Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cones or no cones?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2012, 02:12 PM
  #31  
Bill Lehman
Three Wheelin'
 
Bill Lehman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 230 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

After a long absence from the track I entered a DE with RTR and was put in Green group. The first day there were cones which I had never seen before in my track experience but found them helpful. The second day they were removed but in the classroom we were taught to look (with a Powerpoint presentation) for various physical elements on or near the track to use as reference points. Worked for me. Today I always tell my students that the cones are approximately in the right position but may no be in the correct position for their car or driving style and early on discourage driving from cone to cone. I think they are useful for beginners but don't assume that the student knows what turn in, apex, and track out means.
Old 10-04-2012, 02:26 PM
  #32  
onefastviking
Rennlist Member
 
onefastviking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,549
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sean F
you say "turn in 5 feet before the cone"

My experience has been with green students they need reference points until they become more advanced so why not give them to them.

The challenge with this topic is that cones don't make sense for all drivers but you can't go around putting up and taking down cones for every run group.

That means you go to the lowest common denominator and the first principal is safety. I believe (personal opinion), cones make the green guys safer.
Why not give them the cones ? Because by doing that it handicaps them into needing the cones even more, as well as a habit of looking immediately in front of car vs looking much further ahead. - I think it's like giving a bum on the street a dollar, some bums might do the right thing, buy some new clothes, and then get a job even all because of the dollar you gave them, but to most of the bums it just teaches them to beg for more dollars.

I agree 100% on safety being the most important thing, that is why you as an instructor are in the car, to make sure they are safe. Cones don't make greenies safer, you, the instructors, make greenies safer. -(My Personal opinion)
Old 10-04-2012, 03:28 PM
  #33  
GuyIncognito
Rennlist Member
 
GuyIncognito's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 2,986
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
Hmm...
WTF?!?!?!?!
Old 10-04-2012, 04:40 PM
  #34  
Crazy Canuck
Race Director
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 11,183
Received 218 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dan212
No cones in general. But better still. Both.

Put the cones up on day one and take them off on day 2 or 3, but don't tell the instructors until that day.. Its good for the students AND the instructors.

If everyone is doing things right, it shouldn't really matter.
+1
Old 10-04-2012, 10:47 PM
  #35  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

while I do not like "cones" for apex-trackout goals.....I do like brake markers....since I use them for my turn in reference.....after that I always aim for the trackout edging....I look at trackout edging like "hints".....since the people who designed the track know way more than me and put those there for a reason....
Old 10-05-2012, 12:32 AM
  #36  
Ross_Bentley
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Ross_Bentley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sean F
The challenge with this topic is that cones don't make sense for all drivers but you can't go around putting up and taking down cones for every run group.
I think Sean makes a great point. Based on all the comments, and my own experience, I agree that using cones for the first few seasons just to help guide beginners around the track is a good strategy. I also agree that they should be removed very soon afterward, otherwise these drivers get into "connect the dots" driving, and take forever to truly learn the "why" behind the line they're driving. The problem is most HPDE days alternate between these beginners and more experienced drivers and no one wants to be putting cones up, taking them down, putting them up, taking them down...

Maybe someone should invent an collapsable/expanding cone that is controlled by a remote device so they can be flipped up and down with a flick of a switch... Hmmm, any clever inventor types out there?

I also agree with the comments about instructors are there to guide our students and we can't (shouldn't) rely on cones to do our jobs.

One comment I didn't see yet is about students who desperately try to avoid hitting the track-out/exit cone so much that they actually pinch the car off at the exit and spin it. I've seen more than one demonstration of that...
Old 10-05-2012, 08:38 AM
  #37  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 256 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Ross,

We use cones - mostly for the benefit of instructors teaching raw novices. It does make it easier to get them around the track the first day. At the same time we also teach drivers to look into the corner and NOT at the cones Experienced instructors will simply tell a novice (at the right time) to look left or look right and magically the car is on the line without benefit of cones.

At three day events if the weather is good we like to remove all the cones. Seeing people turn in late or early is a good indication of those who haven't learned to "see" the corner and the line.

As to exit cones, we place them on the outside of the rumble strips - if you nick them with a rear wheel, you're out too far

Best,
Old 10-05-2012, 08:47 AM
  #38  
Matt Romanowski
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Matt Romanowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 12,627
Received 940 Likes on 570 Posts
Default

I have a question for the "no cone" folks: Do you teach people to use reference points?
Old 10-05-2012, 09:24 AM
  #39  
onefastviking
Rennlist Member
 
onefastviking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,549
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Romanowski
I have a question for the "no cone" folks: Do you teach people to use reference points?
No. although it would be silly to presume that people don't find some on their own and use them.

