choice between using the stock steal arms vs. the Pohlman arms then reduces to one of the cost to beef up the steel arms, otherwise from a price perspective the two are pretty equal. What about freedom of motion in the ball joints? It looks to me like the Pohlman arms might be less susceptible to binding up the ball joints?
Old 01-14-2015, 11:34 PM
  #69  
Racerrob
Rennlist Member
 
Racerrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,309
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Thanks, have to go look at mine, not sure I have that reinforcement.

A bit off topic but another failure can be the ball joint--don't ask how I know.


QUOTE="Kurt R;11945304"] See this thread - https://rennlist.com/forums/racing-a...44-a-arms.html Page 5 for a wrapped barrel.[/QUOTE]
Old 01-22-2015, 12:28 PM
  #70  
944Cup
Rennlist Member
 
944Cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts: 2,527
Received 46 Likes on 38 Posts
Default Ball Joint

For 944 Cup, and the SP2 and SP 3 classes, the ways the rules will be interpreted is for the allowance of non stock pin lengths for control arms and the rules will be revised next year to clarify. For this season in the SP2 and 3 classes, we interpret the rules to allow a longer pin thru a non stock length, and/or with shims.

Longer pin lengths improve the ability to lower a car more, and still retain A arm angles which are closer to stock, minimizing binding and related failures. This interpretation does not apply to PCA stock classes.

The inner end links are not permitted to be adjustable for either class.
Old 02-17-2015, 04:51 PM
  #71  
944Cup
Rennlist Member
 
944Cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts: 2,527
Received 46 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pfc. Parts
Thanks to both you and Dwane for the testimonials, from the pictures it looks like you've spent some time on your suspension, always a good sign when evaluating a reference

It looks to me as if the choice between using the stock steal arms vs. the Pohlman arms then reduces to one of the cost to beef up the steel arms, otherwise from a price perspective the two are pretty equal. What about freedom of motion in the ball joints? It looks to me like the Pohlman arms might be less susceptible to binding up the ball joints?
More info on the HS 44 arms:
https://www.facebook.com/highstrung44

Can also be bought direct by emailing: highstrung44@aol.com
Old 04-18-2017, 07:24 AM
  #72  
topley
Instructor
 
topley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Question about hardware. I assume you can reuse the bolt and nut where the HS44 A-arm connects to the crossmember. (?) what should be used where it attaches to the replacement caster block? What about the caster block replacement? Can it use the original bolts to the frame?
Thanks
Jay
Old 04-18-2017, 05:36 PM
  #73  
944Cup
Rennlist Member
 
944Cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts: 2,527
Received 46 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by topley
Question about hardware. I assume you can reuse the bolt and nut where the HS44 A-arm connects to the crossmember. (?) what should be used where it attaches to the replacement caster block? What about the caster block replacement? Can it use the original bolts to the frame?
Thanks
Jay
Yes, use all factory bolts.

Last edited by 944Cup; 04-18-2017 at 09:57 PM.



Quick Reply: 944 family aluminum control arms and ball joints: what is state of the situation?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:12 PM.