I teach looking thru the corners and having a constant scan of the track, think panoramic view, not picture window.
As BR posted, magically, the cars seem find and be on "the line".
Old 10-05-2012, 09:58 AM
  #40  
Matt Romanowski
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Matt Romanowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 12,627
Received 940 Likes on 570 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onefastviking
No. although it would be silly to presume that people don't find some on their own and use them.

I teach looking thru the corners and having a constant scan of the track, think panoramic view, not picture window.
As BR posted, magically, the cars seem find and be on "the line".
Interesting. I agree that you have to be constantly scanning, but how do you maintain consistency without having reference points?

I think the Professor says it very well here https://rennlist.com/forums/1865854-post11.html
Old 10-05-2012, 11:48 AM
  #41  
GT3 Techno
Burning Brakes
 
GT3 Techno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
You see cones in actual races too.
I just don't get it why cones would be needed on a race track in an actual race ?!

You could see them even in a IMSA GT3 Cup event in Canada this season. Really curious to learn why they were required. Didn't the drivers have enough practice sessions even if it was their first time at Calabogie ?

Old 10-05-2012, 04:19 PM
  #42  
onefastviking
Rennlist Member
 
onefastviking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,549
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Romanowski
Interesting. I agree that you have to be constantly scanning, but how do you maintain consistency without having reference points?
That's EXACTLY the point !
You don't get the consistency at first ! Do you think anyone masters any new sport immediately ? Think you'll get a hole in one your first day golfing ? Heck no, it's a process of slow learning and mastering various techniques and skill sets.
The lack of consistency is precisely how you learn when you've turned in early,late,missed apex track out etc. - and of course the instructor in the car is right there doing what they are suppose to be with keeping you safe and not allowing you to go too far off line without the proper redirection as needed. He also offers opinions when you are off turn in, late or early, and off Apex or track out. Each time the instructor redirects the student learns and adjusts for next time.

If cones were all it took, and all it was about was to teach a student to learn how to do this, then I could paint a freaking line all the way around the track and they wouldn't even need cones !

You learn to scan the track and drive the track and corner by looking thru them. When I am instructing a student my goal is that I have taught them how to learn/drive ANY race track, or any corner for that matter, not just have taught them how to drive the track we happen to be on that weekend. This ends up helping real world driving on street as well as race track.
Old 10-05-2012, 05:57 PM
  #43  
syncspeedinc
Instructor
 
syncspeedinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 188
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is funny to read this, the " people only learn a single way, the way I teach them" method has very little truth to it. People learn the same things in different ways, just like in school so if the cones benefit some folks early on learning a DE line ( not a race line ), why not have them. You, as instructors, can tell your students if they are in the wrong place or to just ignore them based on their cars and drivers ability.
Old 10-05-2012, 05:59 PM
  #44  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 256 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Viking, I agree!
Old 10-05-2012, 09:52 PM
  #45  
Matt Romanowski
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Matt Romanowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 12,627
Received 940 Likes on 570 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onefastviking
That's EXACTLY the point !
You don't get the consistency at first ! Do you think anyone masters any new sport immediately ? Think you'll get a hole in one your first day golfing ? Heck no, it's a process of slow learning and mastering various techniques and skill sets.
The lack of consistency is precisely how you learn when you've turned in early,late,missed apex track out etc. - and of course the instructor in the car is right there doing what they are suppose to be with keeping you safe and not allowing you to go too far off line without the proper redirection as needed. He also offers opinions when you are off turn in, late or early, and off Apex or track out. Each time the instructor redirects the student learns and adjusts for next time.

If cones were all it took, and all it was about was to teach a student to learn how to do this, then I could paint a freaking line all the way around the track and they wouldn't even need cones !

You learn to scan the track and drive the track and corner by looking thru them. When I am instructing a student my goal is that I have taught them how to learn/drive ANY race track, or any corner for that matter, not just have taught them how to drive the track we happen to be on that weekend. This ends up helping real world driving on street as well as race track.
So if we are just "looking through a corner" then how do we know we put the car in the correct spot? One steering input? The fastest line?

I'm playing devils advocate here. I completely agree that you shouldn't drive point to point, but looking ahead, using ocular vision, and creating smooth lines through the track, while using references, is what we are all doing. Reference points are not just cones - they are all different things.

Without a reference point, how do you know if you hit an apex?



Quick Reply: Cones or no cones?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:12 AM.